Jacobs Cassandra L, Dell Gary S
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2014;29(4):512-523. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.892144.
Do we say when we say ? In five experiments using the implicit priming paradigm, we assessed whether nominal compounds composed of two free morphemes like or are prepared for production at the segmental level in the same way that two-syllable monomorphemic words (e.g. ) are, or instead as sequences of separable words (e.g. or ). The experiments demonstrated that nominal compounds are planned as a single sequence, not as two sequences. Specifically, the onset of the second component of the compound (e.g. /d/ in ) did not act as a primeable starting point, although comparable onsets did when that component was an independent word (). We conclude that there may be a in at the morpheme level, but not when phonological segments are prepared for production.
当我们说出“ ”时，我们究竟在说什么？在五项使用内隐启动范式的实验中，我们评估了由两个自由语素组成的复合词（如“ ”或“ ”）在音段层面上是否像双音节单语素词（如“ ”）那样被准备用于产出，还是作为可分离词的序列（如“ ”或“ ”）来准备。实验表明，复合词是作为单个序列来规划的，而不是两个序列。具体而言，复合词第二个成分的起始音（如“ ”中的 /d/）并没有起到可启动的起始点的作用，尽管当该成分是一个独立单词（“ ”）时，类似的起始音会起到这样的作用。我们得出结论，在语素层面上可能存在“ ”，但在为产出准备音段时则不存在。
