Suppr超能文献

醋酸艾司利卡西平治疗局灶性癫痫患者的长期安全性和疗效:1年ESLIBASE回顾性研究结果

Long-term safety and efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate in patients with focal seizures: results of the 1-year ESLIBASE retrospective study.

作者信息

Villanueva V, Serratosa J M, Guillamón E, Garcés M, Giráldez B G, Toledo M, Salas-Puig J, López González F J, Flores J, Rodríguez-Uranga J, Castillo A, Mauri J A, Camacho J L, López-Gomáriz E, Giner P, Torres N, Palau J, Molins A

机构信息

Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2014 Sep;108(7):1243-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 May 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) licensed as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset or focal seizures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in a clinical practice setting the long-term efficacy and safety of ESL in patients with focal seizures.

METHODS

ESLIBASE was a retrospective study that included all patients with focal seizures who started ESL between January 2010 and July 2012 at 12 hospitals. ESL was prescribed individually according to real-life practice. Efficacy and safety were evaluated over 1 year. Switching from carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) was assessed.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty-seven patients were included; 78% of patients were taking ≥2 other AEDs at baseline. Most (87%) began ESL because of poor seizure control and 13% because of adverse events (AEs) with CBZ or OXC. After 1 year, 237 patients (72.4%) remained on ESL. At 3, 6 and 12 months, the responder rate was 46.3%, 57.9%, and 52.5%, and 21.0%, 28.0%, and 25.3% of patients were seizure free. The responder rate significantly increased when ESL was combined with a non-sodium channel-targeting drug (non-SC drug) (66.7%) versus an SC drug (47.7%; p<0.001). At 12 months, 40.7% of patients had ≥1 AE; AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 16.2%. Dizziness, nausea, and somnolence were the most common AEs. The tolerability profile improved in >50% of the patients who switched from CBZ or OXC to ESL because of AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

ESL was well tolerated and effective in a real-world setting over 1 year. Side-effect profile improved when OXC and CBZ recipients were switched to ESL.

摘要

背景

醋酸艾司利卡西平(ESL)是一种新型抗癫痫药物(AED),被批准作为辅助治疗药物用于治疗成人部分性发作或局灶性癫痫。

目的

在临床实践环境中评估ESL治疗局灶性癫痫患者的长期疗效和安全性。

方法

ESLIBASE是一项回顾性研究,纳入了2010年1月至2012年7月期间在12家医院开始使用ESL的所有局灶性癫痫患者。ESL根据实际临床实践进行个体化给药。对疗效和安全性进行了为期1年的评估。评估了从卡马西平(CBZ)和奥卡西平(OXC)转换用药的情况。

结果

共纳入327例患者;78%的患者在基线时正在服用≥2种其他AED。大多数患者(87%)开始使用ESL是因为癫痫控制不佳,13%是因为CBZ或OXC的不良事件(AE)。1年后,237例患者(72.4%)仍在使用ESL。在3个月、6个月和12个月时,有效率分别为46.3%、57.9%和52.5%,无癫痫发作的患者分别为21.0%、28.0%和25.3%。当ESL与非钠通道靶向药物(非SC药物)联合使用时,有效率显著提高(66.7%),而与SC药物联合使用时有效率为47.7%(p<0.001)。在12个月时,40.7%的患者发生≥1次AE;AE导致16.2%的患者停药。头晕、恶心和嗜睡是最常见的AE。因AE从CBZ或OXC转换为ESL的患者中,超过50%的患者耐受性有所改善。

结论

在现实环境中ESL在1年的时间里耐受性良好且有效。从OXC和CBZ转换为ESL治疗的患者副作用情况有所改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验