• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硝苯地平与坦索罗辛作为不采用体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的药物排石疗法的比较

A comparison of nifedipine and tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy for the management of lower ureteral stones without ESWL.

作者信息

Cao Dehong, Yang Lu, Liu Liangren, Yuan Haichao, Qian Shenqiang, Lv Xiao, Han Pin, Wei Qiang

机构信息

From the Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2014 Jun 11;4:5254. doi: 10.1038/srep05254.

DOI:10.1038/srep05254
PMID:24919112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4052729/
Abstract

Administration of nifedipine or tamsulosin has been suggested to augment stone expulsion rates. We aimed to compare the stone expulsion rates and adverse effects associated with the use of nifedipine or tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy (MET) for the management of lower ureteral stones (LUS) without extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) via a literature review and meta-analysis. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases. Finally, a total of 7 RCTs with 3897 patients were included. Our meta-analysis showed that tamsulosin could significantly increase the stone expulsion rate relative to nifedipine in patients with LUS (random-effects model; risk ratio [RR] = 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-0.88; P < 0.00001). The subgroup analysis indicated no statistically significant difference between the drugs with regard to minor or major adverse effects (fixed-effect model; RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.91-1.54, P = 0.20; and RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 0.22-11.82, P = 0.63, respectively). This meta-analysis demonstrated that tamsulosin was more effective than nifedipine in patients with LUS, as evidenced by the higher stone expulsion rate. Tamsulosin treatment should therefore be considered for patients with LUS.

摘要

有人建议使用硝苯地平或坦索罗辛来提高结石排出率。我们旨在通过文献综述和荟萃分析,比较在不进行体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的情况下,使用硝苯地平或坦索罗辛作为药物排石疗法(MET)治疗输尿管下段结石(LUS)的结石排出率和不良反应。从Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane CENTRAL和谷歌学术数据库中检索相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。最终,共纳入了7项RCT,涉及3897例患者。我们的荟萃分析表明,对于LUS患者,坦索罗辛相对于硝苯地平可显著提高结石排出率(随机效应模型;风险比[RR]=0.81;95%置信区间[CI]=0.75-0.88;P<0.00001)。亚组分析表明,在轻微或严重不良反应方面,两种药物之间无统计学显著差异(固定效应模型;RR=1.19,95%CI=0.91-1.54,P=0.20;以及RR=1.63,95%CI=0.22-11.82,P=0.63)。该荟萃分析表明,坦索罗辛在LUS患者中比硝苯地平更有效,结石排出率更高即为证据。因此,对于LUS患者应考虑使用坦索罗辛治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecad/4052729/dba3551d7968/srep05254-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecad/4052729/e457fb0c162a/srep05254-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecad/4052729/cd2ec480b23e/srep05254-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecad/4052729/dba3551d7968/srep05254-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecad/4052729/e457fb0c162a/srep05254-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecad/4052729/cd2ec480b23e/srep05254-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecad/4052729/dba3551d7968/srep05254-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of nifedipine and tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy for the management of lower ureteral stones without ESWL.硝苯地平与坦索罗辛作为不采用体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的药物排石疗法的比较
Sci Rep. 2014 Jun 11;4:5254. doi: 10.1038/srep05254.
2
Efficacy of expulsive therapy using nifedipine or tamsulosin, both associated with ketoprofene, after shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones.硝苯地平或坦索罗辛联合酮洛芬用于输尿管结石冲击波碎石术后促排石治疗的疗效
Urol Res. 2007 Jun;35(3):133-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0085-5. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
3
Comparison of tamsulosin with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in treating distal ureteral stones.坦索罗辛与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Apr 5;122(7):798-801.
4
Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus nifedipine for distal ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis.坦索罗辛与硝苯地平治疗远端输尿管结石的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Mar 29;10:1257-65. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S99330. eCollection 2016.
5
Role of silodosin as medical expulsive therapy in ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.西洛多辛在输尿管结石中的医学排石治疗作用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Apr;46(2):211-218. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0974-1. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
6
Use of drug therapy in the management of symptomatic ureteric stones in hospitalised adults: a multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of a calcium channel blocker (nifedipine) and an alpha-blocker (tamsulosin) (the SUSPEND trial).住院成年患者有症状输尿管结石管理中药物治疗的应用:一项多中心、安慰剂对照、随机对照试验以及钙通道阻滞剂(硝苯地平)和α受体阻滞剂(坦索罗辛)的成本效益分析(SUSPEND试验)
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(63):vii-viii, 1-171. doi: 10.3310/hta19630.
7
A network meta-analysis on the beneficial effect of medical expulsive therapy after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.一项关于体外冲击波碎石术后医疗排石疗法有益效果的网状荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 31;7(1):14429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14862-3.
8
Pharmacologic expulsive treatment of ureteral calculi.输尿管结石的药物排石治疗
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jul-Aug;40(7-8):1361-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G586. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
9
A Comparison of Boron Supplement and Tamsulosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Urinary Stones After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.硼补充剂和坦索罗辛在体外冲击波碎石术后排石治疗中的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2023 Nov;201(11):5126-5133. doi: 10.1007/s12011-023-03597-0. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
10
Use of drug therapy in the management of symptomatic ureteric stones in hospitalized adults (SUSPEND), a multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of a calcium-channel blocker (nifedipine) and an α-blocker (tamsulosin): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.住院成人有症状输尿管结石管理中药物治疗的应用(SUSPEND):一项关于钙通道阻滞剂(硝苯地平)和α受体阻滞剂(坦索罗辛)的多中心、安慰剂对照随机试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Jun 20;15:238. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-238.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing silodosin and mirabegron as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculus: a prospective, randomised study.比较西洛多辛和米拉贝隆作为远端输尿管结石药物排石疗法的效果:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(2):286-290. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.182. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
2
The Efficiency of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in the Treatment of Distal Ureteral Stones: An Unjustly Forgotten Option?体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:一个被不公正遗忘的选择?
Cureus. 2022 Sep 1;14(9):e28671. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28671. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Beneficial Extracardiac Effects of Cardiovascular Medications.

