• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

备选方案数量对人类选择的影响。

Effects of number of alternatives on choice in humans.

作者信息

Suzuki S

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, Faculty of Letters, Hokkaido University, Kita-10, Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060, Japan.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 1997 Feb;39(2):205-14. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(96)00049-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0376-6357(96)00049-6
PMID:24896966
Abstract

The present study examined human choice between a task including a single alternative (i.e. a single-alternative task), and a task including multiple alternatives (i.e. a multi-alternative task). The subjects were divided into three groups and were exposed to three conditions. The multi-alternative task included two alternatives in two groups and included three alternatives in one group. An alternative in the single-alternative task was identical to one in the multi-alternative task. Amount of reinforcement for alternatives specific to the multi-alternative tasks was manipulated under three conditions in each group. When the amount of reinforcement was equal to or larger than that in the alternative common to both tasks, the subjects preferred the multi-alternative task over the single-alternative task. When amount of reinforcement was smaller, there was no difference in preference between the multi-alternative and the single-alternative tasks. In addition, the degree of preference for the multi-alternative task depended on the number of alternatives that produced larger reinforcers.

摘要

本研究考察了人类在包含单一选项的任务(即单选项任务)和包含多个选项的任务(即多选项任务)之间的选择。受试者被分为三组,并接受三种条件。多选项任务在两组中包含两个选项,在一组中包含三个选项。单选项任务中的一个选项与多选项任务中的一个选项相同。在每组的三种条件下,对多选项任务特有的选项的强化量进行了操纵。当强化量等于或大于两个任务共有的选项中的强化量时,受试者更喜欢多选项任务而非单选项任务。当强化量较小时,多选项任务和单选项任务在偏好上没有差异。此外,对多选项任务的偏好程度取决于产生更大强化物的选项数量。

相似文献

1
Effects of number of alternatives on choice in humans.备选方案数量对人类选择的影响。
Behav Processes. 1997 Feb;39(2):205-14. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(96)00049-6.
2
Human self-control and the density of reinforcement.人类的自我控制与强化物的密度。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Mar;57(2):201-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-201.
3
Human Behavior in Suboptimal Choice Tasks: Defining Optimality.次优选择任务中的人类行为:界定最优性。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Jul 1;47(2):435-447. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00411-7. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.在多个选项中进行选择:相对强化率和总体强化率。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Sep;108(2):204-222. doi: 10.1002/jeab.269. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.鸽子的次优选择:选择主要基于条件性强化物的价值,而非整体强化率。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(2):212-20. doi: 10.1037/xan0000092. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
6
Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.单一延迟强化物与多个延迟强化物之间的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67.
7
Molar versus local reinforcement probability as determinants of stimulus value.作为刺激值决定因素的整体强化概率与局部强化概率
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):163-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-163.
8
Effects of the relative values of alternatives on preference for free-choice in humans.人类中备选方案的相对价值对自由选择偏好的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Sep;102(2):241-51. doi: 10.1002/jeab.99. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
9
Impulsivity in spontaneously hypertensive rats: Within-subjects comparison of sensitivity to delay and to amount of reinforcement.自发性高血压大鼠的冲动性:对延迟和强化量敏感性的受试者内比较。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jun 15;328:178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.04.033. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
10
Choice among two and three alternatives.在两个和三个选项之间进行选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 May;107(3):369-387. doi: 10.1002/jeab.258.

引用本文的文献

1
Abstinence from Substance Use & The Value of Control.物质使用戒断与控制的价值。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 8:2025.05.02.651720. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.02.651720.
2
Sensitivity to the Instrumental Value of Choice Increases Across Development.选择的工具价值敏感性在整个发展过程中增加。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Aug;35(8):933-947. doi: 10.1177/09567976241256961. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
Intrinsic motivation for choice varies with individual risk attitudes and the controllability of the environment.选择的内在动机因个体风险态度和环境的可控性而异。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Aug 11;19(8):e1010551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010551. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Corticostriatal Circuits Encode the Subjective Value of Perceived Control.皮质纹状体回路编码感知控制的主观价值。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Dec 17;29(12):5049-5060. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz045.
5
A Reward-Based Framework of Perceived Control.一个基于奖励的感知控制框架。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Feb 12;13:65. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00065. eCollection 2019.
6
The intrinsic value of choice: The propensity to under-delegate in the face of potential gains and losses.选择的内在价值:面对潜在收益和损失时不愿充分授权的倾向。
J Risk Uncertain. 2017;54(3):187-202. doi: 10.1007/s11166-017-9259-x. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Control and Effort Costs Influence the Motivational Consequences of Choice.控制成本和努力成本会影响选择的动机结果。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 3;8:675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00675. eCollection 2017.
8
Greater healthful food variety as measured by the US Healthy Food Diversity index is associated with lower odds of metabolic syndrome and its components in US adults.根据美国健康食品多样性指数衡量,更丰富的健康食物种类与美国成年人代谢综合征及其组成部分的较低发生率相关。
J Nutr. 2015 Mar;145(3):564-71. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.199125. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
9
The inherent reward of choice.选择的内在回报。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Oct;22(10):1310-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417005. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
10
Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control.天生选择:控制欲的起源和价值。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;14(10):457-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001.