• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为何合作优于竞争:大脑与个性因素

Why to cooperate is better than to compete: brain and personality components.

作者信息

Balconi Michela, Crivelli Davide, Vanutelli Maria Elide

机构信息

Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.

Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12868-017-0386-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12868-017-0386-8
PMID:28931376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5607583/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cooperation and competition were compared in the present study. Brain correlates (electroencephalography, EEG frequency band, delta, theta, alpha, and beta) and hemodynamic measure of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS, O2Hb) were acquired during a joined cooperative (Experiment 1) or competitive (Experiment 2) task. Subjects were required to match each other's cognitive performance (cooperation) or to make better than others (competition) in terms of accuracy (error rate, ER) and response time (RT). In addition, a personality trait measure (behavioral activation system, BAS) was used to distinguish subjects based on their rewarding attitude. Self-perception of social ranking and real performance were considered in response to subjects' performance (that was artificially manipulated to show an increasing or decreasing profile during the task).

RESULTS

An increased left prefrontal cortical (PFC) responsiveness was found for subjects who had higher BAS rating in case of both cooperation and competition conditions. Moreover, subjects with higher BAS ratings showed greater frontal left activity during the cooperative task. These subjects also concomitantly perceived an increasing in social ranking and improved their performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Present results demonstrated that some trait components (BAS) and cooperative condition induce a positive self-representation in term of ranking and a best way to perform the task, as underlined by self-perception and cognitive outcomes. Indeed the higher BAS trait proved to be related with the representation of higher social ranking and with the perception of improved cognitive outcomes, with also a significant increased left PFC activity in cooperative contexts.

摘要

背景

本研究对合作与竞争进行了比较。在联合合作任务(实验1)或竞争任务(实验2)期间,获取了大脑相关性指标(脑电图、脑电频段、δ波、θ波、α波和β波)以及功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS,氧合血红蛋白,O2Hb)的血液动力学测量结果。要求受试者在准确性(错误率,ER)和反应时间(RT)方面相互匹配认知表现(合作)或比其他人表现更好(竞争)。此外,使用一种人格特质测量方法(行为激活系统,BAS)根据受试者的奖励态度对其进行区分。根据受试者的表现(在任务期间人为操纵以显示上升或下降趋势)考虑社会排名的自我认知和实际表现。

结果

在合作和竞争条件下,发现BAS评分较高的受试者左前额叶皮质(PFC)反应性增强。此外,BAS评分较高的受试者在合作任务期间额叶左侧活动更强。这些受试者同时也感觉到社会排名上升并提高了他们的表现。

结论

目前的结果表明,一些特质成分(BAS)和合作条件会在排名方面引发积极的自我表征以及执行任务的最佳方式,自我认知和认知结果也强调了这一点。事实上,较高的BAS特质被证明与更高的社会排名表征以及对改善的认知结果的感知相关,在合作情境中左前额叶皮质活动也显著增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/8cd3fa145a15/12868_2017_386_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/ae19b42864f7/12868_2017_386_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/bbbecc853609/12868_2017_386_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/68d6e46be1f1/12868_2017_386_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/2eeb19c479e8/12868_2017_386_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/b133c3c5d140/12868_2017_386_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/f3ed94aea118/12868_2017_386_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/27a5ec9d9d80/12868_2017_386_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/8cd3fa145a15/12868_2017_386_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/ae19b42864f7/12868_2017_386_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/bbbecc853609/12868_2017_386_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/68d6e46be1f1/12868_2017_386_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/2eeb19c479e8/12868_2017_386_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/b133c3c5d140/12868_2017_386_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/f3ed94aea118/12868_2017_386_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/27a5ec9d9d80/12868_2017_386_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fb/5607583/8cd3fa145a15/12868_2017_386_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Why to cooperate is better than to compete: brain and personality components.为何合作优于竞争:大脑与个性因素
BMC Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12868-017-0386-8.
2
Personality correlates (BAS-BIS), self-perception of social ranking, and cortical (alpha frequency band) modulation in peer-group comparison.人格相关性(行为激活系统-行为抑制系统)、社会等级自我认知以及同龄人比较中的皮质(阿尔法频段)调制
Physiol Behav. 2014 Jun 22;133:207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.043. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
3
Competition in the Brain. The Contribution of EEG and fNIRS Modulation and Personality Effects in Social Ranking.大脑中的竞争。脑电图(EEG)和功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)调制以及社会排名中人格效应的作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01587. eCollection 2016.
4
A semi-immersive virtual reality incremental swing balance task activates prefrontal cortex: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.半沉浸式虚拟现实递增摆荡平衡任务激活前额叶皮层:一项功能近红外光谱研究。
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 1:451-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.031. Epub 2013 May 17.
5
Interbrains cooperation: Hyperscanning and self-perception in joint actions.脑间合作:联合行动中的超扫描与自我感知
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Aug;39(6):607-620. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1253666. Epub 2016 Nov 13.
6
Resting state and personality component (BIS/BAS) predict the brain activity (EEG and fNIRS measure) in response to emotional cues.静息状态和人格成分(BIS/BAS)可以预测对情绪线索的大脑活动(EEG 和 fNIRS 测量)。
Brain Behav. 2017 Apr 5;7(5):e00686. doi: 10.1002/brb3.686. eCollection 2017 May.
7
Social hierarchies and emotions: cortical prefrontal activity, facial feedback (EMG), and cognitive performance in a dynamic interaction.社会等级制度与情绪:动态互动中的前额叶皮质活动、面部反馈(肌电图)及认知表现
Soc Neurosci. 2015 Apr;10(2):166-78. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.977403. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
8
What hemodynamic (fNIRS), electrophysiological (EEG) and autonomic integrated measures can tell us about emotional processing.血流动力学(功能性近红外光谱技术)、电生理(脑电图)及自主神经综合测量方法能就情绪加工过程告诉我们什么。
Brain Cogn. 2015 Apr;95:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
9
Deficit in rewarding mechanisms and prefrontal left/right cortical effect in vulnerability for internet addiction.奖励机制缺陷和前额叶左/右侧皮质对网络成瘾易感性的影响。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2016 Oct;28(5):272-85. doi: 10.1017/neu.2016.9. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
10
When cooperation goes wrong: brain and behavioural correlates of ineffective joint strategies in dyads.合作出现问题时:二元组中无效联合策略的大脑与行为关联
Int J Neurosci. 2018 Feb;128(2):155-166. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2017.1379519. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Social influence in persuasion and negotiation: a hyperscanning EEG and autonomic measures study.说服与谈判中的社会影响:一项超扫描脑电图和自主神经测量研究。
Front Neurosci. 2025 May 26;19:1604389. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1604389. eCollection 2025.
2
Cognitive and emotional engagement in negotiation: insights from EEG and fNIRS Hyperscanning.谈判中的认知与情感参与:来自脑电图(EEG)和功能近红外光谱超扫描(fNIRS Hyperscanning)的见解
Exp Brain Res. 2025 May 21;243(6):151. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07093-w.
3
Expressing appreciation is linked to interpersonal closeness and inter-brain coherence, both in person and over Zoom.

