• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者与社区参与的关键概念:一项范围界定性元综述

Key concepts in consumer and community engagement: a scoping meta-review.

作者信息

Sarrami-Foroushani Pooria, Travaglia Joanne, Debono Deborah, Braithwaite Jeffrey

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 13;14:250. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-250.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-14-250
PMID:24923771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4074380/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although consumer and community engagement (CCE) in health care is receiving increasing attention, research and practice in this area are hampered by the variability of concepts and terminology commonly employed. This scoping meta-review aims to identify key CCE concepts and examine terminology used to describe them.

METHODS

In a scoping meta-review, an extensive list of 47 phrases and 11 Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) was used to undertake a comprehensive and systematic search in PubMed Central, Embase, EBM reviews, CINAHL, APAPsycNET, and Scopus.

RESULTS

59 systematic reviews met the selection criteria and were included in the final analysis. The analysis identified nine different concepts related to CCE: shared decision making, self-management, CCE in health care systems, community-based health promotion, providing access to health care, rehabilitation, participation in research, collaboration in research design and conduct, and peer support. The identified concepts differ from each other in many aspects including the aim of the activity, the role of consumers and the type of professionals' involvement. Each concept was described by a range of terms, with some terms shared by different concepts. In addition, two overlapping concepts of patient-centeredness and patient empowerment were recognised.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes CCE-related key concepts and provides new insight into their relationship with different CCE-related terms. Identification of key CCE-related concepts and terms will be useful to focus future studies and initiatives and enhance production of CCE-related evidence.

摘要

背景

尽管消费者和社区参与医疗保健日益受到关注,但该领域的研究和实践受到常用概念和术语多变性的阻碍。本范围综述旨在确定关键的消费者和社区参与概念,并研究用于描述这些概念的术语。

方法

在范围综述中,使用包含47个短语和11个医学主题词(MeSH)的广泛列表,在PubMed Central、Embase、循证医学综述、护理学与健康领域数据库、心理学文摘数据库和Scopus中进行全面系统的检索。

结果

59篇系统评价符合纳入标准并被纳入最终分析。分析确定了九个与消费者和社区参与相关的不同概念:共同决策、自我管理、医疗保健系统中的消费者和社区参与、基于社区的健康促进、提供医疗保健服务、康复、参与研究、研究设计与实施中的合作以及同伴支持。所确定的概念在活动目的、消费者角色和专业人员参与类型等许多方面彼此不同。每个概念都由一系列术语描述,有些术语为不同概念所共有。此外,还识别出以患者为中心和患者赋权这两个重叠概念。

