The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China.
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048776. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
Evidence from previous psycholinguistic research suggests that phonological units such as phonemes have a privileged role during phonological planning in Dutch and English (aka the segment-retrieval hypothesis). However, the syllable-retrieval hypothesis previously proposed for Mandarin assumes that only the entire syllable unit (without the tone) can be prepared in advance in speech planning. Using Cantonese Chinese as a test case, the present study was conducted to investigate whether the syllable-retrieval hypothesis can be applied to other Chinese spoken languages. In four implicit priming (form-preparation) experiments, participants were asked to learn various sets of prompt-response di-syllabic word pairs and to utter the corresponding response word upon seeing each prompt. The response words in a block were either phonologically related (homogeneous) or unrelated (heterogeneous). Participants' naming responses were significantly faster in the homogeneous than in the heterogeneous conditions when the response words shared the same word-initial syllable (without the tone) (Exps.1 and 4) or body (Exps.3 and 4), but not when they shared merely the same word-initial phoneme (Exp.2). Furthermore, the priming effect observed in the syllable-related condition was significantly larger than that in the body-related condition (Exp. 4). Although the observed syllable priming effects and the null effect of word-initial phoneme are consistent with the syllable-retrieval hypothesis, the body-related (sub-syllabic) priming effects obtained in this Cantonese study are not. These results suggest that the syllable-retrieval hypothesis is not generalizable to all Chinese spoken languages and that both syllable and sub-syllabic constituents are legitimate planning units in Cantonese speech production.
先前的心理语言学研究表明,在荷兰语和英语中,音位等语音单位在语音规划中具有特殊作用(即分段检索假设)。然而,之前为普通话提出的音节检索假设则假定,只有整个音节单元(不包括声调)可以提前在语音规划中准备。本研究以粤语为例,旨在探讨音节检索假设是否适用于其他汉语口语。在四项内隐启动(形式准备)实验中,要求参与者学习各种双音节词对,并在看到每个提示时说出相应的反应词。在一个块中,反应词要么是语音相关的(同构),要么是不相关的(异构)。当反应词共享相同的词首音节(无声调)(实验 1 和 4)或词身(实验 3 和 4)时,同构条件下参与者的命名反应明显快于异构条件下的反应,但当它们仅共享相同的词首音素时则不然(实验 2)。此外,在音节相关条件下观察到的启动效应明显大于在词身相关条件下的启动效应(实验 4)。尽管观察到的音节启动效应和词首音素的零效应与音节检索假设一致,但在这项粤语研究中观察到的词身相关(亚音节)启动效应则不一致。这些结果表明,音节检索假设不适用于所有汉语口语,并且在粤语语音产生中,音节和亚音节成分都是合法的规划单元。