• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A framework for describing health care delivery organizations and systems.一个用于描述医疗保健服务组织和系统的框架。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):670-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301926. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
2
How the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Promotes Health Literate Health Care.美国医疗保健研究与质量局如何促进具备健康素养的医疗保健服务。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 25;269:313-323. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200046.
3
Sustainability of partnership projects: a conceptual framework and checklist.伙伴关系项目的可持续性:一个概念框架和清单
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Dec;33(12 Suppl):37-47. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33122-x.
4
Organizational adaptation: bridging the research to practice gap.组织适应性:弥合研究与实践之间的差距。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):95-9. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0275-2.
5
Putting practice into research.将实践转化为研究。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;37(1):xiii-xxvi. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00001.
6
Redesigning health systems for quality: Lessons from emerging practices.为提高质量而重新设计卫生系统:新兴实践的经验教训。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Nov;32(11):599-611. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32078-8.
7
The US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's activities in patient safety research.美国医疗保健研究与质量局在患者安全研究方面的活动。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Dec;15 Suppl 1:i25-30. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg068.
8
Organization development in healthcare: conversations on research and strategies. Concluding remarks.医疗保健领域的组织发展:关于研究与策略的对话。结束语。
Adv Health Care Manag. 2011;10:389-92.
9
Overview of issues in improving quality of care for children.提高儿童医疗护理质量的问题概述
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 2):977-1000.
10
The challenge of comparative effectiveness: getting the right information to the right people at the right time.比较效果研究面临的挑战:在正确的时间将正确的信息传递给正确的人。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2008 Jan-Mar;23(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000303797.76962.9e.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies to Strengthen Iraq's Primary Healthcare System: A Systematic Literature Review With Special Focus on Society 5.0.加强伊拉克初级医疗保健系统的策略:一项特别关注社会5.0的系统文献综述
Public Health Chall. 2025 Feb 6;4(1):e70033. doi: 10.1002/puh2.70033. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Are EDs the Only Option? Hospital-Based Alternatives to the Emergency Department for Mental Health Crises: A Scoping Review.急诊室是唯一选择吗?针对心理健康危机的基于医院的急诊室替代方案:一项范围综述。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70060. doi: 10.1111/inm.70060.
3
Psoriatic Arthritis Priority Setting Partnership: patient- and clinician-informed considerations for future UK health service delivery.银屑病关节炎优先事项设定合作项目:患者与临床医生共同参与的关于英国未来医疗服务提供的考量因素
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jul 1;64(7):4335-4340. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae680.
4
Organization of primary care and early MOUD discontinuation.初级保健组织与早期药物辅助治疗停药
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00527-w.
5
Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling.为未满足的需求创造需求:敏捷故事讲述法。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 31;4:1376695. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1376695. eCollection 2024.
6
Exploring health equity integration among health service and delivery systems in Nova Scotia: perspectives of health system partners.探索新斯科舍省卫生服务和提供系统中的健康公平整合:卫生系统合作伙伴的观点。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Aug 26;23(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02256-7.
7
Protocol to develop strategies to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of Village Health Workers in service delivery in a selected district of Zimbabwe.制定战略以提高津巴布韦选定地区乡村卫生工作者服务提供的有效性和效率的方案。
MethodsX. 2024 Jul 5;13:102850. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102850. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
A Systematic Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Where are We, and What's Next?人工智能在护理中的应用系统评价:我们现状如何,未来走向何方?
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Apr 12;17:1603-1616. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S459946. eCollection 2024.
9
A cross-sectional study on exploring the antecedents of patient's revisit intention: Mediating role of trust in the hospital among patients in India.一项探索印度患者复诊意愿的影响因素的横断面研究:医院信任在其中的中介作用。
F1000Res. 2024 Mar 18;12:75. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.128220.2. eCollection 2023.
10
Defining Practice Capacity for Cancer Care Delivery to Adolescents and Young Adults in the Community Setting: 2022 Landscape Assessment Results.定义社区环境下为青少年和青年癌症患者提供护理的实践能力:2022 年景观评估结果。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2024 Jun;13(3):557-563. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0177. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: from assessing public health benefits to being open with the public.设定比较效益研究的优先顺序:从评估公共卫生效益到向公众公开。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec;30(12):2235-42. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0136.
2
New 2011 survey of patients with complex care needs in eleven countries finds that care is often poorly coordinated.2011 年对 11 个国家有复杂医疗需求的患者进行的新调查发现,这些患者的护理常常协调不善。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec;30(12):2437-48. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0923. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
3
Progress of Ontario's Family Health Team model: a patient-centered medical home.安大略省家庭健康团队模式的进展:以患者为中心的医疗之家。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):165-71. doi: 10.1370/afm.1228.
4
Applying comparative effectiveness research to public and population health initiatives.将比较效果研究应用于公共和人群健康举措。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Feb;30(2):349-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0593.
5
Using comparative effectiveness research to inform policy and practice in the UK HHS: past, present and future.利用比较效果研究为英国 HHS 的政策和实践提供信息:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):799-811. doi: 10.2165/11535260-000000000-00000.
6
Defining and measuring integrated patient care: promoting the next frontier in health care delivery.定义和衡量整体患者护理:推动医疗保健提供的下一个前沿。
Med Care Res Rev. 2011 Feb;68(1):112-27. doi: 10.1177/1077558710371485. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
7
Does pediatric patient-centeredness affect family trust?以儿科患者为中心是否会影响家庭信任?
J Healthc Qual. 2010 May-Jun;32(3):23-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00092.x.
8
The multi-stakeholder movement for primary care renewal and reform.多方利益攸关者推动基层医疗服务更新和改革。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):791-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0084.
9
Understanding the organization of public health delivery systems: an empirical typology.理解公共卫生服务传递系统的组织:一种经验类型学。
Milbank Q. 2010 Mar;88(1):81-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00590.x.
10
Achieving cost control, care coordination, and quality improvement through incremental payment system reform.通过增量支付系统改革实现成本控制、医疗协调和质量提升。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):2-23. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9f437.

