• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient preferences for side effects associated with cervical cancer treatment.患者对宫颈癌治疗相关副作用的偏好。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Jul;24(6):1077-84. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000149.
2
Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.接受开腹与微创根治性子宫切除术(LACC)的宫颈癌患者的生活质量:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、3 期、非劣效性试验的次要结局。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):851-860. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30081-4.
3
Rankings and symptom assessments of side effects from chemotherapy: insights from experienced patients with ovarian cancer.化疗副作用的排名及症状评估:来自卵巢癌经验丰富患者的见解
Support Care Cancer. 2005 Apr;13(4):219-27. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0710-6. Epub 2004 Nov 9.
4
Do visual analogue scale (VAS) derived standard gamble (SG) utilities agree with Health Utilities Index utilities? A comparison of patient and community preferences for health status in rheumatoid arthritis patients.视觉模拟量表(VAS)得出的标准博弈(SG)效用与健康效用指数效用是否一致?类风湿性关节炎患者对健康状况的患者和社区偏好比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Apr 20;4:25. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-25.
5
Validity, feasibility and acceptability of time trade-off and standard gamble assessments in health valuation studies: a study in a multiethnic Asian population in Singapore.健康评估研究中时间权衡法和标准博弈法评估的有效性、可行性及可接受性:新加坡多民族亚洲人群的一项研究
Value Health. 2008 Mar;11 Suppl 1:S3-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00361.x.
6
Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈癌患者健康状态效用测量的比较
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Aug;141(8):696-703. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.1314.
7
Sexual function after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术后的性功能
J Sex Med. 2007 Nov;4(6):1659-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00454.x. Epub 2007 Apr 13.
8
Quality of life in cervical cancer survivors: patient and provider perspectives on common complications of cervical cancer and treatment.宫颈癌幸存者的生活质量:患者和提供者对宫颈癌常见并发症及治疗的看法。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):163-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.033. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
9
Pathological Risk Factors and Outcomes in Women With Stage IB2 Cervical Cancer Treated With Primary Radical Surgery Versus Chemoradiotherapy.I B2期宫颈癌患者接受根治性手术与放化疗的病理危险因素及预后
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Oct;25(8):1476-83. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000513.
10
A retrospective review of patients with stage IB2 cervical cancer treated with radical radiation versus radical surgery as a primary modality.对以根治性放疗和根治性手术作为主要治疗方式的 IB2 期宫颈癌患者进行回顾性分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Sep;23(7):1287-94. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31829fb834.

引用本文的文献

1
Cuban American Perspectives on Sexual Dysfunction Following Pelvic Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study.古巴裔美国人对盆腔放疗后性功能障碍的看法:一项定性研究。
Sex Disabil. 2023 Dec;41(4):757-768. doi: 10.1007/s11195-023-09812-z. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Anticancer action of naturally occurring emodin for the controlling of cervical cancer.天然大黄素对宫颈癌的抗癌作用
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2023;4(4):690-698. doi: 10.37349/etat.2023.00161. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
3
Cervical cancer management in Zimbabwe (2019-2020).津巴布韦宫颈癌管理(2019-2020 年)。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 21;17(9):e0274884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274884. eCollection 2022.
4
Enhanced Anti-Cancer Effects of Conditioned Medium from Hypoxic Human Adult Dermal Fibroblasts on Cervical Cancer Cells.低氧人成纤维细胞条件培养液增强对宫颈癌的抗癌作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 May 4;23(9):5134. doi: 10.3390/ijms23095134.
5
Human papillomavirus infection, cervical cancer and the less explored role of trace elements.人乳头瘤病毒感染、宫颈癌与微量元素的作用
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2023 Mar;201(3):1026-1050. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03226-2. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
6
Impact of cervical cancer on the sexual and physical health of women diagnosed with cervical cancer in Ghana: A qualitative phenomenological study.加纳宫颈癌患者的宫颈癌对其性健康和身体健康的影响:一项定性现象学研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211066075. doi: 10.1177/17455065211066075.
7
The Fact of Return to Work in Cervical Cancer Survivors and the Impact of Survival Rate: An 11-Year Follow-Up Study.宫颈癌幸存者的工作回归事实和生存率的影响:一项 11 年随访研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10703. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010703.
8
Therapeutic Potential of Natural Products in Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Review.天然产物在宫颈癌治疗中的治疗潜力:综述
Nutrients. 2021 Jan 5;13(1):154. doi: 10.3390/nu13010154.
9
Women's preferences for cancer risk management strategies in Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征中女性对癌症风险管理策略的偏好。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;152(3):514-521. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.027.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life in cervical cancer survivors: patient and provider perspectives on common complications of cervical cancer and treatment.宫颈癌幸存者的生活质量:患者和提供者对宫颈癌常见并发症及治疗的看法。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):163-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.033. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
2
What women want. Women's preferences for the management of low-grade abnormal cervical screening tests: a systematic review.女性的需求。女性对低级别异常宫颈筛查试验管理的偏好:系统评价。
BJOG. 2012 Jan;119(1):7-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03130.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
3
Utility scores and treatment preferences for clinical early-stage cervical cancer.临床早期宫颈癌的效用评分和治疗偏好。
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):582-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.017. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
4
Racial variation in willingness to trade financial resources for life-prolonging cancer treatment.不同种族对用财务资源换取延长癌症治疗时间的意愿差异。
Cancer. 2011 Aug 1;117(15):3476-84. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25839. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
5
Preferences for surveillance strategies for women treated for high-grade precancerous cervical lesions.治疗高级别癌前宫颈病变女性的监测策略偏好。
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;118(2):108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.05.002.
6
Racial and ethnic differences in hospice use among patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者临终关怀使用方面的种族和族裔差异。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 8;170(5):427-32. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.547.
7
The impact of radiotherapy late effects on quality of life in gynaecological cancer patients.放射治疗晚期效应对妇科癌症患者生活质量的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2009 May 19;100(10):1558-65. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605050. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
8
Response shift: a brief overview and proposed research priorities.反应转移:简要概述与拟议的研究重点
Qual Life Res. 2009 Apr;18(3):335-46. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9450-x. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
9
Determination of quality of life-related utilities for health states relevant to ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment.确定与卵巢癌诊断和治疗相关健康状态的生活质量相关效用值。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 May;113(2):216-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.026. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
10
Health-related quality of life in cervical cancer survivors: a population-based survey.宫颈癌幸存者的健康相关生活质量:一项基于人群的调查。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Apr 1;73(5):1501-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1905. Epub 2008 Sep 25.

