Shih Terry, Ryan Andrew M, Gonzalez Andrew A, Dimick Justin B
*Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI †Division of Outcomes and Effectiveness Research, Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1027-31. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000778.
To project readmission penalties for hospitals performing cardiac surgery and examine how these penalties will affect minority-serving hospitals.
The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program will potentially expand penalties for higher-than-predicted readmission rates to cardiac procedures in the near future. The impact of these penalties on minority-serving hospitals is unknown.
We examined national Medicare beneficiaries undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in 2008 to 2010 (N = 255,250 patients, 1186 hospitals). Using hierarchical logistic regression, we calculated hospital observed-to-expected readmission ratios. Hospital penalties were projected according to the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program formula using only coronary artery bypass grafting readmissions with a 3% maximum penalty of total Medicare revenue. Hospitals were classified into quintiles according to proportion of black patients treated. Minority-serving hospitals were defined as hospitals in the top quintile whereas non-minority-serving hospitals were those in the bottom quintile. Projected readmission penalties were compared across quintiles.
Forty-seven percent of hospitals (559 of 1186) were projected to be assessed a penalty. Twenty-eight percent of hospitals (330 of 1186) would be penalized less than 1% of total Medicare revenue whereas 5% of hospitals (55 of 1186) would receive the maximum 3% penalty. Minority-serving hospitals were almost twice as likely to be penalized than non-minority-serving hospitals (61% vs 32%) and were projected almost triple the reductions in reimbursement ($112 million vs $41 million).
Minority-serving hospitals would disproportionately bear the burden of readmission penalties if expanded to include cardiac surgery. Given these hospitals' narrow profit margins, readmission penalties may have a profound impact on these hospitals' ability to care for disadvantaged patients.
预测实施心脏手术的医院的再入院处罚情况,并研究这些处罚将如何影响为少数族裔服务的医院。
医院再入院率降低计划可能在不久的将来扩大对高于预期再入院率的心脏手术的处罚。这些处罚对为少数族裔服务的医院的影响尚不清楚。
我们研究了2008年至2010年接受冠状动脉搭桥术的全国医疗保险受益人(N = 255,250例患者,1186家医院)。使用分层逻辑回归,我们计算了医院观察到的与预期的再入院率比值。根据医院再入院率降低计划公式,仅使用冠状动脉搭桥术再入院情况预测医院处罚,最高处罚为医疗保险总收入的3%。根据治疗黑人患者的比例将医院分为五等份。为少数族裔服务的医院定义为处于最高五分之一的医院,而非为少数族裔服务的医院是处于最低五分之一的医院。比较各五等份的预测再入院处罚情况。
预计47%的医院(1186家中的559家)将被评估处罚。28%的医院(1186家中的330家)受到的处罚将低于医疗保险总收入的1%,而5%的医院(1186家中的55家)将受到最高3%的处罚。为少数族裔服务的医院受到处罚的可能性几乎是非为少数族裔服务医院的两倍(61%对32%),预计报销减少几乎是非为少数族裔服务医院的三倍(1.12亿美元对4100万美元)。
如果将再入院处罚扩大到包括心脏手术,为少数族裔服务的医院将不成比例地承担处罚负担。鉴于这些医院的利润率微薄,再入院处罚可能会对这些医院照顾弱势患者的能力产生深远影响。