• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于选择与强化百分比的进一步研究。

A further study of choice and percentage reinforcement.

作者信息

Kendall S B

机构信息

Psychology Dept., University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario Canada, N6A 5C2.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 1985 May;10(4):399-413. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(85)90040-3.

DOI:10.1016/0376-6357(85)90040-3
PMID:24897575
Abstract

In Experiment I four pigeons were trained in a concurrent chains procedure with fixed-ratio schedules (FR1) in the initial components and fixed-time schedules in the terminal components. Pecking one of the keys when both keys were white initiated a fixed time schedule on that key. A peck to the left key produced three stripes on the key. At the termination of the fixed-time component food always occurred. Pecking the other key produced either a circle or a triangle. If a circle appeared, reinforcement occurred. If a triangle appeared a brief timeout was given. Initially the stripes appeared on the left key and the circle and triangle on the left. This was reversed during the course of the experiment. In addition, sessions were conducted in which both circle and triangle sometimes preceded reinforcement and sometimes timeout. For most birds under most conditions there was a preference for the key that produced the circle and triangle. When these were uncorrelated with reinforcement and time out three of the birds preferred the key producing 100% reinforcement. In Experiment II three factors were varied and VI 20 sec schedules were used in the initial links instead of FR1. The results showed that pigeons preferred the 50% condition more 1) the greater the duration of the terminal links, 2) the smaller the value on the initial link VI schedules and 3) the less the probability of food in the terminal link with stripes on the key.

摘要

在实验一中,四只鸽子接受了并发链程序训练,初始成分采用固定比率时间表(FR1),终端成分采用固定时间时间表。当两个按键都为白色时啄其中一个按键,会在该按键上启动一个固定时间时间表。啄左边的按键会在按键上产生三条条纹。在固定时间成分结束时总会出现食物。啄另一个按键会产生一个圆形或一个三角形。如果出现圆形,就会得到强化。如果出现三角形,则会给予短暂的超时。最初,条纹出现在左边的按键上,圆形和三角形出现在右边。在实验过程中这一情况发生了逆转。此外,还进行了一些实验环节,其中圆形和三角形有时先于强化出现,有时先于超时出现。在大多数情况下,大多数鸟类更喜欢产生圆形和三角形的按键。当这些与强化和超时不相关时,三只鸟更喜欢产生100%强化的按键。在实验二中,改变了三个因素,初始环节采用了VI 20秒时间表,而不是FR1。结果表明,鸽子更倾向于50%的情况,具体如下:1)终端环节的持续时间越长;2)初始环节VI时间表的值越小;3)按键上有条纹的终端环节中食物出现的概率越低。

相似文献

1
A further study of choice and percentage reinforcement.关于选择与强化百分比的进一步研究。
Behav Processes. 1985 May;10(4):399-413. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(85)90040-3.
2
Psychological distance to reward: equating the number of stimulus and response segments.与奖励的心理距离:刺激与反应片段数量的等同
Behav Processes. 2004 May 31;66(2):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.01.003.
3
Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement.对多重与混合强化时间表的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jan;45(1):33-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-33.
4
Preference for intermittent reinforcement.偏好间歇性强化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):463-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-463.
5
Reinforcement omission in concurrent fixed-interval and random-interval schedules.并发固定间隔和随机间隔时间表中的强化遗漏
Behav Processes. 2007 Mar;74(3):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.12.004. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
6
Varying initial-link and terminal-link durations in concurrent-chains schedules: a comparison of three models.并发链程序中初始链和终端链持续时间的变化:三种模型的比较
Behav Processes. 2004 Jun 30;66(3):189-200. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.004.
7
The role of terminal-link stimuli in concurrent-chain schedules: revisited using a behavioral-history procedure.终端链接刺激在并发链程序中的作用:使用行为史程序的重新审视
Behav Processes. 2005 Aug 31;70(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.024. Epub 2005 Mar 19.
8
Mirror pecking and timeout under a multiple fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery.在多次固定比例的食物传递时间表下进行镜像啄食和超时。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Nov;34(3):319-28. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-319.
9
To peck or not peck: Which do pigeons prefer?啄还是不啄:鸽子更喜欢哪种?
Learn Behav. 2019 Sep;47(3):217-226. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0365-7.
10
On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.关于时间和强化物比例变化对偏好的联合控制
Behav Processes. 2013 May;95:100-12. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relevance of Operant Behavior in Conceptualizing the Psychological Well-Being of Captive Animals.操作性行为在圈养动物心理健康概念化中的相关性
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Aug 10;43(3):617-654. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00259-7. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
How suboptimal is suboptimal choice?次优选择有多不理想?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Jan;107(1):136-150. doi: 10.1002/jeab.239.
3
Signaled and unsignaled terminal links in concurrent chains I: effects of reinforcer probability and immediacy.并发链中的有信号和无信号终端链接 I:强化物概率和即时性的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):327-52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-327.