Gayet Surya, Van der Stigchel Stefan, Paffen Chris L E
Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2014 May 23;5:460. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00460. eCollection 2014.
Traditionally, interocular suppression is believed to disrupt high-level (i.e., semantic or conceptual) processing of the suppressed visual input. The development of a new experimental paradigm, breaking continuous flash suppression (b-CFS), has caused a resurgence of studies demonstrating high-level processing of visual information in the absence of visual awareness. In this method the time it takes for interocularly suppressed stimuli to breach the threshold of visibility, is regarded as a measure of access to awareness. The aim of the current review is twofold. First, we provide an overview of the literature using this b-CFS method, while making a distinction between two types of studies: those in which suppression durations are compared between different stimulus classes (such as upright faces versus inverted faces), and those in which suppression durations are compared for stimuli that either match or mismatch concurrently available information (such as a colored target that either matches or mismatches a color retained in working memory). Second, we aim at dissociating high-level processing from low-level (i.e., crude visual) processing of the suppressed stimuli. For this purpose, we include a thorough review of the control conditions that are used in these experiments. Additionally, we provide recommendations for proper control conditions that we deem crucial for disentangling high-level from low-level effects. Based on this review, we argue that crude visual processing suffices for explaining differences in breakthrough times reported using b-CFS. As such, we conclude that there is as yet no reason to assume that interocularly suppressed stimuli receive full semantic analysis.
传统上,双眼间抑制被认为会干扰被抑制视觉输入的高级(即语义或概念性)处理。一种新的实验范式——打破连续闪光抑制(b-CFS)的出现,引发了一系列研究热潮,这些研究表明在没有视觉意识的情况下也能进行视觉信息的高级处理。在这种方法中,双眼间被抑制的刺激突破可见阈值所需的时间,被视为衡量意识通达的指标。本综述的目的有两个。首先,我们概述使用这种b-CFS方法的文献,同时区分两种类型的研究:一种是比较不同刺激类别(如正立面孔与倒立面孔)之间的抑制持续时间;另一种是比较与同时可用信息匹配或不匹配的刺激(如与工作记忆中保留的颜色匹配或不匹配的彩色目标)的抑制持续时间。其次,我们旨在区分被抑制刺激的高级处理和低级(即粗略视觉)处理。为此,我们全面回顾了这些实验中使用的控制条件。此外,我们为适当的控制条件提供建议,我们认为这些条件对于区分高级和低级效应至关重要。基于这一综述,我们认为粗略视觉处理足以解释使用b-CFS报告的突破时间差异。因此,我们得出结论,目前没有理由假设双眼间被抑制的刺激会接受完整的语义分析。