Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;120(14):2207-14. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28624. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
Accurate survival prediction is essential for decision-making in cancer therapies and care planning. Objective physiologic measures may improve the accuracy of prognostication. In this prospective study, the authors determined the association of phase angle, handgrip strength, and maximal inspiratory pressure with overall survival in patients with advanced cancer.
Hospitalized patients with advanced cancer who were seen by palliative care specialists for consultation were enrolled. Information regarding phase angle, handgrip strength, maximal inspiratory pressure, and known prognostic factors including the Palliative Prognostic Score, Palliative Prognostic Index, serum albumin, and body composition was collected. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis were performed, and the correlation between phase angle and other prognostic variables was examined.
A total of 222 patients were enrolled. The average age of the patients was 55 years (range, 22 years-79 years); 59% of the patients were female, with a mean Karnofsky performance status of 55 and a median overall survival of 106 days (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 71 days-128 days). The median survival for patients with phase angle 2 to 2.9°, 3 to 3.9°, 4 to 4.9°, 5 to 5.9° and ≥ 6° was 35 days, 54 days, 112 days, 134 days, and 220 days, respectively (P = .001). On multivariate analysis, phase angle (hazards ratio [HR], 0.86-per degree increase; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99 increase [P = .04]), Palliative Prognostic Score (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13 [P = .008]), serum albumin (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91 [P = .009]), and fat-free mass (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99 [P = .02]) were found to be significantly associated with survival. Phase angle was found to be only weakly (γ < 0.4) associated with other prognostic variables.
Phase angle was found to be a novel predictor of poor survival, independent of established prognostic factors, in the advanced cancer setting. This objective and noninvasive tool may be useful for bedside prognostication.
准确的生存预测对于癌症治疗和护理计划的决策至关重要。客观的生理指标可能会提高预后的准确性。在这项前瞻性研究中,作者确定了相位角、握力和最大吸气压力与晚期癌症患者总生存率的关系。
收入接受姑息治疗专家咨询的晚期癌症住院患者。收集了有关相位角、握力、最大吸气压力以及包括姑息预后评分、姑息预后指数、血清白蛋白和身体成分在内的已知预后因素的信息。进行了单变量和多变量生存分析,并检查了相位角与其他预后变量之间的相关性。
共纳入 222 例患者。患者的平均年龄为 55 岁(范围:22 岁-79 岁);59%的患者为女性,平均 Karnofsky 表现状态为 55,中位总生存期为 106 天(95%置信区间[95%CI],71 天-128 天)。相位角为 2 至 2.9°、3 至 3.9°、4 至 4.9°、5 至 5.9°和≥6°的患者中位生存期分别为 35 天、54 天、112 天、134 天和 220 天(P=0.001)。多变量分析显示,相位角(风险比[HR],每度增加 0.86;95%CI,0.74-0.99 增加[P=0.04])、姑息预后评分(HR,1.07;95%CI,1.02-1.13 [P=0.008])、血清白蛋白(HR,0.67;95%CI,0.50-0.91 [P=0.009])和去脂体重(HR,0.98;95%CI,0.96-0.99 [P=0.02])与生存显著相关。相位角与其他预后变量仅存在弱相关(γ<0.4)。
在晚期癌症患者中,相位角是独立于既定预后因素的不良生存的新预测指标。这种客观的非侵入性工具可能对床边预后具有预测价值。