Department of Cognitive Science, ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Melbourne School of Psychological Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 3;8:356. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00356. eCollection 2014.
Many children with reading difficulties display phonological deficits and struggle to acquire non-lexical reading skills. However, not all children with reading difficulties have these problems, such as children with selective letter position dyslexia (LPD), who make excessive migration errors (such as reading slime as "smile"). Previous research has explored three possible loci for the deficit - the phonological output buffer, the orthographic input lexicon, and the orthographic-visual analysis stage of reading. While there is compelling evidence against a phonological output buffer and orthographic input lexicon deficit account of English LPD, the evidence in support of an orthographic-visual analysis deficit is currently limited. In this multiple single-case study with three English-speaking children with developmental LPD, we aimed to both replicate and extend previous findings regarding the locus of impairment in English LPD. First, we ruled out a phonological output buffer and an orthographic input lexicon deficit by administering tasks that directly assess phonological processing and lexical guessing. We then went on to directly assess whether or not children with LPD have an orthographic-visual analysis deficit by modifying two tasks that have previously been used to localize processing at this level: a same-different decision task and a non-word reading task. The results from these tasks indicate that LPD is most likely caused by a deficit specific to the coding of letter positions at the orthographic-visual analysis stage of reading. These findings provide further evidence for the heterogeneity of dyslexia and its underlying causes.
许多阅读困难的儿童表现出语音缺陷,难以掌握非词汇阅读技能。然而,并非所有阅读困难的儿童都存在这些问题,例如选择性字母位置阅读障碍(LPD)儿童,他们会犯过多的迁移错误(例如将 slime 读成“smile”)。先前的研究已经探索了三个可能的缺陷部位——语音输出缓冲区、正字法输入词典和阅读的正字法-视觉分析阶段。虽然有强有力的证据表明英语 LPD 不存在语音输出缓冲区和正字法输入词典缺陷,但支持正字法-视觉分析缺陷的证据目前有限。在这项针对三位英语发展性 LPD 儿童的多项单案例研究中,我们旨在复制和扩展先前关于英语 LPD 损伤部位的发现。首先,我们通过直接评估语音处理和词汇猜测的任务排除了语音输出缓冲区和正字法输入词典缺陷。然后,我们通过修改以前用于定位此水平加工的两项任务——相同-不同决策任务和非词阅读任务,直接评估 LPD 儿童是否存在正字法-视觉分析缺陷。这些任务的结果表明,LPD 很可能是由于阅读的正字法-视觉分析阶段的字母位置编码缺陷引起的。这些发现为阅读障碍及其潜在原因的异质性提供了进一步的证据。