• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

龋病评估与治疗(CAST)工具

The Caries Assessment and Treatment (CAST) instrument.

作者信息

Frencken Jo E, de Souza Ana Luiza, van der Sanden Wil J M, Bronkhorst Ewald M, Leal Soraya Coelho

机构信息

Department of Global Oral Health, College of Dental Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;41(1):e71-7. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12027.

DOI:10.1111/cdoe.12027
PMID:24916680
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the 'Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment' (CAST) instrument, its origin and content, and to provide an example of how results can be reported.

METHODS

The CAST instrument covers the complete range of stages of carious lesion progression: from no carious lesion, through caries protection (sealant) and lesion care (restoration) to lesions in enamel and dentine, the advanced stages of carious lesion progression in pulpal and its consequences on tooth-surrounding tissue and tooth loss due to caries. Using the RAND modified e-Delphi consensus method two independent panels, comprising a total of 56 epidemiologists from 27 countries, determined the face and content validity of CAST. Panellists assessed 17 statements related to the content, description, suitability and international use of CAST. Agreement of 75% or higher was required for reaching consensus on a statement. Construct validity and reliability testing of CAST have been carried out, but results are not yet available.

RESULTS

All 17 statements were approved by the panellists, who found the RAND modified e-Delphi consensus method suitable for achieving consensus. The CAST codes were ordered hierarchically. External validity was obtained. Reporting using CAST can be performed for orally healthy dentitions and those having morbidity and mortality. A DMF score can easily be calculated from the CAST codes, thereby enabling retention of the use of existing DMF scores.

CONCLUSION

The CAST instrument for use in epidemiological surveys is very promising. Face and content validation is obtained. Construct validity and reliability testing will be completed soon. A structure for reporting results in a comprehensive, pragmatic and easily understood way is being developed.

摘要

目的

描述“龋病评估谱与治疗”(CAST)工具、其起源和内容,并提供结果报告示例。

方法

CAST工具涵盖龋病病变进展的各个阶段:从无龋病病变,经过龋病预防(窝沟封闭)和病变护理(修复),到釉质和牙本质病变、龋病病变进展的晚期阶段、牙髓病变及其对牙齿周围组织的影响以及因龋病导致的牙齿缺失。使用兰德改良的电子德尔菲共识方法,由来自27个国家的总共56名流行病学家组成的两个独立小组确定了CAST的表面效度和内容效度。小组成员评估了与CAST的内容、描述、适用性和国际使用相关的17项陈述。就一项陈述达成共识需要75%或更高的一致性。已经对CAST进行了结构效度和信度测试,但结果尚未可得。

结果

所有17项陈述均得到小组成员的认可,他们发现兰德改良的电子德尔菲共识方法适合达成共识。CAST编码按层次顺序排列。获得了外部效度。可以使用CAST对口腔健康的牙列以及有发病和死亡情况的牙列进行报告。可以根据CAST编码轻松计算DMF分数,从而能够保留现有DMF分数的使用。

