• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左半球失衡与奖励机制影响赌博行为:元认知与皮层脑振荡的作用

Left Hemispheric Imbalance and Reward Mechanisms Affect Gambling Behavior: The Contribution of the Metacognition and Cortical Brain Oscillations.

作者信息

Balconi Michela, Finocchiaro Roberta, Canavesio Ylenia

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy

Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Clin EEG Neurosci. 2015 Jul;46(3):197-207. doi: 10.1177/1550059413513261. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1177/1550059413513261
PMID:24677014
Abstract

The present research used the Iowa Gambling Task to test the effect of the reward-sensitivity Behavioral Activation System-Reward (BAS-Reward) construct on the ability to distinguish between high- and low-risk decisions. To elucidate the individual differences that influence the decisional processes, making the strategies more or less advantageous, we considered the impact of the BAS motivational system and the frontal left and right cortical activity on subjects' decisions. More specifically, the lateralization effect, which is related to the increased activation of the left (BAS-Reward-related) hemisphere, was explored by using frequency band analysis. Specifically, behavioral responses (gain/loss options), metacognition, and delta, theta, alpha, and beta band modulation (asymmetry index) were considered. Thirty subjects were divided into high-BAS and low-BAS groups. In comparison with low-BAS, the high-BAS group showed an increased tendency to opt in favor of the immediate reward (losing strategy) instead of the long-term option (winning strategy), and members of this group were more impaired in metacognitive monitoring of their strategies and showed an increased left hemisphere activation when they responded to losing choices. A "reward bias" effect was hypothesized to act for high BAS, based on a left-hemisphere hyperactivation.

摘要

本研究采用爱荷华赌博任务来测试奖励敏感性行为激活系统-奖励(BAS-奖励)结构对区分高风险和低风险决策能力的影响。为了阐明影响决策过程的个体差异,使策略或多或少具有优势,我们考虑了BAS动机系统以及额叶左右皮质活动对受试者决策的影响。更具体地说,通过使用频带分析来探索与左半球(与BAS-奖励相关)激活增加有关的偏侧化效应。具体而言,考虑了行为反应(收益/损失选项)、元认知以及δ、θ、α和β波段调制(不对称指数)。30名受试者被分为高BAS组和低BAS组。与低BAS组相比,高BAS组表现出更倾向于选择即时奖励(输的策略)而非长期选项(赢的策略)的趋势,并且该组成员在对其策略的元认知监测方面受损更严重,并且在对输的选择做出反应时左半球激活增加。基于左半球过度激活,假设高BAS存在“奖励偏差”效应。

相似文献

1
Left Hemispheric Imbalance and Reward Mechanisms Affect Gambling Behavior: The Contribution of the Metacognition and Cortical Brain Oscillations.左半球失衡与奖励机制影响赌博行为:元认知与皮层脑振荡的作用
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2015 Jul;46(3):197-207. doi: 10.1177/1550059413513261. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
2
Reward bias and lateralization in gambling behavior: behavioral activation system and alpha band analysis.赌博行为中的奖励偏向和侧化:行为激活系统和 alpha 波段分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Nov 30;219(3):570-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.06.020. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
3
Reward-system effect (BAS rating), left hemispheric "unbalance" (alpha band oscillations) and decisional impairments in drug addiction.奖励系统效应(BAS 评分)、左侧半球“失衡”(α 波段振荡)与药物成瘾中的决策障碍。
Addict Behav. 2014 Jun;39(6):1026-32. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
4
Reward Sensitivity (Behavioral Activation System), Cognitive, and Metacognitive Control in Gambling Behavior: Evidences From Behavioral, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P300 Effect.赌博行为中的奖励敏感性(行为激活系统)、认知及元认知控制:来自行为、反馈相关负波和P300效应的证据
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015 Summer;27(3):219-27. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.14070165. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
5
Decisional impairments in cocaine addiction, reward bias, and cortical oscillation "unbalance".可卡因成瘾、奖励偏差和皮质振荡“失衡”中的决策障碍
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Mar 20;11:777-86. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S79696. eCollection 2015.
6
Reward sensitivity, decisional bias, and metacognitive deficits in cocaine drug addiction.可卡因成瘾中的奖赏敏感性、决策偏差和元认知缺陷。
J Addict Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;8(6):399-406. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000065.
7
Deficit in rewarding mechanisms and prefrontal left/right cortical effect in vulnerability for internet addiction.奖励机制缺陷和前额叶左/右侧皮质对网络成瘾易感性的影响。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2016 Oct;28(5):272-85. doi: 10.1017/neu.2016.9. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
8
Theta-band oscillatory activity differs between gamblers and nongamblers comorbid with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in a probabilistic reward-learning task.在概率性奖励学习任务中,伴有注意力缺陷多动障碍的赌博者与非赌博者之间的θ波段振荡活动存在差异。
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Oct 1;312:195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.06.031. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
Personality correlates (BAS-BIS), self-perception of social ranking, and cortical (alpha frequency band) modulation in peer-group comparison.人格相关性(行为激活系统-行为抑制系统)、社会等级自我认知以及同龄人比较中的皮质(阿尔法频段)调制
Physiol Behav. 2014 Jun 22;133:207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.043. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
10
Gambling behavior in Parkinson's Disease: Impulsivity, reward mechanism and cortical brain oscillations.帕金森病患者的赌博行为:冲动性、奖励机制和皮质脑振荡。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:974-980. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.041. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Impaired Interference Control in Individuals With Internet Addiction: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials and Brain Oscillations.网络成瘾个体的干扰控制受损:来自事件相关电位和脑振荡的证据。
Addict Biol. 2025 Jul;30(7):e70062. doi: 10.1111/adb.70062.
2
Interference Control Under the Stroop Task and Brain Oscillatory Activity among Internet Addicts Compared to Non-addicts.与非网络成瘾者相比,网络成瘾者在Stroop任务下的干扰控制及脑振荡活动
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2024 Sep-Oct;15(5):631-648. doi: 10.32598/bcn.2023.4974.1. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
3
Integrating EEG biomarkers in the neurocognitive screening of executive functions in substance and behavioral addiction.
将脑电图生物标志物整合到物质与行为成瘾的执行功能神经认知筛查中。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 19;15:1472565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1472565. eCollection 2024.
4
Neural responses to decision-making in suicide attempters with youth major depressive disorder.青少年重性抑郁障碍自杀未遂者决策的神经反应。
Neuroimage Clin. 2024;43:103667. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103667. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
5
The influence of positive affect on sensitivity to important omissions.积极情感对重要遗漏敏感性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 8;13:992489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992489. eCollection 2022.
6
The effect of strategy game types on inhibition.策略游戏类型对抑制的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Oct;86(7):2115-2127. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01632-0. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
7
Narcissism, the Experience of Pain, and Risky Decision Making.自恋、疼痛体验与风险决策
Front Psychol. 2020 May 27;11:1128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01128. eCollection 2020.
8
Why to cooperate is better than to compete: brain and personality components.为何合作优于竞争:大脑与个性因素
BMC Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12868-017-0386-8.
9
Web addiction in the brain: Cortical oscillations, autonomic activity, and behavioral measures.大脑中的网络成瘾:皮层脑波活动、自主活动和行为测量。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):334-344. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.041. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10
Decisional impairments in cocaine addiction, reward bias, and cortical oscillation "unbalance".可卡因成瘾、奖励偏差和皮质振荡“失衡”中的决策障碍
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Mar 20;11:777-86. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S79696. eCollection 2015.