Afman Gregg, Garside Richard M, Dinan Neal, Gant Nicholas, Betts James A, Williams Clyde
Dept. of Kinesiology, Westmont College, Santa Barbara, CA.
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2014 Dec;24(6):632-44. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0168. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
Current recommendations for nutritional interventions in basketball are largely extrapolated from laboratory-based studies that are not sport-specific. We therefore adapted and validated a basketball simulation test relative to competitive basketball games using well-trained basketball players (n = 10), then employed this test to evaluate the effects of two common preexercise nutritional interventions on basketball-specific physical and skilled performance. Specifically, in a randomized and counterbalanced order, participants ingested solutions providing either 75 g carbohydrate (sucrose) 45 min before exercise (Study A; n = 10) or 2 × 0.2 g · kg(-1) sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) 90 and 20 min before exercise (Study B; n = 7), each relative to appropriate placebos (H2O and 2 × 0.14 g · kg(-1) NaCl, respectively). Heart rate, sweat rate, pedometer count, and perceived exertion did not systematically differ between the 60-min basketball simulation test and competitive basketball, with a strong positive correlation in heart rate response (r = .9, p < .001). Preexercise carbohydrate ingestion resulted in marked hypoglycemia (< 3.5 mmol · l(-1)) throughout the first quarter, coincident with impaired sprinting (+0.08 ± 0.05 second; p = .01) and layup shooting performance (8.5/11 versus 10.3/11 baskets; p < .01). However, ingestion of either carbohydrate or sodium bicarbonate before exercise offset fatigue such that sprinting performance was maintained into the final quarter relative to placebo (Study A: -0.07 ± 0.04 second; p < .01 and Study B: -0.08 ± 0.05 second; p = .02), although neither translated into improved skilled (layup shooting) performance. This basketball simulation test provides a valid reflection of physiological demands in competitive basketball and is sufficiently sensitive to detect meaningful changes in physical and skilled performance. While there are benefits of preexercise carbohydrate or sodium bicarbonate ingestion, these should be balanced against potential negative side effects.
目前针对篮球运动营养干预的建议,很大程度上是从并非针对该运动的实验室研究中推断而来的。因此,我们采用训练有素的篮球运动员(n = 10),针对竞技篮球比赛改编并验证了一项篮球模拟测试,然后运用该测试评估两种常见的运动前营养干预措施对篮球专项体能和技术表现的影响。具体而言,参与者按照随机且平衡的顺序,在运动前45分钟摄入提供75克碳水化合物(蔗糖)的溶液(研究A;n = 10),或在运动前90分钟和20分钟摄入2×0.2克·千克⁻¹的碳酸氢钠(NaHCO₃)(研究B;n = 7),每组均相对于相应的安慰剂(分别为水和2×0.14克·千克⁻¹的氯化钠)。在60分钟的篮球模拟测试和竞技篮球比赛中,心率、出汗率、计步器计数和主观用力程度没有系统性差异,心率反应呈强正相关(r = 0.9,p < 0.001)。运动前摄入碳水化合物导致整个第一节出现明显低血糖(< 3.5毫摩尔·升⁻¹),同时短跑成绩受损(+0.08 ± 0.05秒;p = 0.01),上篮投篮表现也受影响(8.5/11次投篮命中与10.3/11次;p < 0.01)。然而,运动前摄入碳水化合物或碳酸氢钠均可抵消疲劳,使得相对于安慰剂,短跑成绩在最后一节仍得以维持(研究A:-0.07 ± 0.04秒;p < 0.01;研究B:-0.08 ± 0.05秒;p = 0.02),尽管两者均未转化为技术(上篮投篮)表现的提升。这项篮球模拟测试能有效反映竞技篮球中的生理需求,并且对体能和技术表现的有意义变化具有足够的敏感性。虽然运动前摄入碳水化合物或碳酸氢钠有一定益处,但应权衡其潜在的负面副作用。