Myers Tony D
Physical Education and Sports Studies, Newman University Birmingham, UK.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 2;5:532. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00532. eCollection 2014.
Different factors have been postulated to explain the home advantage phenomenon in sport. One plausible explanation investigated has been the influence of a partisan home crowd on sports officials' decisions. Different types of studies have tested the crowd influence hypothesis including purposefully designed experiments. However, while experimental studies investigating crowd influences have high levels of internal validity, they suffer from a lack of external validity; decision-making in a laboratory setting bearing little resemblance to decision-making in live sports settings. This focused review initially considers threats to external validity in applied and theoretical experimental research. Discussing how such threats can be addressed using representative design by focusing on a recently published study that arguably provides the first experimental evidence of the impact of live crowd noise on officials in sport. The findings of this controlled experiment conducted in a real tournament setting offer a level of confirmation of the findings of laboratory studies in the area. Finally directions for future research and the future conduct of crowd noise studies are discussed.
人们提出了不同的因素来解释体育比赛中的主场优势现象。一种合理的解释是,偏袒主场的观众对体育官员的判罚产生了影响。包括专门设计的实验在内的不同类型研究都对观众影响假说进行了检验。然而,虽然研究观众影响的实验研究具有较高的内部效度,但它们缺乏外部效度;实验室环境中的决策与现场体育赛事中的决策几乎没有相似之处。这篇重点综述首先考虑了应用和理论实验研究中外部效度面临的威胁。通过聚焦一项最近发表的研究,讨论如何使用代表性设计来应对这些威胁,该研究可以说是首次提供了现场观众噪音对体育官员影响的实验证据。在真实比赛环境中进行的这项对照实验的结果,为该领域实验室研究的结果提供了一定程度的证实。最后讨论了未来研究的方向以及未来观众噪音研究的开展方式。