Park Wan, Kim Bun, Park Soo Jung, Cheon Jae Hee, Kim Tae Il, Kim Won Ho, Hong Sung Pil
Wan Park, Bun Kim, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Sung Pil Hong, Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 7;20(21):6586-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6586.
To evaluate the depth of invasion of small, early colorectal cancers (ECCs) using conventional endoscopic features.
From January 2005 to September 2011, colonoscopy cohort showed that a total of 72 patients with small colorectal cancers with the size less than 20 mm underwent colonoscopy at the Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Among them, 8 patients were excluded due to incomplete medical records. Finally, a total of 64 ECCs with submucosa (SM) invasion and size less than 20 mm were included. One hundred fifty-two adenomas with size less than 20 mm were included as controls. Nine endoscopic features, including seven morphological findings (i.e., loss of lobulation, excavation, demarcated and depressed areas, stalk swelling, fullness, fold convergence, and bleeding ulcers), pit patterns, and non-lifting signs, were evaluated retrospectively. All endoscopic features were evaluated by two experienced endoscopists who have each performed over 1000 colonoscopies annually for more than five years without knowledge of the histology.
Among the morphological findings, the size of deep submucosal cancers was bigger than that of superficial lesions (16.9 mm vs 12.3 mm, P < 0.001). Also, demarcated depressed areas, stalk swelling, and fullness were more common in deep SM cancers than in superficial tumors (demarcated depressed areas: 52.0% vs 15.7%, P < 0.001; stalk swelling: 100% vs 4.2%, P < 0.001; fullness: 25.0% vs 0%, P = 0.001). Among deep SM cancers, 96% of polyps showed invasive pit patterns, whereas 19.4% of superficial tumors showed invasive pit patterns (P < 0.001). A positive non-lifting sign was more common in deep SM cancers (85.0% vs 28.6%, P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of invasive morphology, invasive pit patterns, and non-lifting signs for deep SM cancers were 71%, 82%, and 75%, respectively.
Conventional endoscopic findings were insufficient to discriminate small, deep SM cancers from superficial SM cancers by white light, standard colonoscopy.
利用传统内镜特征评估早期小的结直肠癌(ECC)的浸润深度。
2005年1月至2011年9月,结肠镜检查队列显示,韩国首尔延世大学医学院共有72例大小小于20mm的小的结直肠癌患者接受了结肠镜检查。其中,8例因病历不完整被排除。最终,共纳入64例有黏膜下层(SM)浸润且大小小于20mm的ECC。纳入152例大小小于20mm的腺瘤作为对照。回顾性评估9项内镜特征,包括7种形态学表现(即分叶消失、溃疡形成、边界清晰的凹陷区、蒂部肿胀、饱满、皱襞融合和出血性溃疡)、腺管开口形态和非抬举征。所有内镜特征均由两名经验丰富的内镜医师评估,他们每人每年进行超过1000例结肠镜检查,持续五年以上,且不知晓组织学结果。
在形态学表现中,深层黏膜下癌的大小大于浅层病变(16.9mm对12.3mm,P<0.001)。此外,边界清晰的凹陷区、蒂部肿胀和饱满在深层SM癌中比在浅层肿瘤中更常见(边界清晰的凹陷区:52.0%对15.7%,P<0.001;蒂部肿胀:100%对4.2%,P<0.001;饱满:25.0%对0%,P=0.001)。在深层SM癌中,96%的息肉显示浸润性腺管开口形态,而在浅层肿瘤中19.4%显示浸润性腺管开口形态(P<0.001)。阳性非抬举征在深层SM癌中更常见(85.0%对28.6%,P<0.001)。浸润性形态、浸润性腺管开口形态和非抬举征对深层SM癌的诊断准确率分别为71%、82%和75%。
通过白光标准结肠镜检查,传统内镜表现不足以区分小的深层SM癌和浅层SM癌。