• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别并避免龋齿诊断研究中的偏倚风险。

Identifying and Avoiding Risk of Bias in Caries Diagnostic Studies.

作者信息

Kühnisch Jan, Janjic Rankovic Mila, Kapor Svetlana, Schüler Ina, Krause Felix, Michou Stavroula, Ekstrand Kim, Eggmann Florin, Neuhaus Klaus W, Lussi Adrian, Huysmans Marie-Charlotte

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 22;10(15):3223. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153223.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10153223
PMID:34362007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8347423/
Abstract

Caries diagnostic studies differ with respect to their design, included patients/tooth samples, use of diagnostic and reference methods, calibration, blinding and data reporting. Such heterogeneity makes comparisons between studies difficult and could represent a substantial risk of bias (RoB) when it is not identified. Therefore, the present report aims to describe the development and background of a RoB assessment tool for caries diagnostic studies. The expert group developed and agreed to use a RoB assessment tool during three workshops. Here, existing instruments (e.g., QUADAS 2 and the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual) influenced the hierarchy and phrasing of the signalling questions that were adapted to the specific dental purpose. The tailored RoB assessment tool that was created consists of 16 signalling questions that are organized in four domains. This tool considers the selection/spectrum bias (1), the bias of the index (2) and reference tests (3), and the bias of the study flow and data analysis (4) and can be downloaded from the journal website. This paper explores possible sources of heterogeneity and bias in caries diagnostic studies and summarizes the relevant methodological aspects.

摘要

龋病诊断研究在设计、纳入的患者/牙齿样本、诊断方法和参考方法的使用、校准、盲法和数据报告等方面存在差异。这种异质性使得研究之间的比较变得困难,并且在未被识别时可能代表着实质性的偏倚风险(RoB)。因此,本报告旨在描述一种用于龋病诊断研究的RoB评估工具的开发过程和背景。专家组在三次研讨会期间开发并同意使用一种RoB评估工具。在此,现有工具(如QUADAS 2和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所评审手册)影响了为适应特定牙科目的而调整的信号问题的层次结构和措辞。创建的定制RoB评估工具由16个信号问题组成,这些问题分为四个领域。该工具考虑了选择/谱偏倚(1)、指标(2)和参考测试(3)的偏倚以及研究流程和数据分析(4)的偏倚,可从期刊网站下载。本文探讨了龋病诊断研究中异质性和偏倚可能的来源,并总结了相关的方法学方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ee/8347423/c75099e673e2/jcm-10-03223-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ee/8347423/3a1fc70829e6/jcm-10-03223-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ee/8347423/c75099e673e2/jcm-10-03223-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ee/8347423/3a1fc70829e6/jcm-10-03223-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ee/8347423/c75099e673e2/jcm-10-03223-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying and Avoiding Risk of Bias in Caries Diagnostic Studies.识别并避免龋齿诊断研究中的偏倚风险。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 22;10(15):3223. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153223.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries.用于龋齿检测的荧光设备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD013811. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013811.
4
A scoping review shows that no single existing risk of bias assessment tool considers all sources of bias for cross-sectional studies.一项范围综述表明,没有任何一个现有的偏倚风险评估工具考虑了横断面研究的所有偏倚来源。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Aug;172:111408. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111408. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
5
RoB-SPEO: A tool for assessing risk of bias in studies estimating the prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.RoB-SPEO:一种评估工具,用于评估世界卫生组织/国际劳工组织联合估计工作相关疾病和伤害负担研究中估计职业风险因素暴露患病率的偏倚风险。
Environ Int. 2020 Feb;135:105039. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105039. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
6
STAndard Reporting of CAries Detection and Diagnostic Studies (STARCARDDS).STAndard 报告的 CAries 检测和诊断研究(STARCARDDS)。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1947-1955. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04173-3. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
7
Can we trust visual methods alone for detecting caries in teeth?我们能否仅依靠视觉方法来检测牙齿龋坏?
Evid Based Dent. 2016 Jun;17(2):41-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401165.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry in the detection of dental caries: a systematic review.远程牙科诊断龋齿的准确性:系统评价。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2016 Sep;16(3):161-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
9
Dental Caries in Children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的龋齿:一项荟萃分析
Caries Res. 2022;56(1):3-14. doi: 10.1159/000521142. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
10
A tool for assessment of risk of bias in studies of adverse effects of orthodontic treatment applied in a systematic review on external root resorption.一种用于评估系统评价中正畸治疗不良反应风险偏倚的工具,该系统评价针对的是牙根外吸收。
Eur J Orthod. 2021 Aug 3;43(4):457-466. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa072.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of dental findings between dentists and pediatricians using intraoral scan-based teledentistry in children.使用基于口内扫描的远程牙科技术对儿童进行检查时牙医与儿科医生的牙科检查结果比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 2;15(1):32287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17870-w.
2
Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Early Childhood Caries Detection in Dental Photographs.基于人工智能的牙科照片中幼儿龋齿检测模型的验证
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 3;13(17):5215. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175215.
3
ORCA-EFCD consensus report on clinical recommendation for caries diagnosis. Paper I: caries lesion detection and depth assessment.

