Deckers Filip, De Foer Bert, Van Mieghem François, Botelberge Thomas, Weytjens Reinhilde, Padhani Anwar, Pouillon Marc
Department of Radiology, GZA Sint-Augustinus Oosterveldlaan 24, Wilrijk, Belgium.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Aug;40(2):448-56. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24359. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
To evaluate the reproducibility and diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as an early predictor of response to chemotherapy of liver metastasis in routine clinical practice.
A prospective study of 20 patients with histologically proven primary tumors with liver metastases was undertaken. Diffusion weighted MRI was performed twice before and 12-14 days after the start of treatment. Absolute and liver normalized ADC values were calculated. Bland Altman statistics were used to assess the reproducibility of ADC change for predicting lesion response as measured by RECIST.
Nineteen of 31 metastases responded. Significant increases in absolute and normalized ADC values were found in responding (mean +208.7 × 10(-6) m(2)/s and +18% respectively, both P < 0.001) compared with nonresponding lesions (mean +98.6 × 10(-6) m(2)/s and 2%, respectively, P = 0.09 and 0.519). Reproducibility was better using normalized ADC compared with absolute ADC values (within patient coefficient of variability 8.0% and 10.1%, respectively). Using the repeatability threshold of ±22.3% for normalized ADC, only 8 of 19 responding and all but one nonresponding lesions could be prospectively detected.
Increases in ADC values in responding liver metastases occurred within days after the start of chemotherapy but were of smaller magnitude than the variability of ADC measurement. These preliminary data suggest that the presently used technique is not reliable enough to predict final response at such an early time point in individual lesions.
评估表观扩散系数(ADC)作为肝转移瘤化疗反应早期预测指标在常规临床实践中的可重复性及诊断价值。
对20例经组织学证实有原发性肿瘤伴肝转移的患者进行前瞻性研究。在治疗开始前及开始后12 - 14天进行两次扩散加权磁共振成像(DWI)。计算绝对ADC值及肝脏标准化ADC值。采用Bland Altman统计方法评估ADC变化对预测按实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)测量的病变反应的可重复性。
31个转移灶中有19个有反应。与无反应的病灶相比,有反应的病灶绝对ADC值及标准化ADC值显著增加(平均分别增加+208.7×10⁻⁶ m²/s和+18%,P均<0.001),而无反应病灶平均分别增加+98.6×10⁻⁶ m²/s和2%(P分别为0.09和0.519)。与绝对ADC值相比,使用标准化ADC值时可重复性更好(患者内变异系数分别为8.0%和10.1%)。使用标准化ADC值±22.3%的重复性阈值,19个有反应的病灶中只有8个以及除1个以外的所有无反应病灶可被前瞻性检测到。
有反应的肝转移瘤在化疗开始数天内ADC值升高,但幅度小于ADC测量的变异性。这些初步数据表明,目前使用的技术在个体病灶如此早期的时间点预测最终反应不够可靠。