Suppr超能文献

日本慢性疼痛患者对视觉模拟量表上不同锚定描述符的偏好。

Preference for different anchor descriptors on visual analogue scales among Japanese patients with chronic pain.

作者信息

Yokobe Junya, Kitahara Masaki, Matsushima Masato, Uezono Shoichi

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato, Tokyo, Japan.

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jun 13;9(6):e99891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099891. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Although many previous studies have examined the preference of patients for different pain measurement scales, preference for anchor descriptors has not been thoroughly discussed.

OBJECTIVES

To examine (1) the preferred end-phrases used in the VAS as anchor labels for Japanese patients with chronic pain, and (2) whether the preference differs according to factors such as age, sex, educational level, duration of pain, and pain intensity.

METHODS

We performed an observational study in patients suffering from non-cancer chronic pain for more than 3 months at a pain center in Japan. The patients were asked to rate their pain intensity using four types of VAS that used the following different anchor descriptors: "worst pain" ("Worst"), "worst pain bearable" ("Bearable"), "worst pain imaginable" ("Imaginable"), and "worst pain you have ever experienced" ("Experienced"). They were also asked to rank the four scales according to ease of responding, and asked which descriptor best reflected their perceived pain.

RESULTS

In total, 183 patients participated in the study. They consisted of 119 (65.0%) women and 64 (35.0%) men aged 18-84 years with the mean age of 56.9 years. "Experienced" was most preferred (69.8%), followed by "Bearable" (66.3%), "Worst" (48.8%), and "Imaginable" (16.9%). Factors such as age, sex, educational background, duration of pain, and pain intensity did not significantly affect the results. In 83.1% of patients, the preferred descriptor corresponded to the descriptor that best reflected patients' perceived pain.

CONCLUSION

The frequently used expression "worst pain imaginable" is considered to be difficult to understand for most patients. Widely preferred descriptors, such as "worst pain you have ever experienced" and "worst pain bearable", should be used when evaluating perceived pain. The preference of anchor descriptors was not significantly affected by the factors such as age, sex, educational level, duration of pain, and pain intensity.

摘要

背景

尽管此前已有许多研究探讨了患者对不同疼痛测量量表的偏好,但对于锚定描述词的偏好尚未进行充分讨论。

目的

研究(1)日本慢性疼痛患者在视觉模拟评分法(VAS)中用作锚定标签的首选结尾短语,以及(2)偏好是否因年龄、性别、教育程度、疼痛持续时间和疼痛强度等因素而有所不同。

方法

我们在日本一家疼痛中心对患有非癌性慢性疼痛超过3个月的患者进行了一项观察性研究。要求患者使用四种不同的视觉模拟评分法对疼痛强度进行评分,这四种评分法使用了以下不同的锚定描述词:“最严重的疼痛”(“Worst”)、“可忍受的最严重疼痛”(“Bearable”)、“可想象的最严重疼痛”(“Imaginable”)和“你所经历过的最严重疼痛”(“Experienced”)。还要求他们根据回答的难易程度对这四种量表进行排序,并询问哪种描述词最能反映他们感觉到的疼痛。

结果

共有183名患者参与了该研究。他们包括119名(65.0%)女性和64名(35.​​0%)男性,年龄在18至84岁之间,平均年龄为56.9岁。“Experienced”最受青睐(69.8%),其次是“Bearable”(66.3%)、“Worst”(48.8%)和“Imaginable”(16.9%)。年龄、性别、教育背景、疼痛持续时间和疼痛强度等因素对结果没有显著影响。在83.1%的患者中,首选描述词与最能反映患者感觉到的疼痛的描述词一致。

结论

大多数患者认为常用表述“可想象的最严重疼痛”难以理解。在评估感觉到的疼痛时,应使用广受青睐的描述词,如“你所经历过的最严重疼痛”和“可忍受的最严重疼痛”。锚定描述词的偏好不受年龄、性别、教育程度、疼痛持续时间和疼痛强度等因素的显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d64d/4057387/809c96057928/pone.0099891.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验