Laboratoire Contrôle Moteur et Perception, Université de Paris Sud ; Laboratoire de Biomécanique, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne.
Laboratoire Contrôle Moteur et Perception, Université de Paris Sud.
Biol Sport. 2014 Mar;31(1):55-62. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1086733. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
The validity of an accelerometric system (Myotest©) for assessing vertical jump height, vertical force and power, leg stiffness and reactivity index was examined. 20 healthy males performed 3×"5 hops in place", 3×"1 squat jump" and 3× "1 countermovement jump" during 2 test-retest sessions. The variables were simultaneously assessed using an accelerometer and a force platform at a frequency of 0.5 and 1 kHz, respectively. Both reliability and validity of the accelerometric system were studied. No significant differences between test and retest data were found (p < 0.05), showing a high level of reliability. Besides, moderate to high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (from 0.74 to 0.96) were obtained for all variables whereas weak to moderate ICCs (from 0.29 to 0.79) were obtained for force and power during the countermovement jump. With regards to validity, the difference between the two devices was not significant for 5 hops in place height (1.8 cm), force during squat (-1.4 N · kg(-1)) and countermovement (0.1 N · kg(-1)) jumps, leg stiffness (7.8 kN · m(-1)) and reactivity index (0.4). So, the measurements of these variables with this accelerometer are valid, which is not the case for the other variables. The main causes of non-validity for velocity, power and contact time assessment are temporal biases of the takeoff and touchdown moments detection.
该加速计系统(Myotest©)评估垂直跳跃高度、垂直力和功率、腿部刚度和反应性指数的有效性进行了检验。20 名健康男性在 2 次测试-重测期间分别进行了 3 次“5 次原地跳”、3 次“1 次深蹲跳”和 3 次“1 次反向跳”。使用加速度计和力台以 0.5 和 1 kHz 的频率分别同时评估变量。研究了加速计系统的可靠性和有效性。测试和重测数据之间没有发现显著差异(p < 0.05),显示出高度的可靠性。此外,所有变量的组内相关系数(ICC)均为中等至高(0.74 至 0.96),而反向跳时的力和功率的 ICC 为弱至中等(0.29 至 0.79)。关于有效性,两种设备在原地跳高度(1.8 厘米)、深蹲时的力(-1.4 N·kg(-1))和反向跳时的力(0.1 N·kg(-1))、腿部刚度(7.8 kN·m(-1))和反应性指数(0.4)方面的差异不显著。因此,该加速度计测量这些变量是有效的,但其他变量则不然。速度、功率和接触时间评估的非有效性的主要原因是起飞和着陆时刻检测的时间偏差。