• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与使用达芬奇S系统的微创远端胰腺切除术的比较。

Comparison of standard laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy using the da Vinci S system.

作者信息

Ito Masahiro, Asano Yukio, Shimizu Tomohiro, Uyama Ichiro, Horiguchi Akihiko

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Mar-Apr;61(130):493-6.

PMID:24901169
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Minimally invasive procedures for pancreatic pathologies are increasingly being used, including distal pancreatectomy. This study aimed to assess the indications for and outcomes of the da Vinci distal pancreatectomy procedure.

METHODOLOGY

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent pancreatic head resection from April 2009 to September 2013. Four patients (mean age, 52.7 years) underwent da Vinci distal pancreatectomy and 10 (mean age, 68.0 +/- 12.1 years) underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

RESULTS

The mean surgical duration was 292 +/- 153 min and 306 +/- 29 min, the mean blood loss was 153 +/- 71 mL and 61.7 +/- 72 mL, and the mean postoperative length of stay was 24 +/- 11 days and 14 +/- 3 days in the da Vinci distal pancreatectomy and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy groups, respectively. One patient who underwent da Vinci distal pancreatectomy developed a pancreatic fistula, while 2 patients in the laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy group developed splenic ischemia and gastric torsion, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic and robotic pancreatic resection were both safe and feasible in selected patients with distal pancreatic pathologies. Further studies are necessary to clarify the role of robotic surgery in the advanced laparoscopic era.

摘要

背景/目的:包括胰体尾切除术在内的胰腺疾病微创治疗方法正越来越多地被采用。本研究旨在评估达芬奇机器人胰体尾切除术的适应证及手术效果。

方法

我们回顾了2009年4月至2013年9月期间接受胰头切除术患者的病历。4例患者(平均年龄52.7岁)接受了达芬奇机器人胰体尾切除术,10例患者(平均年龄68.0±12.1岁)接受了腹腔镜胰体尾切除术。

结果

达芬奇机器人胰体尾切除术组和腹腔镜胰体尾切除术组的平均手术时间分别为292±153分钟和306±29分钟,平均失血量分别为153±71毫升和61.7±72毫升,平均术后住院时间分别为24±11天和14±3天。1例接受达芬奇机器人胰体尾切除术的患者发生了胰瘘,而腹腔镜胰体尾切除术组分别有2例患者发生了脾缺血和胃扭转。

结论

对于部分胰体尾疾病患者,腹腔镜和机器人胰腺切除术均安全可行。在先进的腹腔镜时代,有必要进一步研究以明确机器人手术的作用。

相似文献

1
Comparison of standard laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy using the da Vinci S system.标准腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与使用达芬奇S系统的微创远端胰腺切除术的比较。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Mar-Apr;61(130):493-6.
2
Robotic distal pancreatectomy versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study for short-term outcomes.机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术与传统腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术:短期疗效的比较研究
Front Med. 2015 Sep;9(3):356-60. doi: 10.1007/s11684-015-0404-0. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
3
First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.普通外科153例机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的第一年经验:适应症、技术与结果
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2009 Mar-Apr;104(2):141-50.
4
Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique.机器人辅助微创远端胰腺切除术优于腹腔镜技术。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):128-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fff08.
5
A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy.一项比较腹腔镜和机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术的前瞻性非随机单中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4043-3. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
6
Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center.机器人远端胰腺切除术的手术效果与腹腔镜和开放手术方法相似吗?来自单一医疗中心的比较研究。
Int J Med Robot. 2014 Sep;10(3):280-5. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1569. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
7
Robotic single-site plus ONE port distal pancreatectomy.机器人单部位加 ONE 端口远端胰腺切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4258-4259. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5476-2. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
8
Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP).腹腔镜保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术(LSPDP)。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 May;60(123):605-10. doi: 10.5754/hge12747.
9
Robotic distal pancreatectomy: a valid option?机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术:一个可行的选择?
Minerva Chir. 2013 Oct;68(5):489-97.
10
Robot-assisted laparoscopic middle pancreatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜中段胰腺切除术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Mar;20(2):135-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0296.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:一项包括患者亚组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4131-4143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09894-y. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Comparison of 3 Minimally Invasive Methods Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.三种微创方法与开腹胰体尾切除术的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Sep 2;31(1):104-112. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000846.
3
Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study.
机器人辅助与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗良性和低级别恶性胰腺肿瘤:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2255-2264. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07639-9. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术:最新的荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0301-3.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺良恶性病变的系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4078-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4723-7. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
6
Case-matched analysis of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic versus open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.胸腔镜-腹腔镜联合手术与开放食管切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的病例匹配分析
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):13516-23. eCollection 2015.
7
A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms.机器人辅助肝切除术的系统评价及机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝脏肿瘤的Meta分析。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):862-75. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4306-7. Epub 2015 Jun 20.