• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干预问题的系统评价(二):相关性筛选、数据提取、评估偏倚风险、呈现结果及解读研究发现

Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions II: Relevance screening, data extraction, assessing risk of bias, presenting the results and interpreting the findings.

作者信息

Sargeant J M, O'Connor A M

机构信息

Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Jun;61 Suppl 1:39-51. doi: 10.1111/zph.12124.

DOI:10.1111/zph.12124
PMID:24905995
Abstract

This is the fifth in a series of six articles describing systematic reviews in animal agriculture and veterinary medicine. The previous articles in this series overviewed the development of a review protocol and the initial steps in conducting a systematic review: identification of a structured question to be answered and conducting a comprehensive literature search to find potentially relevant original research to address the review question. This article describes relevance screening of literature identified in the search to determine which of the original research articles are relevant to the review question, data extraction from primary research studies, the use of standardized procedures to assess the risk of bias in the relevant research studies, presenting the results of the body of research identified and interpreting these results.

摘要

这是关于动物农业和兽医学系统评价的系列六篇文章中的第五篇。本系列的前几篇文章概述了综述方案的制定以及进行系统评价的初始步骤:确定要回答的结构化问题,并进行全面的文献检索以找到可能与综述问题相关的原始研究。本文描述了对检索到的文献进行相关性筛选,以确定哪些原始研究文章与综述问题相关,从原始研究中提取数据,使用标准化程序评估相关研究中的偏倚风险,呈现所确定的研究主体的结果并解释这些结果。

相似文献

1
Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions II: Relevance screening, data extraction, assessing risk of bias, presenting the results and interpreting the findings.干预问题的系统评价(二):相关性筛选、数据提取、评估偏倚风险、呈现结果及解读研究发现
Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Jun;61 Suppl 1:39-51. doi: 10.1111/zph.12124.
2
Introduction to systematic reviews in animal agriculture and veterinary medicine.动物农业与兽医学系统评价导论。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Jun;61 Suppl 1:3-9. doi: 10.1111/zph.12128.
3
Study designs and systematic reviews of interventions: building evidence across study designs.研究设计与干预措施的系统评价:跨越研究设计构建证据
Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Jun;61 Suppl 1:10-7. doi: 10.1111/zph.12127.
4
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.在MEDLINE和EMBASE中识别诊断准确性研究的检索策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3.
5
The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities.知识综合方法在农业食品公共卫生中的应用:最新进展、挑战与机遇。
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Mar 1;113(4):339-55. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
6
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
7
Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions III: Synthesizing data from intervention studies using meta-analysis.干预问题的系统评价(三):使用荟萃分析综合干预研究的数据
Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Jun;61 Suppl 1:52-63. doi: 10.1111/zph.12123.
8
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
9
Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.应使用哪些资源来识别用于系统评价的随机对照试验/对照临床试验:一项系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Aug 10;5:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-24.
10
Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach.不良反应的系统评价:结构化方法框架
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jul 5;7:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-32.

引用本文的文献

1
The case for development of a core outcome set (COS) and supplemental reporting guidelines for influenza vaccine challenge trial research in swine.关于制定猪流感疫苗攻毒试验研究的核心结局集(COS)和补充报告指南的理由。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Feb 11;12:1465926. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1465926. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of methane mitigation strategies on the native ruminant microbiome: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.甲烷减排策略对本土反刍动物微生物组的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 22;19(8):e0308914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308914. eCollection 2024.
3
Extraosseous Ewing Sarcoma in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinicodemographic Characteristics.
儿童骨外尤文肉瘤:临床人口统计学特征的系统评价和荟萃分析
Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;9(12):1859. doi: 10.3390/children9121859.
4
Effect of prebiotics on growth and health of dairy calves: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.益生元对奶牛犊牛生长和健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0253379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253379. eCollection 2021.
5
Meta-analysis of the effects of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregation on birth outcome.内质网形态聚集对出生结局影响的荟萃分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 12;21(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03850-1.
6
Outdoor Walking Speeds of Apparently Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.健康成年人户外行走速度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2021 Jan;51(1):125-141. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01351-3.
7
Zoonotic Pathogens of Dromedary Camels in Kenya: A Systematised Review.肯尼亚单峰骆驼的人畜共患病原体:一项系统综述
Vet Sci. 2020 Aug 5;7(3):103. doi: 10.3390/vetsci7030103.
8
Mobile Health for Pediatric Weight Management: Systematic Scoping Review.移动医疗在儿科体重管理中的应用:系统范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 3;8(6):e16214. doi: 10.2196/16214.
9
A Scoping Review: The Impact of Housing Systems and Environmental Features on Beef Cattle Welfare.一项范围综述:饲养系统和环境特征对肉牛福利的影响
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 27;10(4):565. doi: 10.3390/ani10040565.
10
Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews, and Meta-Analysis: Applications in Veterinary Medicine.综述、系统评价和荟萃分析:在兽医学中的应用
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 28;7:11. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00011. eCollection 2020.