Nijboer Menno, Borst Jelmer, van Rijn Hedderik, Taatgen Niels
Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; Dept. of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, United States.
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:60-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.082. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
There is no consensus regarding the origin of behavioral interference that occurs during concurrent multitasking. Some evidence points toward a multitasking locus in the brain, while other results imply that interference is the consequence of task interactions in several brain regions. To investigate this issue, we conducted a functional MRI (fMRI) study consisting of three component tasks, which were performed both separately and in combination. The results indicated that no specific multitasking area exists. Instead, different patterns of activation across conditions could be explained by assuming that the interference is a result of task interactions. Additionally, similarity in single-task activation patterns correlated with a decrease in accuracy during dual-task conditions. Taken together, these results support the view that multitasking interference is not due to a bottleneck in a single "multitasking" brain region, but is a result of interactions between concurrently running processes.
关于同时进行多任务时出现的行为干扰的起源,目前尚无共识。一些证据指向大脑中的一个多任务处理位点,而其他结果则暗示干扰是几个脑区任务交互的结果。为了研究这个问题,我们进行了一项功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)研究,该研究由三个组成任务组成,这些任务既分别执行,也组合执行。结果表明不存在特定的多任务处理区域。相反,通过假设干扰是任务交互的结果,可以解释不同条件下的不同激活模式。此外,单任务激活模式的相似性与双任务条件下准确性的降低相关。综上所述,这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即多任务干扰不是由于单个“多任务”脑区的瓶颈,而是同时运行的进程之间相互作用的结果。