• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Time to screening in the systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening trial.在支持增加结直肠癌筛查试验的系统中进行筛查的时间。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Aug;23(8):1683-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0270. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
2
Effect of a Digital Health Intervention on Receipt of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.数字健康干预对脆弱患者接受结直肠癌筛查的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 17;168(8):550-557. doi: 10.7326/M17-2315. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
3
A Randomized Trial to Compare a Tailored Web-Based Intervention and Tailored Phone Counseling to Usual Care for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening.一项比较基于网络的个性化干预与个性化电话咨询和常规护理对提高结直肠癌筛查的随机试验
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Dec;27(12):1433-1441. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0180. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Virtual colonoscopy, optical colonoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.用于结直肠癌筛查的虚拟结肠镜检查、光学结肠镜检查或粪便潜血检测:一项试点随机对照试验的结果
Trials. 2015 Jul 9;16:296. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0826-7.
5
An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.一项采用逐步增加支持的自动化干预措施以提高结直肠癌筛查率的随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 1):301-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00002.
6
Personal navigation increases colorectal cancer screening uptake.个性化导航可提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Mar;24(3):506-11. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0744. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
7
Cost effectiveness of interventions to promote screening for colorectal cancer: a randomized trial.促进结直肠癌筛查干预措施的成本效益:一项随机试验。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2011 May;44(3):101-10. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.3.101.
8
Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial.以患者为中心的医疗之家持续邮寄粪便检测的影响:增加结肠癌筛查与随访支持系统随机试验的第3年
Cancer. 2016 Jan 15;122(2):312-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29734. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
9
Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Increased after Exposure to the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH).接触以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)后,结直肠癌筛查率有所提高。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):191-200. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150290.
10
Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.结肠镜检查外展与粪便免疫化学检测外展对结直肠癌筛查完成率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):806-815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11389.

引用本文的文献

1
Analytic Challenges Arising from the STOP CRC Trial: Pragmatic Solutions for Pragmatic Problems.STOP CRC试验带来的分析挑战:针对实际问题的实用解决方案。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Dec 9;3(1):1200. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1200. eCollection 2015.
2
Can we achieve an 80% screening rate for colorectal cancer by 2018 in the United States?到2018年,我们能在美国实现80%的结直肠癌筛查率吗?
Cancer. 2015 Jul 1;121(13):2127-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29335. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use--United States, 2012.生命体征:2012 年美国结直肠癌筛查检测使用情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Nov 8;62(44):881-8.
2
Effectiveness and reach of the FLU-FIT program in an integrated health care system: a multisite randomized trial.在综合医疗体系中,FLU-FIT 项目的效果和覆盖范围:一项多地点随机试验。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):1128-33. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300998. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
3
An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.一项采用逐步增加支持的自动化干预措施以提高结直肠癌筛查率的随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 1):301-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00002.
4
Contribution of screening and survival differences to racial disparities in colorectal cancer rates.筛查和生存差异对结直肠癌发病率的种族差异的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 May;21(5):728-36. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0023. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
5
Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants.支持系统以提高结直肠癌筛查和随访率(SOS):试验参与者的设计、挑战和基线特征。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov;31(6):589-603. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
6
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates.国家癌症报告:1975-2006 年,重点介绍结直肠癌的流行趋势和干预措施(危险因素、筛查和治疗)对降低未来发病率的影响
Cancer. 2010 Feb 1;116(3):544-73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24760.
7
Cancer statistics, 2009.2009年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. Epub 2009 May 27.
8
Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.使用便潜血试验(Hemoccult)筛查结直肠癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD001216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001216.pub2.
9
Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.疾病回顾性研究数据的统计分析方面
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719-48.
10
Proportional hazards model with random effects.具有随机效应的比例风险模型。
Stat Med. 2000 Dec 30;19(24):3309-24. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001230)19:24<3309::aid-sim825>3.0.co;2-9.

在支持增加结直肠癌筛查试验的系统中进行筛查的时间。

Time to screening in the systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening trial.

作者信息

Wang Ching-Yun, de Dieu Tapsoba Jean, Anderson Melissa L, Vernon Sally W, Chubak Jessica, Fuller Sharon, Green Beverly B

机构信息

Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center;

Group Health Research Institute;

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Aug;23(8):1683-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0270. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0270
PMID:24891548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4119537/
Abstract

Understanding how interventions affect time to completion of colorectal cancer screening might assist in planning and delivering population-based screening interventions. The Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening (SOS) study was conducted between 2008 and 2011 at 21 primary care medical centers in Western Washington. Participants in the study, ages 50 to 73 years, were eligible if they were enrolled in Group Health (Seattle, WA) and were due for colorectal cancer screening. Of note, 4,675 recruited participants were randomized to usual care or one of three interventions with incremental levels of systems of support for completion of colorectal cancer screening. We conducted time to screening analyses of the SOS data in years 1 and 2. We investigated whether these effects were time-varying. For year 1, the intervention effects on the time to completion of colorectal cancer screening were the strongest during the first two post-randomization months and then decreased, with no significant effect after the fifth month. For year 2, the intervention effects on the time to colorectal cancer screening increased from the first to the third month and then decreased, with no significant effect after the fifth month. Hence, each of the interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening had its greatest effect within the first 3 months after being offered to participants. Future studies should test whether booster interventions offered later could increase screening rate among those who remain unscreened. Additional research is needed to develop intervention strategies for colorectal cancer screening that focus on sustained behavior over time.

摘要

了解干预措施如何影响结直肠癌筛查完成时间,可能有助于规划和实施基于人群的筛查干预措施。提高结直肠癌筛查支持系统(SOS)研究于2008年至2011年在华盛顿州西部的21个初级保健医疗中心进行。该研究的参与者年龄在50至73岁之间,若他们参加了Group Health(华盛顿州西雅图)且应进行结直肠癌筛查,则符合条件。值得注意的是,4675名招募的参与者被随机分配到常规护理组或三种干预措施之一,这三种干预措施对完成结直肠癌筛查的支持系统水平逐步提高。我们对SOS数据的第1年和第2年进行了筛查时间分析。我们调查了这些影响是否随时间变化。在第1年,干预措施对结直肠癌筛查完成时间的影响在随机分组后的前两个月最强,然后下降,在第5个月后无显著影响。在第2年,干预措施对结直肠癌筛查时间的影响从第1个月到第3个月增加,然后下降,在第5个月后无显著影响。因此,每项增加结直肠癌筛查的干预措施在向参与者提供后的前3个月内效果最大。未来的研究应测试后期提供的强化干预措施是否能提高未筛查者的筛查率。还需要进行更多研究,以制定侧重于长期持续行为的结直肠癌筛查干预策略。