• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合生物标志物以优化患者治疗建议。

Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.

作者信息

Kang Chaeryon, Janes Holly, Huang Ying

机构信息

Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division and Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, U.S.A.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2014 Sep;70(3):695-707. doi: 10.1111/biom.12191. Epub 2014 May 30.

DOI:10.1111/biom.12191
PMID:24889663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4248022/
Abstract

Markers that predict treatment effect have the potential to improve patient outcomes. For example, the OncotypeDX® RecurrenceScore® has some ability to predict the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy over and above hormone therapy for the treatment of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer, facilitating the provision of chemotherapy to women most likely to benefit from it. Given that the score was originally developed for predicting outcome given hormone therapy alone, it is of interest to develop alternative combinations of the genes comprising the score that are optimized for treatment selection. However, most methodology for combining markers is useful when predicting outcome under a single treatment. We propose a method for combining markers for treatment selection which requires modeling the treatment effect as a function of markers. Multiple models of treatment effect are fit iteratively by upweighting or "boosting" subjects potentially misclassified according to treatment benefit at the previous stage. The boosting approach is compared to existing methods in a simulation study based on the change in expected outcome under marker-based treatment. The approach improves upon methods in some settings and has comparable performance in others. Our simulation study also provides insights as to the relative merits of the existing methods. Application of the boosting approach to the breast cancer data, using scaled versions of the original markers, produces marker combinations that may have improved performance for treatment selection.

摘要

预测治疗效果的标志物有改善患者治疗结果的潜力。例如,OncotypeDX®复发评分®在预测辅助化疗相对于激素疗法治疗雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的益处方面具有一定能力,有助于为最可能从化疗中获益的女性提供化疗。鉴于该评分最初是为仅预测激素疗法的结果而开发的,因此开发针对治疗选择进行优化的该评分所包含基因的替代组合很有意义。然而,大多数用于组合标志物的方法在预测单一治疗下的结果时很有用。我们提出了一种用于治疗选择的组合标志物的方法,该方法需要将治疗效果建模为标志物的函数。通过对上一阶段根据治疗益处可能被错误分类的受试者进行加权或“提升”,迭代拟合多个治疗效果模型。在基于标志物治疗下预期结果变化的模拟研究中,将提升方法与现有方法进行比较。该方法在某些情况下优于现有方法,在其他情况下具有可比的性能。我们的模拟研究还提供了有关现有方法相对优点的见解。将提升方法应用于乳腺癌数据,使用原始标志物的缩放版本,产生的标志物组合可能在治疗选择方面具有更好的性能。

