• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创与开放脊柱手术患者教育资源的比较分析

A comparative analysis of minimally invasive and open spine surgery patient education resources.

作者信息

Agarwal Nitin, Feghhi Daniel P, Gupta Raghav, Hansberry David R, Quinn John C, Heary Robert F, Goldstein Ira M

机构信息

Departments of 1 Neurological Surgery and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Sep;21(3):468-74. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.SPINE13600. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

DOI:10.3171/2014.5.SPINE13600
PMID:24926930
Abstract

OBJECT

The Internet has become a widespread source for disseminating health information to large numbers of people. Such is the case for spine surgery as well. Given the complexity of spinal surgeries, an important point to consider is whether these resources are easily read and understood by most Americans. The average national reading grade level has been estimated to be at about the 7th grade. In the present study the authors strove to assess the readability of open spine surgery resources and minimally invasive spine surgery resources to offer suggestions to help improve the readability of patient resources.

METHODS

Online patient education resources were downloaded in 2013 from 50 resources representing either traditional open back surgery or minimally invasive spine surgery. Each resource was assessed using 10 scales from Readability Studio Professional Edition version 2012.1.

RESULTS

Patient education resources representing traditional open back surgery or minimally invasive spine surgery were all found to be written at a level well above the recommended 6th grade level. In general, minimally invasive spine surgery materials were written at a higher grade level.

CONCLUSIONS

The readability of patient education resources from spine surgery websites exceeds the average reading ability of an American adult. Revisions may be warranted to increase quality and patient comprehension of these resources to effectively reach a greater patient population.

摘要

目的

互联网已成为向大量人群传播健康信息的广泛来源。脊柱手术的情况也是如此。鉴于脊柱手术的复杂性,一个需要考虑的重要问题是大多数美国人是否能够轻松阅读和理解这些资源。据估计,全国平均阅读年级水平约为七年级。在本研究中,作者致力于评估开放性脊柱手术资源和微创脊柱手术资源的可读性,以提供建议来帮助提高患者资源的可读性。

方法

2013年从代表传统开放性背部手术或微创脊柱手术的50个资源中下载在线患者教育资源。每个资源使用Readability Studio Professional Edition 2012.1版的10个量表进行评估。

结果

代表传统开放性背部手术或微创脊柱手术的患者教育资源均被发现其写作水平远高于推荐的六年级水平。一般来说,微创脊柱手术材料的写作水平更高。

结论

脊柱手术网站上患者教育资源的可读性超过了美国成年人的平均阅读能力。可能需要进行修订以提高这些资源的质量和患者的理解程度,从而有效地覆盖更多患者群体。

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis of minimally invasive and open spine surgery patient education resources.微创与开放脊柱手术患者教育资源的比较分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Sep;21(3):468-74. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.SPINE13600. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
3
Readability assessment of patient education materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.美国耳鼻喉科学-头颈外科学会患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Sep;147(3):466-71. doi: 10.1177/0194599812442783. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
4
Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Surgical Treatments of the Spine.在线最常访问的与脊柱手术治疗相关的患者教育材料的易读性。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e583-e588. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials.美国鼻科学会患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Apr;3(4):325-33. doi: 10.1002/alr.21097. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
6
Assessing Online Patient Education Readability for Spine Surgery Procedures.评估脊柱外科手术在线患者教育资料的可读性。
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Mar;31(2):E146-E151. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000575.
7
Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.美国运动医学学会网站上患者教育材料的可读性。
Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Nov;42(4):125-30. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.11.2099.
8
Comparison of neurological healthcare oriented educational resources for patients on the internet.互联网上针对患者的神经科医疗保健导向型教育资源比较
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Dec;21(12):2179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.043. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
9
Evaluating the complexity of online patient education materials about brain aneurysms published by major academic institutions.评估主要学术机构发布的关于脑动脉瘤的在线患者教育材料的复杂性。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;127(2):278-283. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.JNS16793. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
10
Analysis of online patient education materials in pediatric ophthalmology.儿科眼科在线患者教育材料分析
J AAPOS. 2015 Oct;19(5):430-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.07.286.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (MILD) in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Prospective Trials.腰椎管狭窄症患者的微创腰椎减压术(MILD):随机和前瞻性试验的系统评价
J Pain Res. 2025 Jul 11;18:3527-3540. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S521038. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the Clinical Appropriateness and Practical Utility of ChatGPT as an Educational Resource for Patients Considering Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.评估ChatGPT作为考虑微创脊柱手术患者的教育资源的临床适用性和实际效用。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):e71105. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71105. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar fusion for degenerative spinal deformity.
接受后路胸腰椎融合术治疗退行性脊柱畸形患者的术后加速康复路径的实施。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jan 13;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06146-x.
4
Readability Analysis of Patient-Accessible Information Regarding Ambulatory Surgical Center Procedures.关于门诊手术中心手术的患者可获取信息的可读性分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):1046-1053. doi: 10.14444/8133. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
5
Automatic Global Level Set Approach for Lumbar Vertebrae CT Image Segmentation.基于自动全局水平集的腰椎 CT 图像分割方法。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Oct 8;2018:6319879. doi: 10.1155/2018/6319879. eCollection 2018.
6
Quantitative analysis of the level of readability of online emergency radiology-based patient education resources.基于在线急诊放射学的患者教育资源可读性水平的定量分析。
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Apr;25(2):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1566-7. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
7
Enhancing the Radiologist-Patient Relationship through Improved Communication: A Quantitative Readability Analysis in Spine Radiology.通过改善沟通增强放射科医生与患者的关系:脊柱放射学中的定量可读性分析
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;38(6):1252-1256. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5151. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
Evaluation of internet-based patient education materials from internal medicine subspecialty organizations: will patients understand them?对内科亚专业组织基于互联网的患者教育材料的评估:患者能理解这些材料吗?
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;12(4):535-543. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1611-2. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
9
A quantitative readability analysis of patient education resources from gastroenterology society websites.胃肠病学学会网站上患者教育资源的定量可读性分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jun;32(6):917-920. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2730-3. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
10
Colorectal cancer screening patient education materials-how effective is online health information?结直肠癌筛查患者教育材料——在线健康信息的效果如何?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Dec;31(12):1817-1824. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2652-0. Epub 2016 Sep 20.