Bailey Marc A, Davies Jennifer M, Griffin Kathryn J, Bridge Katherine I, Johnson Anne B, Sohrabi Soroush, Baxter Paul D, Scott D Julian A
1] The Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health & Therapeutics, Division of Cardiovascular & Diabetes Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK [2] The Leeds Vascular Institute, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK.
The Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health & Therapeutics, Division of Cardiovascular & Diabetes Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Hypertens Res. 2014 Oct;37(10):926-32. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.101. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
Cardiovascular events pose significant morbidity and mortality burden to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients. Arterial stiffness as measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk. We investigated the relationship between aortic diameter and PWV. Consecutive patients with AAA were invited to participate. Patients completed a health questionnaire, received aortic ultrasound and carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) recordings with a Vicorder. Thirty patients were used for reproducibility assessment. A linear regression model was used to identify significant predictors of cfPWV. Observer variation was assessed using Bland and Altman analysis and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Three hundred and nine patients were included-148 with AAA and 161 controls. The mean difference for repeated cfPWV between observers was 0.11 ms(-1). cfPWV was positively correlated with age (r=0.24, P<0.001) and systolic blood pressure (r=0.29, P<0.001) and negatively correlated with aortic diameter (r=-0.15, P=0.008). There was no difference in cfPWV between AAA and control groups (9.75±2.3 ms(-1) vs. 9.55±2.3 ms(-1), P=0.43). Aortic diameter (P=0.003) and systolic blood pressure (P<0.001) were significant predictors of cfPWV independent of age, aspirin usage and a history of myocardial infarction. Patients with large AAA (>5 cm) had decreased cfPWV compared with patients with small AAA (P=0.02) or normal diameter aorta (P=0.02). Vicorder measurements of cfPWV are repeatable. cfPWV is negatively associated with infra-renal aortic diameter and reduced in large AAA. cfPWV is likely invalid for accurate arterial stiffness assessment in patients with AAA owing to the apparent confounding effect of aortic size.
心血管事件给腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者带来了巨大的发病和死亡负担。通过脉搏波速度(PWV)测量的动脉僵硬度是心血管风险的独立预测指标。我们研究了主动脉直径与PWV之间的关系。连续的AAA患者被邀请参与研究。患者完成了一份健康问卷,并接受了主动脉超声检查以及使用Vicorder进行的颈股脉搏波速度(cfPWV)记录。30名患者用于重复性评估。使用线性回归模型来确定cfPWV的显著预测因素。使用Bland和Altman分析以及组内相关系数评估观察者间差异。共纳入309名患者,其中148例为AAA患者,161例为对照组。观察者之间重复测量cfPWV的平均差异为0.11 m/s。cfPWV与年龄呈正相关(r = 0.24,P < 0.001)和收缩压呈正相关(r = 0.29,P < 0.001),与主动脉直径呈负相关(r = -0.15,P = 0.008)。AAA组和对照组之间的cfPWV没有差异(9.75±2.3 m/s对9.55±2.3 m/s,P = 0.43)。主动脉直径(P = 0.003)和收缩压(P < 0.001)是cfPWV的显著预测因素,独立于年龄、阿司匹林使用情况和心肌梗死病史。与小AAA患者(P = 0.02)或主动脉直径正常的患者(P = 0.02)相比,大AAA(>5 cm)患者的cfPWV降低。Vicorder测量的cfPWV是可重复的。cfPWV与肾下腹主动脉直径呈负相关,在大AAA中降低。由于主动脉大小的明显混杂效应,cfPWV可能无法准确评估AAA患者的动脉僵硬度。