简明健康状况调查问卷（SF-36）第2版的巴西标准数据。
Brazilian normative data for the Short Form 36 questionnaire, version 2.
作者信息
Laguardia Josue, Campos Monica Rodrigues, Travassos Claudia, Najar Alberto Lopes, Anjos Luiz Antonio dos, Vasconcellos Miguel Murat
机构信息
Institute of Communication and Scientific and Technological Information in Health, Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
National School of Public Health, Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
出版信息
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;16(4):889-97. doi: 10.1590/s1415-790x2013000400009.
METHODS
The study Pesquisa Dimensões Sociais das Desigualdades (PDSD) (Social Dimensions of Inequalities) involves 12,423 randomly selected Brazilian men and women aged 18 years old or more from urban and rural areas of the five Brazilian regions, and the information collected included the SF-36 as a measure of health-related quality of life. This provided a unique opportunity to develop age and gender-adjusted normative data for the Brazilian population.
RESULTS
Brazilian men scored substantially higher than women on all eight domains and the two summary component scales of the SF-36. Brazilians scored less than their international counterparts on almost all of SF-36 domains and both summary component scales, except on general health status (US), pain (UK) and vitality (Australia, US and Canada).
CONCLUSION
The differences in the SF-36 scores between age groups, genders and countries confirm that these Brazilian norms are necessary for comparative purposes. The data will be useful for assessing the health status of the general population and of patient populations, and the effect of interventions on health-related quality of life.
方法
社会不平等维度研究（PDSD）涵盖了从巴西五个地区城乡随机选取的12423名18岁及以上的巴西男性和女性，收集的信息包括作为健康相关生活质量衡量指标的SF-36。这为制定巴西人群年龄和性别调整后的标准数据提供了独特机会。
结果
在SF-36的所有八个领域以及两个总结分量表上，巴西男性得分显著高于女性。在SF-36几乎所有领域和两个总结分量表上，巴西人的得分低于国际同行，除了一般健康状况（美国）、疼痛（英国）和活力（澳大利亚、美国和加拿大）。
结论
年龄组、性别和国家之间SF-36得分的差异证实，这些巴西标准对于比较目的是必要的。这些数据将有助于评估普通人群和患者群体的健康状况，以及干预措施对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Zotero 插件