Hughes Ellen Clare, Anderson Neil Euan
The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and the Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Roslin EH25 9RG, UK.
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Henry Wellcome Building, Garscube Campus, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK.
Vet Sci. 2020 Aug 5;7(3):103. doi: 10.3390/vetsci7030103.
Kenya is home to Africa's third largest population of dromedary camels, and production at commercial and local levels are increasingly important. In pastoral and nomadic communities in the arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs), camels play a vital role in food security, while commercial milk production and formalized export markets are rapidly emerging as camel populations expand into non-traditional areas. Until recently, little focus was placed on camels as hosts of zoonotic disease, but the emergence of Middle Eastern respiratory coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012, and the discovery of exposure to the virus in Kenyan camels, highlighted the need for further understanding of this area. This systematised review utilised a robust search strategy to assess the occurrence of camel-associated zoonoses in Kenya and to evaluate the quality of the published literature. Seventy-four studies were identified, covering sixteen pathogens, with an increasing number of good quality studies in recent years. Despite this, the area remains under-researched and there is a lack of robust, high-quality research. Trypanosome spp., and spp. appeared most frequently in the literature. Pathogens with the highest reported prevalence were MERS-CoV (0-100%), (7-60%) and Rift Valley fever virus (7-57%). Exposure to spp., and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus showed higher levels in camel or camel-associated vectors than other livestock species, although brucellosis was the only disease for which there was robust evidence linking camel and human exposure. Zoonotic agents with less severe human health outcomes, such as and contagious ecthyma, were also represented in the literature. This review provides an important summary of the scope and quality of current knowledge. It demonstrates that further research, and improved adherence to robust study design and reporting are essential if the zoonotic risk from camels in Kenya, and elsewhere, is to be better understood.
肯尼亚是非洲单峰骆驼数量第三多的国家,商业和地方层面的骆驼养殖日益重要。在干旱和半干旱地区(ASALs)的牧民和游牧社区,骆驼在粮食安全方面发挥着至关重要的作用,随着骆驼种群向非传统地区扩展,商业牛奶生产和正规出口市场也迅速兴起。直到最近,人们很少关注骆驼作为人畜共患病宿主的情况,但2012年中东呼吸冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)的出现,以及在肯尼亚骆驼中发现接触该病毒的情况,凸显了进一步了解这一领域的必要性。这项系统综述采用了强有力的搜索策略,以评估肯尼亚与骆驼相关的人畜共患病的发生情况,并评估已发表文献的质量。共识别出74项研究,涵盖16种病原体,近年来高质量研究的数量不断增加。尽管如此,该领域的研究仍然不足,缺乏有力的、高质量的研究。锥虫属和巴贝斯虫属在文献中出现的频率最高。报告患病率最高的病原体是MERS-CoV(0 - 100%)、巴贝斯虫属(7 - 60%)和裂谷热病毒(7 - 57%)。与其他家畜物种相比,骆驼或与骆驼相关的媒介接触巴贝斯虫属、泰勒虫属和克里米亚 - 刚果出血热病毒的水平更高,尽管布鲁氏菌病是唯一有确凿证据表明骆驼与人类接触有关的疾病。文献中也提到了对人类健康影响较小的人畜共患病原体,如沙门氏菌和传染性脓疱病。本综述对当前知识的范围和质量进行了重要总结。它表明,如果要更好地了解肯尼亚及其他地方骆驼带来的人畜共患病风险,进一步的研究以及更好地遵循有力的研究设计和报告规范至关重要。