Sarrami-Foroushani Pooria, Travaglia Joanne, Debono Deborah, Braithwaite Jeffrey
Australian Institute for Health Innovation (AIHI), University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 18;14:402. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-402.
There is growing recognition of the importance of the active involvement of consumers and community members in health care. Despite the long history of consumer and community engagement (CCE) research and practice, there is no consensus on the best strategies for CCE. In this paper, we identify various dimensions of CCE-related strategies and offer a practical model to assist policy-makers, practitioners and researchers.
We undertook a large-scale, scoping meta-review and searched six databases using a list of nine medical subject headings (MeSH) and a comprehensive list of 47 phrases. We identified and examined a total of 90 relevant systematic reviews.
Identified reviews show that although there is a significant body of research on CCE, the development of the field is hindered by a lack of evidence relating to specific elements of CCE. They also indicate a diverse and growing enterprise, drawing on a wide range of disciplinary, political and philosophical perspectives and a mix of definitions, targets, approaches, strategies and mechanisms. CCE interventions and strategies aim to involve consumers, community members and the public in general, as well as specific sub-groups, including children and people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Strategies for CCE vary in terms of their aim and type of proposed activity, as do the methods and tools which have been developed to support them. Methods and tools include shared decision making, use of decision aids, consumer representation, application of electronic and internet-based facilities, and peer support. The success of CCE is dependent on both the approach taken and contextual factors, including structural facilitators such as governmental support, as well as barriers such as costs, organisational culture and population-specific limitations.
The diversity of the field indicates the need to measure each component of CCE. This meta-review provides the basis for development of a new eight stage model of consumer and community engagement. This model emphasises the importance of clarity and focus, as well as an extensive evaluation of contextual factors within specific settings, before the implementation of CCE strategies, enabling those involved in CCE to determine potential facilitators and barriers to the process.
消费者和社区成员积极参与医疗保健的重要性日益得到认可。尽管消费者和社区参与(CCE)的研究与实践历史悠久,但对于CCE的最佳策略尚无共识。在本文中,我们确定了与CCE相关策略的各个维度,并提供了一个实用模型,以协助政策制定者、从业者和研究人员。
我们进行了一项大规模的范围界定性元综述,使用九个医学主题词(MeSH)列表和47个短语的综合列表搜索了六个数据库。我们总共识别并审查了90篇相关的系统评价。
已识别的综述表明,尽管有大量关于CCE的研究,但该领域的发展受到缺乏与CCE特定要素相关证据的阻碍。它们还表明这是一个多样化且不断发展的领域,借鉴了广泛的学科、政治和哲学观点以及多种定义、目标、方法、策略和机制。CCE干预措施和策略旨在让消费者、社区成员及一般公众以及特定子群体(包括儿童和来自文化和语言背景多样的人群)参与进来。CCE的策略在其目标和提议活动的类型方面各不相同,为支持这些策略而开发的方法和工具也是如此。方法和工具包括共同决策、使用决策辅助工具、消费者代表、电子和基于互联网设施的应用以及同伴支持。CCE的成功既取决于所采取的方法,也取决于背景因素,包括政府支持等结构性促进因素以及成本、组织文化和特定人群限制等障碍。
该领域的多样性表明需要对CCE的每个组成部分进行衡量。这项元综述为开发新的八阶段消费者和社区参与模型提供了基础。该模型强调了清晰性和重点的重要性,以及在实施CCE策略之前对特定环境中的背景因素进行广泛评估的重要性,使参与CCE的人员能够确定该过程的潜在促进因素和障碍。