一个用于描述医疗保健服务组织和系统的框架。

A framework for describing health care delivery organizations and systems.

作者信息

Piña Ileana L, Cohen Perry D, Larson David B, Marion Lucy N, Sills Marion R, Solberg Leif I, Zerzan Judy

机构信息

Ileana L. Piña is with Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore-Einstein Medical Center, Bronx, NY. Perry D. Cohen is with the Parkinson Pipeline Project, Washington, DC. David B. Larson is with the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. Lucy N. Marion is with the Medical College of Georgia School of Nursing, Macon. Marion R. Sills is with the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver. Leif I. Solberg is with HealthPartners Medical Group and Clinics, Minneapolis, MN. Judy Zerzan is with the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, Denver.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):670-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301926. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.301926
PMID:24922130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4358211/
Abstract

Describing, evaluating, and conducting research on the questions raised by comparative effectiveness research and characterizing care delivery organizations of all kinds, from independent individual provider units to large integrated health systems, has become imperative. Recognizing this challenge, the Delivery Systems Committee, a subgroup of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Effective Health Care Stakeholders Group, which represents a wide diversity of perspectives on health care, created a draft framework with domains and elements that may be useful in characterizing various sizes and types of care delivery organizations and may contribute to key outcomes of interest. The framework may serve as the door to further studies in areas in which clear definitions and descriptions are lacking.

摘要

描述、评估和开展关于比较效果研究提出的问题的研究,并对从独立的个体提供者单位到大型综合医疗系统等各类医疗服务提供组织进行特征描述,已变得势在必行。认识到这一挑战,医疗保健研究与质量局有效医疗保健利益相关者小组的一个子组——医疗服务提供系统委员会创建了一个框架草案,该草案包含一些领域和要素,可能有助于对不同规模和类型的医疗服务提供组织进行特征描述,并可能有助于实现感兴趣的关键成果。该框架可作为在缺乏明确界定和描述的领域开展进一步研究的敲门砖。