本文引用的文献

1
Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents: an EAPD policy document.儿童和青少年牙科X光片开具的最佳临床实践指南:一份欧洲儿科牙科学会政策文件
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Aug;21(4):375-386. doi: 10.1007/s40368-019-00493-x. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
2
When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement.何时干预龋齿进程?专家德尔菲共识声明。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Oct;23(10):3691-3703. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03058-w. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
3
European Society of Endodontology position statement: Management of deep caries and the exposed pulp.
ORCA-EFCD 共识报告关于龋病诊断的临床推荐。第 I 部分:龋损的检测和深度评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 22;28(4):227. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05597-3.
4
Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-aided caries detection on bitewing radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.咬合翼片X线片上人工智能辅助龋病检测的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024 Dec;60:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
5
The Dentist's Ability to Detect Different Restorative Procedures on Periapical Radiographs-Results from a Reliability Study.牙医在根尖片上检测不同修复程序的能力——一项可靠性研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2619. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032619.
6
Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.间接粘结技术的托槽转移准确性——一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2022 May 4;11(9):2568. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092568.
7
Emerging Technologies for Dentin Caries Detection-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于检测牙本质龋的新兴技术——系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 28;11(3):674. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030674.
8
ICCMS™ root caries lesions stages and their underlying depth towards the pulp: an in vitro study with histologic evaluation.ICCMS™ 根面龋病变分期及其向牙髓方向的潜在深度:组织学评估的体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2597-2605. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04229-4. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
欧洲牙髓病学会立场声明:深龋和露髓的处理。
Int Endod J. 2019 Jul;52(7):923-934. doi: 10.1111/iej.13080.
4
Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis.敏感性和特异性分析的最小样本量要求。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct;10(10):YE01-YE06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18129.8744. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
5
Laser fluorescence of caries detection in permanent teeth in vitro: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外恒牙龋病检测的激光荧光:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Evid Based Med. 2016 Nov;9(4):213-224. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12227.
6
In vivo validation of near-infrared light transillumination for interproximal dentin caries detection.近红外光透射法用于邻面牙本质龋检测的体内验证。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 May;20(4):821-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1559-4. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
7
Visual Inspection for Caries Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.口腔龋病目视检查:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dent Res. 2015 Jul;94(7):895-904. doi: 10.1177/0022034515586763. Epub 2015 May 20.
8
Radiographic caries detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.影像学龋齿检测:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2015 Aug;43(8):924-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
9
Detecting and treating occlusal caries lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis.检测和治疗窝沟龋损:成本效益分析。
J Dent Res. 2015 Feb;94(2):272-80. doi: 10.1177/0022034514561260. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
10
The Caries Assessment and Treatment (CAST) instrument.龋病评估与治疗(CAST)工具
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;41(1):e71-7. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12027.