• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格相关性(行为激活系统-行为抑制系统)、社会等级自我认知以及同龄人比较中的皮质(阿尔法频段)调制

Personality correlates (BAS-BIS), self-perception of social ranking, and cortical (alpha frequency band) modulation in peer-group comparison.

作者信息

Balconi Michela, Pagani Silvia

机构信息

Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy; Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience.

Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2014 Jun 22;133:207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.043. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.043
PMID:24907694
Abstract

The perception and interpretation of social hierarchies are a key part of our social life. In the present research we considered the activation of cortical areas, mainly the prefrontal cortex, related to social ranking perception in conjunction with some personality components (BAS - Behavioral Activation System - and BIS - Behavioral Inhibition System). In two experiments we manipulated the perceived superior/inferior status during a competitive cognitive task. Indeed, we created an explicit and strongly reinforced social hierarchy based on incidental rating in an attentional task. Specifically, a peer group comparison was undertaken and improved (Experiment 1) or decreased (Experiment 2) performance was artificially manipulated by the experimenter. For each experiment two groups were compared, based on a BAS and BIS dichotomy. Alpha band modulation in prefrontal cortex, behavioral measures (performance: error rate, ER; response times, RTs), and self-perceived ranking were considered. Repeated measures ANOVAs and regression analyses showed in Experiment 1 a significant improved cognitive performance (decreased ER and RTs) and higher self-perceived ranking in high-BAS participants. Moreover, their prefrontal activity was increased within the left side (alpha band decreasing). Conversely, in Experiment 2 a significant decreased cognitive performance (increased ER and RTs) and lower self-perceived ranking was observed in higher-BIS participants. Their prefrontal right activity was increased in comparison with higher BAS. The regression analyses confirmed the significant predictive role of alpha band modulation with respect of subjects' performance and self-perception of social ranking, differently for BAS/BIS components. The present results suggest that social status perception is directly modulated by cortical activity and personality correlates.

摘要

对社会等级制度的认知和解读是我们社会生活的关键部分。在本研究中,我们考虑了与社会等级认知相关的皮质区域(主要是前额叶皮质)的激活情况,并结合了一些人格成分(行为激活系统 - BAS - 和行为抑制系统 - BIS)。在两个实验中,我们在竞争性认知任务期间操纵了感知到的优越/ inferior 地位。事实上,我们基于注意力任务中的偶然评分创建了一个明确且强化的社会等级制度。具体而言,进行了同伴群体比较,实验者人为地操纵了表现的提高(实验 1)或降低(实验 2)。对于每个实验,基于 BAS 和 BIS 的二分法比较了两组。考虑了前额叶皮质的阿尔法波段调制、行为测量指标(表现:错误率,ER;反应时间,RT)以及自我感知的等级。重复测量方差分析和回归分析表明,在实验 1 中,高 BAS 参与者的认知表现显著提高(ER 和 RT 降低)且自我感知等级更高。此外,他们左侧的前额叶活动增强(阿尔法波段降低)。相反,在实验 2 中,高 BIS 参与者的认知表现显著下降(ER 和 RT 增加)且自我感知等级较低。与高 BAS 参与者相比,他们右侧的前额叶活动增强。回归分析证实了阿尔法波段调制对受试者表现和社会等级自我感知的显著预测作用,对于 BAS/BIS 成分而言有所不同。目前的结果表明,社会地位感知直接受到皮质活动和人格相关性的调节。

