Suppr超能文献

正畸非乳胶弹力圈力衰减的体外比较

An In-vitro Comparison of Force Loss of Orthodontic Non-Latex Elastics.

作者信息

Alavi Shiva, Tabatabaie Atusa Rahnama, Hajizadeh Fatemeh, Ardekani Alireza Haerian

机构信息

Associate Professor, Torabinejad Dental Research Center, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Private Practice of Orthodontics, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Jan;11(1):10-6. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The amount and consistency of the applied forces to the tooth are important factors in tooth movements; therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the initial force and the force loss of three brands of elastics in 24 hours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this in-vitro study sixty non-latex elastics (3/16 medium) from three companies (Forestadent, Dentaurum and Ortho Technology) were randomly selected. Two static tests were performed, the first in a dry environment to evaluate the initial force and the other performed in a wet environment (artificial saliva) to evaluate the force loss in 24 hours. The Universal testing machine measured the forces after stretching the elastics to three times the lumen diameter. Data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA, One-way ANOVA, Tukey-HSD, Paired samples test, and one sample test.

RESULTS

The difference between the brands was significant (p=0.002). Force loss was observed in all samples; 4-7.5% force loss occurred after one hour and 19-38% force loss occurred after 24 hours. The average initial force of Forestadent and Ortho Technology was significantly higher than marketed forces (p<0.001), but the initial force of Dentaurum elastics was similar to the marketed force.

CONCLUSION

The force loss over 24 hours time period was Forestadent>Dentaurum>Ortho-Technology. According to the initial force and force loss percentage it is suggested to replace the non-latex elastics several times a day.

摘要

目的

施加于牙齿的力的大小和持续性是牙齿移动的重要因素;因此,本研究的目的是比较三种品牌的弹力线在24小时内的初始力和力的损失情况。

材料与方法

在这项体外研究中,随机选取了来自三家公司(Forestadent、Dentaurum和Ortho Technology)的60根非乳胶弹力线(3/16中等规格)。进行了两项静态测试,第一项在干燥环境中进行以评估初始力,另一项在潮湿环境(人工唾液)中进行以评估24小时内的力损失。万能试验机在将弹力线拉伸至管腔直径的三倍后测量力。数据通过重复测量方差分析、单因素方差分析、Tukey-HSD检验、配对样本检验和单样本检验进行分析。

结果

品牌之间的差异具有显著性(p = 0.002)。在所有样本中均观察到力的损失;1小时后力损失4 - 7.5%,24小时后力损失19 - 38%。Forestadent和Ortho Technology的平均初始力显著高于市场宣传的力(p < 0.001),但Dentaurum弹力线的初始力与市场宣传的力相似。

结论

24小时内的力损失情况为Forestadent>Dentaurum>Ortho-Technology。根据初始力和力损失百分比,建议每天多次更换非乳胶弹力线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/162a/4037257/88364de26e76/jod-11-10f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验