Suppr超能文献

用于治疗呼吸困难的雾化药物:文献综述

Nebulized medications for the treatment of dyspnea: a literature review.

作者信息

Boyden Jackelyn Y, Connor Stephen R, Otolorin Lily, Nathan Steven D, Fine Perry G, Davis Malene S, Muir J Cameron

机构信息

1 Capital Caring , Falls Church, VA 22042.

出版信息

J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015 Feb;28(1):1-19. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2014.1136. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dyspnea significantly impacts quality of life and is one of the most common symptoms in advanced illness. Systemically-administered opioids and benzodiazepines have been the most studied and utilized pharmacologic treatments for refractory dyspnea. Less attention has been given to the use of these medications and others when nebulized. This article presents a review of the literature on the use of nebulized medications for the treatment of dyspnea related to cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, or experimentally-induced dyspnea.

METHODS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted using Medline/PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine publications were included in this review, including 17 high-quality clinical research studies, as defined by the GRADE system. The evidence for nebulized morphine remains mixed, whereas a potential benefit was suggested for nebulized furosemide, hydromorphone, and fentanyl. No conclusions could be drawn as to which disease population derived greatest benefit from nebulized medications, or whether jet or ultrasonic nebulizers were more effective for the delivery of these medications.

CONCLUSIONS

More research is needed to assess the characteristics of specific diseases and the combination of different nebulizers and medications that may yield the greatest benefit, and to assess the safety and efficacy of the chronic use of nebulized opioids and furosemide. Until larger, longer-term studies are completed, the use of nebulized medications to treat dyspnea should be assessed on a case-by-case basis and may be considered if the hoped-for benefits outweigh potential harm.

摘要

背景

呼吸困难严重影响生活质量,是晚期疾病最常见的症状之一。全身应用阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物是针对难治性呼吸困难研究和应用最多的药物治疗方法。对于这些药物及其他药物雾化吸入的应用,关注较少。本文综述了雾化药物用于治疗与癌症、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、囊性纤维化、间质性肺疾病相关的呼吸困难或实验性诱发的呼吸困难的文献。

方法

使用Medline/PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane和谷歌学术对同行评议的文献进行系统综述。

结果

本综述纳入了39篇出版物,包括17项根据GRADE系统定义的高质量临床研究。雾化吗啡的证据仍然不一,而雾化呋塞米、氢吗啡酮和芬太尼显示出潜在益处。对于哪些疾病人群从雾化药物中获益最大,或者喷射式雾化器或超声雾化器在输送这些药物方面是否更有效,尚无定论。

结论

需要更多研究来评估特定疾病的特征以及不同雾化器和药物的组合可能产生的最大益处,并评估长期使用雾化阿片类药物和呋塞米的安全性和有效性。在完成更大规模、更长期的研究之前,使用雾化药物治疗呼吸困难应逐案评估,只有当预期益处超过潜在危害时才可以考虑使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验