结论

本研究描述了与消费者和社区参与相关的关键概念,并为它们与不同的消费者和社区参与相关术语之间的关系提供了新见解。确定与消费者和社区参与相关的关键概念和术语将有助于聚焦未来的研究和举措,并加强与消费者和社区参与相关证据的产出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/4074380/c0c30b3a2daa/1472-6963-14-250-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/4074380/8e0fa8d7680b/1472-6963-14-250-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/4074380/c0c30b3a2daa/1472-6963-14-250-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/4074380/8e0fa8d7680b/1472-6963-14-250-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29e2/4074380/c0c30b3a2daa/1472-6963-14-250-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Key concepts in consumer and community engagement: a scoping meta-review.消费者与社区参与的关键概念:一项范围界定性元综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 13;14:250. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-250.
2
Implementing strategies in consumer and community engagement in health care: results of a large-scale, scoping meta-review.在医疗保健领域实施消费者和社区参与策略:一项大规模范围界定性元综述的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 18;14:402. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-402.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.
8
Peer support for people with chronic conditions in rural areas: a scoping review.农村慢性病患者的同伴支持:一项范围综述
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3601. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience.患者参与医疗照护:最近经验证的评估患者和医疗保健专业人员偏好和体验的工具的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Dec;24(6):1924-1935. doi: 10.1111/hex.13344. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Integration of Community Advisory Boards to Inform Research on the Impact of Structural Racism on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in End-Stage Kidney Disease.社区咨询委员会的发展与整合,以为关于结构性种族主义对终末期肾病种族/族裔差异影响的研究提供信息。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70406. doi: 10.1111/hex.70406.
2
Impact of a Community-University Partnership on the Quality of Life in a Local Community: A Validated Survey.社区-大学合作关系对当地社区生活质量的影响:一项经过验证的调查
Cureus. 2024 Oct 30;16(10):e72692. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72692. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Perspectives of cancer consumer representatives on their involvement in healthcare service improvement: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Making sense of "consumer engagement" initiatives to improve health and health care: a conceptual framework to guide policy and practice.理解“消费者参与”计划以改善健康和医疗保健:指导政策和实践的概念框架。
Milbank Q. 2013 Mar;91(1):37-77. doi: 10.1111/milq.12002.
2
What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs.关于患者激活的证据表明:更好的健康结果和护理体验;关于成本的数据较少。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):207-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061.
3
Recruitment and retention of ethnic minority elders into clinical research.
癌症患者代表对参与医疗服务改善的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1324. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11669-7.
4
Community Engagement in Vaccination Promotion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.社区参与疫苗推广:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 10;10:e49695. doi: 10.2196/49695.
5
Characterizing terminology applied by authors and database producers to informatics literature on consumer engagement with wearable devices.描述作者和数据库生产者在信息学文献中应用的术语,以告知消费者使用可穿戴设备的参与情况。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;30(7):1284-1292. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad082.
6
Community engagement initiatives in primary health care to achieve universal health coverage: A realist synthesis of scoping review.初级卫生保健领域实现全民健康覆盖的社区参与举措:范围综述的现实主义综合。
PLoS One. 2023 May 3;18(5):e0285222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285222. eCollection 2023.
7
'Share your views'-international consultation informs a patient engagement strategy for the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer.“分享您的观点”-国际咨询会议为癌症支持治疗多国协会的患者参与策略提供信息。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec;30(12):9953-9961. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07366-y. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
8
Standardization of the assessment process within telerehabilitation in chronic diseases: a scoping meta-review.远程康复中慢性病评估过程的标准化:范围元综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):984. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08370-y.
9
Key drivers involved in the telemonitoring of covid-19 for self-health management: an exploratory factor analysis.新冠疫情远程监护自我健康管理的关键驱动因素:探索性因子分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07828-3.
10
Bridging Knowledge Systems: A Community-Participatory Approach to EcoHealth.桥接知识系统:生态健康的社区参与方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12437. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312437.
少数民族老年人参与临床研究的招募和保留。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2010 Jul-Sep;24 Suppl:S35-41.
4
The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination.参与的架构和效果:社区参与控制和消除传染病的系统评价。对消除疟疾的启示。
Malar J. 2011 Aug 4;10:225. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-225.
5
Rapid progress or lengthy process? Electronic personal health records in mental health.电子个人健康记录在精神卫生中的快速发展还是漫长过程?
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Jul 26;11:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-117.
6
A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services.文献综述:心理健康服务中的同伴支持。
J Ment Health. 2011 Aug;20(4):392-411. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2011.583947.
7
Community participation in Chagas disease vector surveillance: systematic review.社区参与恰加斯病病媒监测:系统评价。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Jun;5(6):e1207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001207. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
8
Interventions for enhancing consumers' online health literacy.提高消费者在线健康素养的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15;2011(6):CD007092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007092.pub2.
9
A review of consumer-provided services on assertive community treatment and intensive case management teams: implications for future research and practice.关于积极社区治疗和强化个案管理团队中消费者提供服务的回顾:对未来研究和实践的启示。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):37-44. doi: 10.1177/1078390310393283.
10
Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples.公众参与健康和社会保健系统评价过程:案例分析叙述性综述。
Health Policy. 2011 Oct;102(2-3):105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.002.