结论

用于流行病学调查的CAST工具很有前景。获得了表面效度和内容效度。结构效度和信度测试将很快完成。正在开发一种以全面、实用且易于理解的方式报告结果的结构。

相似文献

1
The Caries Assessment and Treatment (CAST) instrument.龋病评估与治疗(CAST)工具
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;41(1):e71-7. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12027.
2
The Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) index: face and content validation.龋病评估谱和治疗 (CAST) 指数:表面和内容验证。
Int Dent J. 2012 Oct;62(5):270-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2012.00121.x.
3
The Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) index: rational and development.龋病评估谱和治疗(CAST)指数:原理和发展。
Int Dent J. 2011 Jun;61(3):117-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00022.x.
4
The caries assessment spectrum and treatment (CAST) instrument: its reproducibility in clinical studies.龋病评估谱和治疗(CAST)工具:其在临床研究中的可重复性。
Int Dent J. 2014 Aug;64(4):187-94. doi: 10.1111/idj.12104. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
5
Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST): A Novel Epidemiological Instrument.龋病评估谱和治疗(CAST):一种新型的流行病学工具。
Caries Res. 2017;51(5):500-506. doi: 10.1159/000479042. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
The Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) instrument: construct validation.龋病评估谱与治疗(CAST)工具:结构效度验证
Eur J Oral Sci. 2014 Apr;122(2):149-53. doi: 10.1111/eos.12116. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
7
Caries assessment spectrum treatment: the severity score.龋病评估谱治疗:严重程度评分。
Int Dent J. 2018 Apr;68(2):84-90. doi: 10.1111/idj.12331. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
An assessment of three contemporary dental caries epidemiological instruments: a critical review.三种当代龋病流行病学工具评估:批判性综述。
Br Dent J. 2020 Jan;228(1):25-31. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-1081-1.
9
Assessment of caries experience in epidemiological surveys: a review.流行病学调查中龋病经验的评估:综述
Community Dent Health. 2012 Mar;29(1):14-9.
10
Variations in caries diagnoses and treatment recommendations and their impacts on the costs of oral health care.龋齿诊断与治疗建议的差异及其对口腔保健成本的影响。
Community Dent Health. 2012 Mar;29(1):25-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial on oral health promotion programs for adolescents in Iran.伊朗青少年口腔健康促进项目整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21380. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06147-x.
2
The effect of the modified basic package of oral care on adolescent dental caries status in Zambia; a cluster randomized trial.改良口腔护理基本套餐对赞比亚青少年龋齿状况的影响;一项整群随机试验。
Front Oral Health. 2025 May 7;6:1542337. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1542337. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparative evaluation of dental caries experience using CAST index and WHO criteria among 5 and 15-year-old schoolchildren.
使用CAST指数和世界卫生组织标准对5至15岁学童的龋齿经历进行比较评估。
Med Pharm Rep. 2023 Apr;96(2):192-198. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2459. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
4
Planning and Reporting Effective Web-Based RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Panels: Literature Review and Preliminary Recommendations.规划和报告有效的基于网络的 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法小组:文献回顾和初步建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 26;24(8):e33898. doi: 10.2196/33898.
5
Assessment of caries diagnostic thresholds of DMFT, ICDAS II and CAST in the estimation of caries prevalence rate in first permanent molars in early permanent dentition-a cross-sectional study.在早期恒牙中,使用 DMFT、ICDAS II 和 CAST 评估龋齿诊断阈值对第一恒磨牙龋齿患病率的估计——一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 20;22(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02134-0.
6
Application of caries assessment spectrum and treatment instrument for staging and evaluating treatment needs of an adult population - A hospital based cross-sectional study.龋病评估谱和治疗器械在评估成人人群治疗需求中的应用——一项基于医院的横断面研究。
Afr Health Sci. 2021 Dec;21(4):1898-1904. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i4.48.
7
SOS teeth with advanced caries and sociodemographic indicators, health-related habits and dental attendance patterns: data from the Dental, Oral, Medical Epidemiological (DOME) nationwide records-based study.SOS 牙伴发龋病及社会人口学指标、口腔健康相关习惯和口腔就诊模式:基于全国口腔、口腔健康流行病学(DOME)记录的全国性研究数据。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Aug 9;21(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01751-5.
8
Identifying and Avoiding Risk of Bias in Caries Diagnostic Studies.识别并避免龋齿诊断研究中的偏倚风险。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 22;10(15):3223. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153223.
9
Is there an association between dental caries, fluorosis, and molar-incisor hypomineralization?龋齿、氟斑牙和磨牙-切牙矿化不全之间是否存在关联?
J Appl Oral Sci. 2021 Jul 16;29:e20200890. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0890. eCollection 2021.
10
Caries incidence of the first permanent molars according to the Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) index and its determinants in children: a cohort study.根据龋病评估谱和治疗(CAST)指数评估儿童第一恒磨牙龋病的发病情况及其决定因素:一项队列研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 13;21(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01612-1.