• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种用于衡量农业工人安全的安全决策情景。

Development of a safety decision-making scenario to measure worker safety in agriculture.

作者信息

Mosher G A, Keren N, Freeman S A, Hurburgh C R

出版信息

J Agric Saf Health. 2014 Apr;20(2):91-107.

PMID:24897917
Abstract

Human factors play an important role in the management of occupational safety, especially in high-hazard workplaces such as commercial grain-handling facilities. Employee decision-making patterns represent an essential component of the safety system within a work environment. This research describes the process used to create a safety decision-making scenario to measure the process that grain-handling employees used to make choices in a safety-related work task. A sample of 160 employees completed safety decision-making simulations based on a hypothetical but realistic scenario in a grain-handling environment. Their choices and the information they used to make their choices were recorded. Although the employees emphasized safety information in their decision-making process, not all of their choices were safe choices. Factors influencing their choices are discussed, and implications for industry, management, and workers are shared.

摘要

人为因素在职业安全管理中起着重要作用,尤其是在商业谷物处理设施等高危险工作场所。员工的决策模式是工作环境中安全系统的重要组成部分。本研究描述了创建安全决策情景以衡量谷物处理员工在安全相关工作任务中做出选择的过程。160名员工的样本基于谷物处理环境中的一个假设但现实的情景完成了安全决策模拟。记录了他们的选择以及他们用于做出选择的信息。尽管员工在决策过程中强调安全信息,但并非他们所有的选择都是安全选择。讨论了影响他们选择的因素,并分享了对行业、管理层和工人的启示。

相似文献

1
Development of a safety decision-making scenario to measure worker safety in agriculture.开发一种用于衡量农业工人安全的安全决策情景。
J Agric Saf Health. 2014 Apr;20(2):91-107.
2
Management of safety and quality and the relationship with employee decisions in country grain elevators.乡村谷仓的安全与质量管理及其与员工决策的关系。
J Agric Saf Health. 2012 Jul;18(3):195-215. doi: 10.13031/2013.41957.
3
Estimating the effect of selected predictors on agricultural confined-space hazard perceptions of Utah farm owner/operators.评估选定预测因素对犹他州农场主/经营者农业密闭空间危险认知的影响。
J Agric Saf Health. 2014 Apr;20(2):109-25.
4
Measuring determinants of occupational health related behavior in Flemish farmers: an application of the Theory of Planned Behavior.衡量弗拉芒农民职业健康相关行为的决定因素:计划行为理论的应用。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.12.001. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
5
Behavioral and nonbehavioral risk factors for occupational injuries and health problems among Belgian farmers.比利时农民职业伤害和健康问题的行为和非行为风险因素。
J Agromedicine. 2011 Oct;16(4):299-310. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2011.605709.
6
Measurement of worker perceptions of trust and safety climate in managers and supervisors at commercial grain elevators.对商业谷物升降机管理人员和主管中员工对信任及安全氛围认知的测量。
J Agric Saf Health. 2013 Apr;19(2):125-34. doi: 10.13031/jash.19.9977.
7
Promoting job safety for workers with intellectual disabilities: the staying safe at work training curriculum.促进智障工人的工作安全:工作场所安全培训课程
New Solut. 2011;21(4):591-601. doi: 10.2190/NS.21.4.g.
8
Assessment of Tribal Bison Worker Hazards Using Trusted Research Facilitators.利用可靠的研究促进者评估部落野牛工人的危害。
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):337-346. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1353937.
9
Agricultural health and safety: incorporating the worker perspective.农业卫生与安全:纳入工人视角。
J Agromedicine. 2010 Jul;15(3):192-9. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2010.486333.
10
Aging farmers are at high risk for injuries and fatalities: how human-factors research and application can help.老龄农民面临着受伤和死亡的高风险:人为因素研究与应用如何能提供帮助。
N C Med J. 2011 Nov-Dec;72(6):481-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors that Influence Farm Safety Decisions of Young Adults when Entering Agricultural Grain Bins.影响年轻成年人进入农业粮仓时农场安全决策的因素。
J Agric Saf Health. 2021 Jul 9;27(3):147-158. doi: 10.13031/jash.14450.