Moeintaghavi Amir, Pourjavad Monireh, Dadgar Sepideh, Tabbakh Najmeh Shayesteh
Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Gynecology, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
J Dent (Tehran). 2013 Sep;10(5):443-8. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
Different studies have reported contradictory results about the effect of osteoporosis on periodontal status. We performed this study to evaluate the periodontal status of menopausal women by methods with enough accuracy and confidence.
This study was performed based on the evaluation of bone mineral density using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 2010. A total of 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected and divided into three groups of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal. Then, evaluation of periodontal markers such as pocket depth (DP), attachment loss (AL), and tooth loss (TL) was performed by a dental student. A panoramic radiography was performed for those who were suspicious of periodontal disease and bone decline. Finally, evaluation of the periodontal indexes was compared among the three groups using ANOVA with 95% confidence interval.
Mean bone decline was higher in the osteoporosis group compared to the other two groups, but the difference was not significant (P=0.065). In addition, mean of plaque index (P=0.123), pocket depth (P=0.856), attachment loss (p=0.525), and tooth loss (p=0.884), the number of people with attachment loss ≥ 2millimeter (P=0.866) and the number of people with alveolar bone loss ≥ 2 millimeter (P=0.348) were not significantly different between the three groups.
In this study, no significant difference was observed between the three groups in terms of plaque index, pocket depth, attachment loss, or tooth loss. However, further studies are required that could control all the possible confounding variables.
不同研究报告了关于骨质疏松症对牙周状况影响的相互矛盾的结果。我们开展本研究,以足够准确和可靠的方法评估绝经后女性的牙周状况。
本研究基于2010年使用双能X线吸收法对骨密度的评估进行。共选取60例符合纳入标准的患者,分为骨质疏松组、骨量减少组和正常组三组。然后,由一名牙科专业学生对牙周指标如牙周袋深度(DP)、附着丧失(AL)和牙齿缺失(TL)进行评估。对怀疑有牙周疾病和骨质流失的患者进行全景X线摄影。最后,使用95%置信区间的方差分析比较三组之间的牙周指数评估结果。
与其他两组相比,骨质疏松组的平均骨质流失更高,但差异不显著(P = 0.065)。此外,三组之间的菌斑指数均值(P = 0.123)、牙周袋深度(P = 0.856)、附着丧失(P = 0.525)、牙齿缺失(P = 0.884)、附着丧失≥2毫米的人数(P = 0.866)以及牙槽骨丧失≥2毫米的人数(P = 0.348)均无显著差异。
在本研究中,三组在菌斑指数、牙周袋深度、附着丧失或牙齿缺失方面未观察到显著差异。然而,需要进一步的研究来控制所有可能的混杂变量。