Suppr超能文献

龋病评估谱治疗:严重程度评分。

Caries assessment spectrum treatment: the severity score.

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Int Dent J. 2018 Apr;68(2):84-90. doi: 10.1111/idj.12331. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To appraise the feasibility of the caries assessment spectrum and treatment (CAST) severity score according to the formula (F) recommended in the CAST manual.

METHODS

Data from an epidemiological survey of 680 schoolchildren (mean age ± standard deviation: 7.45 ± 0.91 years), living in a low-income area in Brasília, were used. The CAST instrument was used for assessing enamel carious lesions (CAST code = 3), dentine carious lesions (CAST codes = 4-7) and tooth loss from caries (CAST code = 8).

RESULTS

The prevalence of carious lesions including enamel and dentine in both deciduous and permanent dentitions was 49.41% and 69.12%, respectively. Calculating the CAST severity score per child using F was unsatisfactory because of the undiscriminating weight given for each CAST code. Modification of weights according to the accepted levels of disease severity for individual CAST codes resulted in a new formula (F1), in which the weight given to cavitated dentine lesions was quadrupled in relation to that given to enamel carious lesions; this was different from F, in which the weight given to such lesions was twofold. F1 was able to categorise satisfactorily the study children into one of three levels of dental caries severity: mild (34.1%); moderate (29.5%); or severe (36.4%).

CONCLUSION

According to the outcomes of the present appraisal, it was concluded that the numerical score provided by the CAST severity scores allows an overview of the severity of caries disease and the classification of individuals into mild, moderate or severe levels of dental caries when the new formula (F1) is used.

摘要

目的

根据 CAST 手册中推荐的公式(F),评估龋评估谱和治疗(CAST)严重程度评分的可行性。

方法

使用来自巴西利亚低收入地区 680 名学龄儿童(平均年龄±标准差:7.45±0.91 岁)的流行病学调查数据。使用 CAST 仪器评估釉质龋损(CAST 代码=3)、牙本质龋损(CAST 代码=4-7)和龋失牙(CAST 代码=8)。

结果

乳牙和恒牙的龋损包括釉质和牙本质的患病率分别为 49.41%和 69.12%。使用 F 计算每个儿童的 CAST 严重程度评分并不令人满意,因为每个 CAST 代码的权重没有区分。根据每个 CAST 代码的公认疾病严重程度水平修改权重后,得到了一个新的公式(F1),其中对龋洞牙本质病变的权重是釉质龋损的四倍;这与 F 不同,F 中给予这些病变的权重是两倍。F1 能够将研究儿童满意地分为三种龋齿严重程度等级之一:轻度(34.1%);中度(29.5%);或重度(36.4%)。

结论

根据本评价的结果,可以得出结论,当使用新公式(F1)时,CAST 严重程度评分提供的数值评分允许概述龋病的严重程度,并将个体分类为轻度、中度或重度龋齿水平。

相似文献

1
Caries assessment spectrum treatment: the severity score.龋病评估谱治疗:严重程度评分。
Int Dent J. 2018 Apr;68(2):84-90. doi: 10.1111/idj.12331. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
Dental caries spectrum profile in Brazilian public school children and adolescents.巴西公立学校儿童和青少年的龋齿谱特征。
Braz Oral Res. 2021 Jun 8;35:e067. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0067. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
The Caries Assessment and Treatment (CAST) instrument.龋病评估与治疗(CAST)工具
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;41(1):e71-7. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12027.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验