相似文献

1
Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.结合生物标志物以优化患者治疗建议。
Biometrics. 2014 Sep;70(3):695-707. doi: 10.1111/biom.12191. Epub 2014 May 30.
2
Discussion of combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.关于结合生物标志物以优化患者治疗建议的讨论。
Biometrics. 2014 Sep;70(3):713-6. doi: 10.1111/biom.12189. Epub 2014 May 30.
3
Rejoinder: Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.回应:结合生物标志物以优化患者治疗建议。
Biometrics. 2014 Sep;70(3):719-20. doi: 10.1111/biom.12192. Epub 2014 May 30.
4
Discussion of "Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendation".关于“结合生物标志物以优化患者治疗建议”的讨论
Biometrics. 2014 Sep;70(3):707-10. doi: 10.1111/biom.12187. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Discussion.讨论。
Biometrics. 2014 Sep;70(3):710-3. doi: 10.1111/biom.12188. Epub 2014 May 30.
6
Discussion of "Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations" by Chaeryon Kang, Holly Janes, and Ying Huang.蔡伦·康、霍利·杰恩斯和黄莹所著《结合生物标志物以优化患者治疗建议》的讨论
Biometrics. 2014 Sep;70(3):716-9. doi: 10.1111/biom.12190. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
7
Omnibus risk assessment via accelerated failure time kernel machine modeling.通过加速失效时间核机器建模进行综合风险评估。
Biometrics. 2013 Dec;69(4):861-73. doi: 10.1111/biom.12098. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
8
Non-parametric kernel density estimation for the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes.用于预测新辅助化疗结果的非参数核密度估计
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:1775-8. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626748.
9
Identifying optimal biomarker combinations for treatment selection via a robust kernel method.通过一种稳健的核方法识别用于治疗选择的最佳生物标志物组合。
Biometrics. 2014 Dec;70(4):891-901. doi: 10.1111/biom.12204. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
10
Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.用于指导早期乳腺癌女性辅助化疗决策的基因表达谱分析:基于证据的经济分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(23):1-57. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Transfer learning of individualized treatment rules from experimental to real-world data.将个性化治疗规则从实验数据转移到真实世界数据的迁移学习。
J Comput Graph Stat. 2023;32(3):1036-1045. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2022.2141752. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
2
Multiple domain and multiple kernel outcome-weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment regimes.用于估计个体化治疗方案的多域多核结果加权学习
J Comput Graph Stat. 2022;31(4):1375-1383. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2022.2067552. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Model selection for survival individualized treatment rules using the jackknife estimator.利用刀切估计量进行生存个体化治疗规则的模型选择。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01811-6.
4
Focusing on optimality for the translation of precision medicine.专注于精准医学翻译的最优性。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Aug 4;6(1):e118. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.438. eCollection 2022.
5
Functional additive models for optimizing individualized treatment rules.功能添加剂模型用于优化个体化治疗规则。
Biometrics. 2023 Mar;79(1):113-126. doi: 10.1111/biom.13586. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
6
A parsimonious personalized dose-finding model via dimension reduction.一种通过降维实现的简约个性化剂量探索模型。
Biometrika. 2021 Sep;108(3):643-659. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asaa087. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
7
A tutorial on individualized treatment effect prediction from randomized trials with a binary endpoint.关于二分类结局随机试验中个体治疗效果预测的教程。
Stat Med. 2021 Nov 20;40(26):5961-5981. doi: 10.1002/sim.9154. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
8
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Personalized Medicine With Software.利用软件评估个性化医疗的有效性。
Front Big Data. 2021 May 18;4:572532. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.572532. eCollection 2021.
9
Matched Learning for Optimizing Individualized Treatment Strategies Using Electronic Health Records.利用电子健康记录进行匹配学习以优化个性化治疗策略
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(529):380-392. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1549050. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
A sparse additive model for treatment effect-modifier selection.稀疏加法模型用于治疗效果修饰符选择。
Biostatistics. 2022 Apr 13;23(2):412-429. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa032.

本文引用的文献

1
An approach to evaluating and comparing biomarkers for patient treatment selection.一种用于评估和比较生物标志物以进行患者治疗选择的方法。
Int J Biostat. 2014;10(1):99-121. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0052.
2
A framework for evaluating markers used to select patient treatment.用于评估用于选择患者治疗的标志物的框架。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Feb;34(2):159-67. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13493147. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
3
Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning.使用结果加权学习估计个体化治疗规则。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2012 Sep 1;107(449):1106-1118. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2012.695674.
4
A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.一种估计最优治疗方案的稳健方法。
Biometrics. 2012 Dec;68(4):1010-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01763.x. Epub 2012 May 2.
5
Variable selection for optimal treatment decision.变量选择以实现最佳治疗决策。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2013 Oct;22(5):493-504. doi: 10.1177/0962280211428383. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
6
Variable selection for qualitative interactions in personalized medicine while controlling the family-wise error rate.在控制家族性错误率的同时,进行个性化医疗中定性相互作用的变量选择。
J Biopharm Stat. 2011 Nov;21(6):1063-78. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.608052.
7
AUC-based biomarker ensemble with an application on gene scores predicting low bone mineral density.基于 AUC 的生物标志物组合在基因评分预测低骨密度中的应用。
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):3050-5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr516. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
8
Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.随机临床试验数据中的亚组识别。
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 30;30(24):2867-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.4322. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
9
PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.个性化治疗规则的性能保证
Ann Stat. 2011 Apr 1;39(2):1180-1210. doi: 10.1214/10-AOS864.
10
Measuring the performance of markers for guiding treatment decisions.测量指导治疗决策标志物的性能。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 15;154(4):253-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-4-201102150-00006.