McCaughey E J, McLachlan A J, Gollee H
Centre for Rehabilitation Engineering, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Centre for Rehabilitation Engineering, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Med Eng Phys. 2014 Aug;36(8):1057-61. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation (AFES) has been shown to improve the respiratory function of people with tetraplegia. The effectiveness of AFES can be enhanced by using different stimulation parameters for quiet breathing and coughing. The signal from a spirometer, coupled with a facemask, has previously been used to differentiate between these breath types. In this study, the suitability of less intrusive sensors was investigated with able-bodied volunteers. Signals from two respiratory effort belts, positioned around the chest and the abdomen, were used with a Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm, trained on a participant by participant basis, to classify, in real-time, respiratory activity as either quiet breathing or coughing. This was compared with the classification accuracy achieved using a spirometer signal and an SVM. The signal from the belt positioned around the chest provided an acceptable classification performance compared to the signal from a spirometer (mean cough (c) and quiet breath (q) sensitivity (Se) of Se(c)=92.9% and Se(q)=96.1% vs. Se(c)=90.7% and Se(q)=98.9%). The abdominal belt and a combination of both belt signals resulted in lower classification accuracy. We suggest that this novel SVM classification algorithm, combined with a respiratory effort belt, could be incorporated into an automatic AFES device, designed to improve the respiratory function of the tetraplegic population.
腹部功能性电刺激(AFES)已被证明可改善四肢瘫痪患者的呼吸功能。通过对安静呼吸和咳嗽使用不同的刺激参数,可以提高AFES的有效性。先前已使用肺活量计与面罩相结合产生的信号来区分这些呼吸类型。在本研究中,对健康志愿者使用侵入性较小的传感器的适用性进行了研究。来自位于胸部和腹部的两条呼吸力带的信号与支持向量机(SVM)算法一起使用,该算法在逐个参与者的基础上进行训练,以实时将呼吸活动分类为安静呼吸或咳嗽。将其与使用肺活量计信号和SVM所达到的分类准确率进行比较。与肺活量计信号相比,位于胸部的带子发出的信号提供了可接受的分类性能(平均咳嗽(c)和安静呼吸(q)敏感度(Se)分别为Se(c)=92.9%和Se(q)=96.1%,而肺活量计信号的Se(c)=90.7%和Se(q)=98.9%)。腹部带子以及两条带子信号的组合导致较低的分类准确率。我们建议,这种新颖的SVM分类算法与呼吸力带相结合,可纳入旨在改善四肢瘫痪人群呼吸功能的自动AFES设备中。