本文引用的文献

1
Brains in Competition: Improved Cognitive Performance and Inter-Brain Coupling by Hyperscanning Paradigm with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.相互竞争的大脑:通过功能近红外光谱超扫描范式提高认知表现和脑间耦合
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Aug 31;11:163. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00163. eCollection 2017.
2
Competition in the Brain. The Contribution of EEG and fNIRS Modulation and Personality Effects in Social Ranking.大脑中的竞争。脑电图(EEG)和功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)调制以及社会排名中人格效应的作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01587. eCollection 2016.
3
Deficit in rewarding mechanisms and prefrontal left/right cortical effect in vulnerability for internet addiction.
表达感激之情与人际亲近和大脑间的同步有关,无论是在现实中还是通过视频会议。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 May 24;33(11):7211-7220. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad032.
4
The Effects of Cooperative and Competitive Situations on Statistical Learning.合作与竞争情境对统计学习的影响。
Brain Sci. 2022 Aug 10;12(8):1059. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081059.
5
The Effect of Social Perspective-Taking on Interpersonal Trust Under the Cooperative and Competitive Contexts: The Mediating Role of Benevolence.合作与竞争情境下社会观点采择对人际信任的影响:善意的中介作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Jun 21;14:817-826. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S310557. eCollection 2021.
6
Inter-brain amplitude correlation differentiates cooperation from competition in a motion-sensing sports game.脑间振幅相关性可区分运动感知类游戏中的合作与竞争。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 May 21;16(6):552-564. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab031.
7
The effect of interbrain synchronization in gesture observation: A fNIRS study.脑间同步对视手势观察的影响:一项近红外光谱研究。
Brain Behav. 2020 Jul;10(7):e01663. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1663. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
Social frame and tax compliance modulate electrophysiological and autonomic responses following tax-related decisions.社会框架和纳税遵从度调节与纳税决策相关的电生理和自主反应。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 18;9(1):4713. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41156-7.
9
Functional EEG connectivity during competition.比赛期间的功能性脑电图连接性。
BMC Neurosci. 2018 Oct 18;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12868-018-0464-6.
10
Affective Synchrony and Autonomic Coupling during Cooperation: A Hyperscanning Study.合作过程中的情感同步和自主耦合:一项超扫描研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3104564. doi: 10.1155/2017/3104564. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
奖励机制缺陷和前额叶左/右侧皮质对网络成瘾易感性的影响。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2016 Oct;28(5):272-85. doi: 10.1017/neu.2016.9. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
4
Emotions and BIS/BAS components affect brain activity (ERPs and fNIRS) in observing intra-species and inter-species interactions.情绪和行为抑制系统/行为激活系统组件在观察种内和种间互动时会影响大脑活动(事件相关电位和功能性近红外光谱)。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Sep;10(3):750-60. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9443-z.
5
Vocal and visual stimulation, congruence and lateralization affect brain oscillations in interspecies emotional positive and negative interactions.声音和视觉刺激、一致性和偏侧化会影响跨物种情绪正负性互动中的脑振荡。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(3):297-310. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1081400. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
Role of the right inferior frontal gyrus in turn-based cooperation and competition: A near-infrared spectroscopy study.右侧额下回在轮流合作与竞争中的作用:一项近红外光谱研究。
Brain Cogn. 2015 Oct;99:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
What hemodynamic (fNIRS), electrophysiological (EEG) and autonomic integrated measures can tell us about emotional processing.血流动力学(功能性近红外光谱技术)、电生理(脑电图)及自主神经综合测量方法能就情绪加工过程告诉我们什么。
Brain Cogn. 2015 Apr;95:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
8
Decoding covert motivations of free riding and cooperation from multi-feature pattern analysis of EEG signals.从脑电图信号的多特征模式分析中解码搭便车和合作的隐蔽动机。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Sep;10(9):1210-8. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv006. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
9
Social hierarchies and emotions: cortical prefrontal activity, facial feedback (EMG), and cognitive performance in a dynamic interaction.社会等级制度与情绪:动态互动中的前额叶皮质活动、面部反馈(肌电图)及认知表现
Soc Neurosci. 2015 Apr;10(2):166-78. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.977403. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
10
Transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex increased pain empathy.经颅直流电刺激背外侧前额叶皮层可增强疼痛共情。
Neuroscience. 2014 Dec 5;281:202-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.09.044. Epub 2014 Oct 5.