Mortenson W Ben, Miller William C, Polgar Jan Miller
Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Oct;95(10):1918-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
To examine the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Late Life Disability Instrument (LLDI) in individuals who use power wheelchairs as their primary means of mobility.
A 4-week, test-retest study design.
Five Canadian cities.
The validity sample included 115 new and experienced power mobility users, and the reliability sample included 85 experienced users (N=115). These volunteer samples included individuals who were aged ≥50 years and independently used power mobility as their primary means of mobility.
Not applicable.
The LLDI measures participation in 2 dimensions of 16 life activities: frequency and perceived limitations. Validity measures included the Wheelchair Skills Test-power version, the Assistive Technology Outcomes Profile for Mobility, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Power Mobility Wheelchair Confidence Measure, and the Life Space Assessment.
For the reliability sample, raw intraclass correlational coefficients for limitation and frequency dimension scores ranged from .855 (95% confidence interval .781-.905) to .883 (95% confidence interval, .822-.924), respectively. For the validity sample, scores on the LLDI were correlated as hypothesized with scores on validity measures. The factor structure that was identified with the original sample was not replicated among power wheelchair users. For LLDI frequency, exploratory factor analysis indicated that 5 of the original 16 items did not perform similarly among power wheelchair users. For LLDI limitations, a 1-factor, rather than a 2-factor, solution was identified.
The study provides evidence in support of the reliability and validity of the measure but suggests that the original subscale scores may not be applicable to power wheelchair users.
研究晚期生活残疾量表(LLDI)在以电动轮椅为主要移动方式的个体中的信度、效度及因子结构。
为期4周的重测研究设计。
加拿大的五个城市。
效度样本包括115名新的和有经验的电动移动设备使用者,信度样本包括85名有经验的使用者(N = 115)。这些志愿者样本包括年龄≥50岁且独立使用电动移动设备作为主要移动方式的个体。
不适用。
LLDI测量参与16项生活活动的两个维度:频率和感知到的限制。效度测量包括轮椅技能测试-电动版、移动辅助技术结果概况、医院焦虑抑郁量表、电动移动轮椅信心测量和生活空间评估。
对于信度样本,限制维度和频率维度得分的原始组内相关系数分别为0.855(95%置信区间0.781 - 0.905)至0.883(95%置信区间0.822 - 0.924)。对于效度样本,LLDI得分与效度测量得分的相关性符合假设。在电动轮椅使用者中未重复在原始样本中确定的因子结构。对于LLDI频率,探索性因子分析表明,16项原始条目中有5项在电动轮椅使用者中的表现不同。对于LLDI限制,确定的是单因素而非双因素解决方案。
该研究为该测量方法的信度和效度提供了支持证据,但表明原始子量表得分可能不适用于电动轮椅使用者。