Suppr超能文献

中毒体外治疗病例报告指南:方法学

Guidelines for reporting case studies on extracorporeal treatments in poisonings: methodology.

作者信息

Lavergne Valéry, Ouellet Georges, Bouchard Josée, Galvao Tais, Kielstein Jan T, Roberts Darren M, Kanji Salmaan, Mowry James B, Calello Diane P, Hoffman Robert S, Gosselin Sophie, Nolin Thomas D, Goldfarb David S, Burdmann Emmanuel A, Dargan Paul I, Decker Brian Scott, Hoegberg Lotte C, Maclaren Robert, Megarbane Bruno, Sowinski Kevin M, Yates Christopher, Mactier Robert, Wiegand Timothy, Ghannoum Marc

机构信息

Department of Medical Biology, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Semin Dial. 2014 Jul-Aug;27(4):407-14. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12251. Epub 2014 May 29.

Abstract

A literature review performed by the EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning (EXTRIP) workgroup highlighted deficiencies in the existing literature, especially the reporting of case studies. Although general reporting guidelines exist for case studies, there are none in the specific field of extracorporeal treatments in toxicology. Our goal was to construct and propose a checklist that systematically outlines the minimum essential items to be reported in a case study of poisoned patients undergoing extracorporeal treatments. Through a modified two-round Delphi technique, panelists (mostly chosen from the EXTRIP workgroup) were asked to vote on the pertinence of a set of items to identify those considered minimally essential for reporting complete and accurate case reports. Furthermore, independent raters validated the clarity of each selected items between each round of voting. All case reports containing data on extracorporeal treatments in poisoning published in Medline in 2011 were reviewed during the external validation rounds. Twenty-one panelists (20 from the EXTRIP workgroup and an invited expert on pharmacology reporting guidelines) participated in the modified Delphi technique. This group included journal editors and experts in nephrology, clinical toxicology, critical care medicine, emergency medicine, and clinical pharmacology. Three independent raters participated in the validation rounds. Panelists voted on a total of 144 items in the first round and 137 items in the second round, with response rates of 96.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Twenty case reports were evaluated at each validation round and the independent raters' response rate was 99.6% and 98.8% per validation round. The final checklist consists of 114 items considered essential for case study reporting. This methodology of alternate voting and external validation rounds was useful in developing the first reporting guideline for case studies in the field of extracorporeal treatments in poisoning. We believe that this guideline will improve the completeness and transparency of published case reports and that the systematic aggregation of information from case reports may provide early signals of effectiveness and/or harm, thereby improving healthcare decision-making.

摘要

体外中毒治疗(EXTRIP)工作组开展的一项文献综述突出了现有文献中的不足之处,尤其是病例研究报告方面。尽管存在病例研究的一般报告指南,但在毒理学体外治疗这一特定领域却没有。我们的目标是构建并提出一份清单,系统地列出在接受体外治疗的中毒患者病例研究中应报告的最低必要项目。通过改良的两轮德尔菲技术,小组成员(大多选自EXTRIP工作组)被要求就一组项目的相关性进行投票,以确定那些被认为是完整准确病例报告所必需的项目。此外,独立评估者在每轮投票之间验证每个选定项目的清晰度。在外部验证阶段,对2011年发表在Medline上的所有包含中毒体外治疗数据的病例报告进行了审查。21名小组成员(20名来自EXTRIP工作组以及一名受邀的药理学报告指南专家)参与了改良的德尔菲技术。该小组包括期刊编辑以及肾病学、临床毒理学、重症医学、急诊医学和临床药理学方面的专家。三名独立评估者参与了验证阶段。小组成员在第一轮投票中对总共144个项目进行了投票,第二轮投票中有137个项目,回复率分别为96.3%和98.3%。在每个验证阶段对20份病例报告进行了评估,独立评估者在每个验证阶段的回复率分别为99.6%和98.8%。最终清单包含114个被认为对病例研究报告至关重要的项目。这种交替投票和外部验证阶段的方法对于制定中毒体外治疗领域病例研究的首个报告指南很有用。我们相信,该指南将提高已发表病例报告的完整性和透明度,并且病例报告信息的系统汇总可能会提供有效性和/或危害的早期信号,从而改善医疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e8a/4282789/8833f27ac524/sdi0027-0407-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验