相似文献

1
Personality correlates (BAS-BIS), self-perception of social ranking, and cortical (alpha frequency band) modulation in peer-group comparison.人格相关性(行为激活系统-行为抑制系统)、社会等级自我认知以及同龄人比较中的皮质(阿尔法频段)调制
Physiol Behav. 2014 Jun 22;133:207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.043. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
2
Social hierarchies and emotions: cortical prefrontal activity, facial feedback (EMG), and cognitive performance in a dynamic interaction.社会等级制度与情绪:动态互动中的前额叶皮质活动、面部反馈(肌电图)及认知表现
Soc Neurosci. 2015 Apr;10(2):166-78. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.977403. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
3
Why to cooperate is better than to compete: brain and personality components.为何合作优于竞争:大脑与个性因素
BMC Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12868-017-0386-8.
4
Relations among EEG-alpha asymmetry, BIS/BAS, and dispositional optimism.脑电图阿尔法不对称性、BIS/BAS 与性格乐观倾向的关系。
Biol Psychol. 2013 Sep;94(1):198-209. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
5
Competition in the Brain. The Contribution of EEG and fNIRS Modulation and Personality Effects in Social Ranking.大脑中的竞争。脑电图(EEG)和功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)调制以及社会排名中人格效应的作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01587. eCollection 2016.
6
Deficit in rewarding mechanisms and prefrontal left/right cortical effect in vulnerability for internet addiction.奖励机制缺陷和前额叶左/右侧皮质对网络成瘾易感性的影响。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2016 Oct;28(5):272-85. doi: 10.1017/neu.2016.9. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
7
The relation of cortical activity and BIS/BAS on the trait level.特质水平上皮质活动与行为抑制系统/行为激活系统的关系。
Biol Psychol. 2006 Jan;71(1):42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.01.006. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
8
Lateralisation effect in comprehension of emotional facial expression: a comparison between EEG alpha band power and behavioural inhibition (BIS) and activation (BAS) systems.情绪面部表情理解中的侧化效应:脑电图α波段功率与行为抑制(BIS)和激活(BAS)系统的比较。
Laterality. 2010 May;15(3):361-84. doi: 10.1080/13576500902886056. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
9
Left Hemispheric Imbalance and Reward Mechanisms Affect Gambling Behavior: The Contribution of the Metacognition and Cortical Brain Oscillations.左半球失衡与奖励机制影响赌博行为:元认知与皮层脑振荡的作用
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2015 Jul;46(3):197-207. doi: 10.1177/1550059413513261. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
10
BIS/BAS, cortical oscillations and coherence in response to emotional cues.双频指数/脑干听觉诱发电位、皮质振荡以及对情绪线索的反应中的相干性。
Brain Res Bull. 2009 Sep 28;80(3):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurocognitive functions of prosocial and unsocial incongruency information during language comprehension: evidence from time-frequency analysis of EEG signals.语言理解过程中亲社会和非亲社会不一致信息的神经认知功能:来自 EEG 信号时频分析的证据。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Apr;60(4):1033-1053. doi: 10.1007/s11517-022-02528-w. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
2
When gratitude and cooperation between friends affect inter-brain connectivity for EEG.当朋友之间的感激和合作影响 EEG 的大脑间连通性时。
BMC Neurosci. 2020 Apr 7;21(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12868-020-00563-7.
3
The "gift effect" on functional brain connectivity. Inter-brain synchronization when prosocial behavior is in action.
大脑功能连接的“馈赠效应”。亲社会行为作用时的大脑间同步。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 25;10(1):5394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62421-0.
4
A gift for gratitude and cooperative behavior: brain and cognitive effects.感恩与合作行为的礼物:大脑与认知的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Dec 30;14(12):1317-1327. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa003.
5
Functional EEG connectivity during competition.比赛期间的功能性脑电图连接性。
BMC Neurosci. 2018 Oct 18;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12868-018-0464-6.
6
Cooperate or not cooperate EEG, autonomic, and behavioral correlates of ineffective joint strategies.合作或不合作:无效关节策略的 EEG、自主和行为相关性。
Brain Behav. 2018 Jan 5;8(2):e00902. doi: 10.1002/brb3.902. eCollection 2018 Feb.
7
Affective Synchrony and Autonomic Coupling during Cooperation: A Hyperscanning Study.合作过程中的情感同步和自主耦合:一项超扫描研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3104564. doi: 10.1155/2017/3104564. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
8
Two is better than one: The effects of strategic cooperation on intra- and inter-brain connectivity by fNIRS.两人比一人强:功能近红外光谱技术研究战略合作对脑内及脑间连接性的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 16;12(11):e0187652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187652. eCollection 2017.
9
Cooperation and Competition with Hyperscanning Methods: Review and Future Application to Emotion Domain.超扫描方法的合作与竞争:综述及在情感领域的未来应用
Front Comput Neurosci. 2017 Sep 29;11:86. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2017.00086. eCollection 2017.
10
Why to cooperate is better than to compete: brain and personality components.为何合作优于竞争:大脑与个性因素
BMC Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12868-017-0386-8.