患者对宫颈癌治疗相关副作用的偏好。

Patient preferences for side effects associated with cervical cancer treatment.

作者信息

Sun Charlotte, Brown Alaina J, Jhingran Anuja, Frumovitz Michael, Ramondetta Lois, Bodurka Diane C

机构信息

Departments of *Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine and †Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Jul;24(6):1077-84. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000149.

DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000000149
PMID:24905618
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4287264/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess patient preferences regarding side effects associated with cervical cancer treatment.

METHODS/MATERIALS: The visual analog scale (VAS) and modified standard gamble (SG) were used to elicit preferences of women with no evidence of disease after primary treatment of cervical cancer. Higher scores on VAS and SG indicated more favorable ratings for a given health state. Health states (HS) included vaginal shortening, diarrhea, dietary changes, menopause, moderate nausea/vomiting, rectal bleeding, sexual dysfunction, and urinary self-catheterization. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests and correlation coefficients were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients participated in the study. Median age was 44.1 years (range, 24.9-67.8 years). Median time since treatment completion was 31.2 months (range, 1.0-113.3 months). The HSs rated as most favorable by VAS were also rated as most favorable by SG. Increasing age was associated with higher VAS scores for menopause and vaginal shortening (P = 0.04 and 0.036). African Americans had higher VAS scores for dietary changes (P = 0.05), sexual dysfunction (P = 0.028), and diarrhea (P = 0.05) when compared with Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients. Women receiving radiation had more favorable VAS scores for menopause compared with women undergoing radical hysterectomy (P = 0.05). Women receiving chemotherapy rated urinary self-catheterization less favorably by VAS score compared with those not receiving chemotherapy (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple demographic and clinical factors influence the severity of treatment-related adverse effects perceived by women surviving cervical cancer. A better understanding of factors influencing patient preferences regarding treatment side effects will allow providers to formulate care better tailored to the individual desires of each patient.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估患者对宫颈癌治疗相关副作用的偏好。

方法/材料:采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和改良标准博弈法(SG)来获取宫颈癌初次治疗后无疾病证据的女性的偏好。VAS和SG得分越高表明对特定健康状态的评价越有利。健康状态(HS)包括阴道缩短、腹泻、饮食改变、绝经、中度恶心/呕吐、直肠出血、性功能障碍和自行导尿。采用描述性统计、Kruskal-Wallis检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和相关系数进行统计分析。

结果

78名患者参与了本研究。中位年龄为44.1岁(范围24.9 - 67.8岁)。治疗结束后的中位时间为31.2个月(范围1.0 - 113.3个月)。VAS评定为最有利的健康状态在SG中也被评定为最有利。年龄增加与绝经和阴道缩短的VAS得分较高相关(P = 0.04和0.036)。与西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人患者相比,非裔美国人在饮食改变(P = 0.05)、性功能障碍(P = 0.028)和腹泻(P = 0.05)方面的VAS得分更高。与接受根治性子宫切除术的女性相比,接受放疗的女性在绝经方面的VAS得分更有利(P = 0.05)。与未接受化疗的女性相比,接受化疗的女性对自行导尿的VAS评分较低(P = 0.045)。

结论

多种人口统计学和临床因素影响宫颈癌存活女性所感知的治疗相关不良反应的严重程度。更好地了解影响患者对治疗副作用偏好的因素将使医疗服务提供者能够制定更符合每位患者个人需求的护理方案。