Suppr超能文献

草药疗法在治疗小肠细菌过度生长方面与利福昔明等效。

Herbal therapy is equivalent to rifaximin for the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

作者信息

Chedid Victor, Dhalla Sameer, Clarke John O, Roland Bani Chander, Dunbar Kerry B, Koh Joyce, Justino Edmundo, Tomakin Eric, Mullin Gerard E

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Chedid), United States.

The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Dhalla), United States.

出版信息

Glob Adv Health Med. 2014 May;3(3):16-24. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2014.019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients with small intestine bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) have chronic intestinal and extraintestinal symptomatology which adversely affects their quality of life. Present treatment of SIBO is limited to oral antibiotics with variable success. A growing number of patients are interested in using complementary and alternative therapies for their gastrointestinal health. The objective was to determine the remission rate of SIBO using either the antibiotic rifaximin or herbals in a tertiary care referral gastroenterology practice.

DESIGN

One hundred and four patients who tested positive for newly diagnosed SIBO by lactulose breath testing (LBT) were offered either rifaximin 1200 mg daily vs herbal therapy for 4 weeks with repeat LBT post-treatment.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-six patients underwent LBT for suspected SIBO, of which 251 (63.4%) were positive 165 underwent treatment and 104 had a follow-up LBT. Of the 37 patients who received herbal therapy, 17 (46%) had a negative follow-up LBT compared to 23/67 (34%) of rifaximin users (P=.24). The odds ratio of having a negative LBT after taking herbal therapy as compared to rifaximin was 1.85 (CI=0.77-4.41, P=.17) once adjusted for age, gender, SIBO risk factors and IBS status. Fourteen of the 44 (31.8%) rifaximin non-responders were offered herbal rescue therapy, with 8 of the 14 (57.1%) having a negative LBT after completing the rescue herbal therapy, while 10 non-responders were offered triple antibiotics with 6 responding (60%, P=.89). Adverse effects were reported among the rifaximin treated arm including 1 case of anaphylaxis, 2 cases of hives, 2 cases of diarrhea and 1 case of Clostridium difficile. Only one case of diarrhea was reported in the herbal therapy arm, which did not reach statistical significance (P=.22).

CONCLUSION

SIBO is widely prevalent in a tertiary referral gastroenterology practice. Herbal therapies are at least as effective as rifaximin for resolution of SIBO by LBT. Herbals also appear to be as effective as triple antibiotic therapy for SIBO rescue therapy for rifaximin non-responders. Further, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and explore additional alternative therapies in patients with refractory SIBO.

摘要

目的

小肠细菌过度生长(SIBO)患者存在慢性肠道及肠道外症状,这对他们的生活质量产生不利影响。目前SIBO的治疗仅限于口服抗生素,但疗效不一。越来越多的患者对使用补充和替代疗法来改善胃肠道健康感兴趣。本研究的目的是在一家三级医疗转诊胃肠病学诊所中,确定使用抗生素利福昔明或草药治疗SIBO的缓解率。

设计

对104例通过乳果糖呼气试验(LBT)新诊断为SIBO呈阳性的患者,给予每日1200mg利福昔明或草药治疗4周,并在治疗后重复进行LBT。

结果

396例患者因疑似SIBO接受了LBT,其中251例(63.4%)呈阳性,165例接受治疗,104例进行了随访LBT。在接受草药治疗的37例患者中,17例(46%)随访LBT结果为阴性,而利福昔明使用者中这一比例为23/67(34%)(P=0.24)。在对年龄、性别、SIBO危险因素和肠易激综合征(IBS)状态进行调整后,与利福昔明相比,接受草药治疗后LBT结果为阴性的优势比为1.85(CI=0.77-4.41,P=0.17)。44例利福昔明治疗无反应者中有14例接受了草药补救治疗,其中14例中有8例(57.1%)在完成补救草药治疗后LBT结果为阴性,而10例无反应者接受了三联抗生素治疗,6例有反应(60%,P=0.89)。利福昔明治疗组报告了不良反应,包括1例过敏反应、2例荨麻疹、2例腹泻和1例艰难梭菌感染。草药治疗组仅报告了1例腹泻,未达到统计学显著性(P=0.22)。

结论

SIBO在三级转诊胃肠病学诊所中广泛存在。草药疗法在通过LBT解决SIBO方面至少与利福昔明一样有效。对于利福昔明治疗无反应的SIBO患者,草药疗法在补救治疗中似乎也与三联抗生素疗法一样有效。此外,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现,并探索难治性SIBO患者的其他替代疗法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c05f/4030608/d7e3ccde0bb3/gahmj.2014.019.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验