Suppr超能文献

相似文献

1
Multiple domain and multiple kernel outcome-weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment regimes.
J Comput Graph Stat. 2022;31(4):1375-1383. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2022.2067552. Epub 2022 May 19.
2
High-Dimensional Precision Medicine From Patient-Derived Xenografts.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(535):1140-1154. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1828091. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Residual Weighted Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;112(517):169-187. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1093947. Epub 2017 May 3.
4
Active Clinical Trials for Personalized Medicine.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111(514):875-887. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1066682. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
6
Meta-analysis of individualized treatment rules via sign-coherency.
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2022;193:171-198. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
8
Learning Personalized Treatment Rules from Electronic Health Records Using Topic Modeling Feature Extraction.
Proc Int Conf Data Sci Adv Anal. 2019 Oct;2019:392-402. doi: 10.1109/dsaa.2019.00054. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
9
Multi-Armed Angle-Based Direct Learning for Estimating Optimal Individualized Treatment Rules With Various Outcomes.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(530):678-691. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1529597. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
On using electronic health records to improve optimal treatment rules in randomized trials.
Biometrics. 2020 Dec;76(4):1075-1086. doi: 10.1111/biom.13288. Epub 2020 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian Index Models for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects on a Binary Outcome.
Stat Biosci. 2023;15(2):397-418. doi: 10.1007/s12561-023-09370-0. Epub 2023 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
On using electronic health records to improve optimal treatment rules in randomized trials.
Biometrics. 2020 Dec;76(4):1075-1086. doi: 10.1111/biom.13288. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
Maximin Projection Learning for Optimal Treatment Decision with Heterogeneous Individualized Treatment Effects.
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2018 Sep;80(4):681-702. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12273. Epub 2018 May 10.
3
Augmented outcome-weighted learning for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimens.
Stat Med. 2018 Nov 20;37(26):3776-3788. doi: 10.1002/sim.7844. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Statistical Analysis Plan for Stage 1 EMBARC (Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care) Study.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Jun;6:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
5
Establishing moderators and biosignatures of antidepressant response in clinical care (EMBARC): Rationale and design.
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Jul;78:11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
6
Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.
Biometrics. 2014 Sep;70(3):695-707. doi: 10.1111/biom.12191. Epub 2014 May 30.
7
Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective.
Stat. 2012 Jan 1;1(1):103-114. doi: 10.1002/sta.411.
8
Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2012 Sep 1;107(449):1106-1118. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2012.695674.
9
A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.
Biometrics. 2012 Dec;68(4):1010-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01763.x. Epub 2012 May 2.
10
PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.
Ann Stat. 2011 Apr 1;39(2):1180-1210. doi: 10.1214/10-AOS864.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验