Zhong Victor W, Pfaff Emily R, Beavers Daniel P, Thomas Joan, Jaacks Lindsay M, Bowlby Deborah A, Carey Timothy S, Lawrence Jean M, Dabelea Dana, Hamman Richard F, Pihoker Catherine, Saydah Sharon H, Mayer-Davis Elizabeth J
Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Dec;15(8):573-84. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12152. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
The performance of automated algorithms for childhood diabetes case ascertainment and type classification may differ by demographic characteristics.
This study evaluated the potential of administrative and electronic health record (EHR) data from a large academic care delivery system to conduct diabetes case ascertainment in youth according to type, age, and race/ethnicity.
Of 57 767 children aged <20 yr as of 31 December 2011 seen at University of North Carolina Health Care System in 2011 were included.
Using an initial algorithm including billing data, patient problem lists, laboratory test results, and diabetes related medications between 1 July 2008 and 31 December 2011, presumptive cases were identified and validated by chart review. More refined algorithms were evaluated by type (type 1 vs. type 2), age (<10 vs. ≥10 yr) and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White vs. 'other'). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated and compared.
The best algorithm for ascertainment of overall diabetes cases was billing data. The best type 1 algorithm was the ratio of the number of type 1 billing codes to the sum of type 1 and type 2 billing codes ≥0.5. A useful algorithm to ascertain youth with type 2 diabetes with 'other' race/ethnicity was identified. Considerable age and racial/ethnic differences were present in type-non-specific and type 2 algorithms.
Administrative and EHR data may be used to identify cases of childhood diabetes (any type), and to identify type 1 cases. The performance of type 2 case ascertainment algorithms differed substantially by race/ethnicity.
用于儿童糖尿病病例确诊和类型分类的自动化算法的性能可能因人口统计学特征而异。
本研究评估了来自大型学术医疗服务系统的管理和电子健康记录(EHR)数据,以根据类型、年龄和种族/民族对青少年糖尿病病例进行确诊的潜力。
纳入了截至2011年12月31日在北卡罗来纳大学医疗系统就诊的57767名20岁以下儿童。
使用一种初始算法,该算法包括2008年7月1日至2011年12月31日期间的计费数据、患者问题列表、实验室检查结果和糖尿病相关药物,通过病历审查确定并验证疑似病例。通过类型(1型与2型)、年龄(<10岁与≥10岁)和种族/民族(非西班牙裔白人与“其他”)评估更精细的算法。计算并比较敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值。
确诊总体糖尿病病例的最佳算法是计费数据。最佳的1型算法是1型计费代码数量与1型和2型计费代码总和之比≥0.5。确定了一种用于确诊“其他”种族/民族的2型糖尿病青少年的有用算法。在非特定类型和2型算法中存在显著的年龄和种族/民族差异。
管理和EHR数据可用于识别儿童糖尿病(任何类型)病例,并识别1型病例。2型病例确诊算法的性能因种族/民族而异。