Lee Barrett A, Tyler Kimberly A, Wright James D
Department of Sociology The Pennsylvania State University 517 Oswald Tower University Park, PA 16802-6207
Department of Sociology University of Nebraska Lincoln, NE 68588-0324
Annu Rev Sociol. 2010 Aug 1;36:501-521. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115940.
The 'new homelessness' has drawn sustained attention from scholars over the past three decades. Definitional inconsistencies and data limitations rendered early work during this period largely speculative in nature. Thanks to conceptual, theoretical, and methodological progress, however, the research literature now provides a fuller understanding of homelessness. Contributions by sociologists and other social scientists since the mid-1990s differentiate among types of homelessness, provide credible demographic estimates, and show how being homeless affects a person's life chances and coping strategies. Agreement also exists about the main macro- and micro-level causes of homelessness. Active lines of inquiry examine public, media, and governmental responses to the problem as well as homeless people's efforts to mobilize on their own behalf. Despite the obstacles faced when studying a stigmatized population marked by high turnover and weak anchors to place, recent investigations have significantly influenced homelessness policy. A greater emphasis on prevention should further strengthen the research-policy nexus.
在过去三十年里,“新 homelessness”一直受到学者们的持续关注。定义上的不一致和数据限制使得这一时期早期的研究工作在很大程度上具有推测性。然而,由于概念、理论和方法上的进步,现在的研究文献对 homelessness 有了更全面的理解。自20世纪90年代中期以来,社会学家和其他社会科学家的贡献区分了 homelessness 的类型,提供了可信的人口统计估计,并展示了无家可归如何影响一个人的生活机会和应对策略。对于 homelessness 的主要宏观和微观层面原因也存在共识。活跃的研究方向考察了公众、媒体和政府对该问题的反应以及无家可归者为自身利益进行动员的努力。尽管在研究一个流动率高且与地点联系薄弱的受污名化群体时面临诸多障碍,但最近的调查对 homelessness 政策产生了重大影响。对预防的更多重视应进一步加强研究与政策的联系。