本文引用的文献

1
The efficacy of tamsulosin vs. nifedipine for the medical expulsive therapy of distal ureteric stones: A randomised clinical trial.坦索罗辛与硝苯地平用于远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
Arab J Urol. 2013 Dec;11(4):405-10. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
2
Medical expulsive therapy.药物排石疗法
Indian J Urol. 2014 Jan;30(1):60-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.124209.
3
Comparing the efficacy of tamsulosin and silodosin in the medical expulsion therapy for ureteral calculi.比较坦索罗辛与西洛多辛在输尿管结石药物排石治疗中的疗效。
心血管药物的有益心脏外作用。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2022;18(2):e151021197270. doi: 10.2174/1573403X17666211015145132.
4
Retrograde ureteroscopy in the management of distal ureteric stones: A retrospective analysis of outcome and complications.逆行输尿管镜治疗输尿管下段结石:回顾性分析结果和并发症。
Ann Afr Med. 2020 Oct-Dec;19(4):258-262. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_65_19.
5
Investigation of potential anti-urolithiatic activity from different types of Musa pseudo-stem extracts in inhibition of calcium oxalate crystallization.不同类型芭蕉假茎提取物抑制草酸钙结晶的潜在抗尿路结石活性研究。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020 Oct 19;20(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-03113-0.
6
Efficacy of combination terazosin and nifedipine therapy in postoperative treatment of distal ureteral stones after transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy.经尿道输尿管镜碎石术后联合特拉唑嗪和硝苯地平治疗对远端输尿管结石术后的疗效。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Apr;48(4):300060520904851. doi: 10.1177/0300060520904851.
7
Comparative efficacy of tamsulosin versus nifedipine for distal ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis.坦索罗辛与硝苯地平治疗远端输尿管结石的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Mar 29;10:1257-65. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S99330. eCollection 2016.
8
Update on medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: Beyond alpha-blockers.远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗的进展:超越α受体阻滞剂
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Nov;8(11-12):442-5. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2472.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Aug;7(8):1672-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6141.3241. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
4
A prospective randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a single proximal ureteral stone.坦索罗辛用于体外冲击波碎石术后治疗单个近端输尿管结石疗效的前瞻性随机对照试验
Korean J Urol. 2013 Aug;54(8):527-30. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.8.527. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
5
Administration of the selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist silodosin facilitates expulsion of size 5-10 mm distal ureteral stones, as compared to control.与对照组相比,给予选择性 α1A-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂西洛多辛可促进排出 5-10mm 大小的远端输尿管结石。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2013 Jun;45(3):675-8. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0429-8. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
6
Can tamsulosin facilitate expulsion of ureteral stones? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.坦索罗辛能否促进输尿管结石排出?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Urol. 2013 Aug;20(8):818-30. doi: 10.1111/iju.12048. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
7
Medical expulsion therapy for urinary calculi.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Nov;125(21):3765-8.
8
Tamsulosin for ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a randomized controlled trial.坦索罗辛治疗输尿管结石:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Urol Int. 2012;89(1):107-15. doi: 10.1159/000338909. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
9
Adjuvant tamsulosin or nifedipine after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.体外冲击波碎石术后辅助坦索罗辛或硝苯地平治疗肾结石:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Urology. 2011 Nov;78(5):1016-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.062. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
10
Management of ureteral calculi and medical expulsive therapy in emergency departments.急诊科输尿管结石的处理及药物排石治疗
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011 Jan;4(1):70-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.76840.