Cook Emily C, Pflieger Jacqueline C, Connell Arin M, Connell Christian M
Rhode Island College, 600 Mt. Pleasant Ave, Providence, RI, 02906, USA,
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;43(1):95-106. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9880-y.
Latent transition analysis was used to identify patterns and trajectories of antisocial behavior (ASB) and their association with young adult outcomes in a nationally representative sample of adolescents (N = 5,422; 53.9% female). Participants were on average 13.96 years of age (SD = 1.06) at wave 1 of the study. Latent class analysis identified four classes of ASB including a non-ASB class, an aggressive class, a petty theft class, and a serious ASB class. In general, youth who were classified as serious stable ASB were the most at risk for problematic functioning in young adulthood. Youth who escalated to more serious patterns of ASB or reduced involvement also were at greater risk of negative outcomes in young adulthood compared to stable non-ASB youth, although they generally fared better than youth involved in stable patterns of more serious ASB. Gender differences indicated that involvement in ASB was a greater risk factor for alcohol use among boys and a greater risk factor for depression among girls in young adulthood. Results are discussed in terms of the predictive validity of classes of ASB to functioning in young adulthood and the implications of this research for prevention efforts.
潜在转变分析被用于识别反社会行为(ASB)的模式和轨迹,以及它们与全国代表性青少年样本(N = 5422;53.9%为女性)的青年期结局之间的关联。在研究的第1波中,参与者的平均年龄为13.96岁(标准差 = 1.06)。潜在类别分析确定了四类反社会行为,包括非反社会行为类别、攻击性行为类别、小偷小摸行为类别和严重反社会行为类别。总体而言,被归类为严重稳定反社会行为的青少年在青年期出现功能问题的风险最高。与稳定的非反社会行为青少年相比,升级到更严重反社会行为模式或减少参与的青少年在青年期出现负面结局的风险也更高,尽管他们通常比参与更严重稳定反社会行为模式的青少年情况要好。性别差异表明,在青年期,参与反社会行为对男孩饮酒来说是一个更大的风险因素,对女孩抑郁来说是一个更大的风险因素。本文从反社会行为类别对青年期功能的预测效度以及该研究对预防工作的意义方面对结果进行了讨论。