Sahal Estimé Michelle, Lutz Brian, Strobel Ferdinand
United Nations Development Programme, 304 east 45th street, FF-1176, New York, NY 10017, USA.
Global Health. 2014 Jun 13;10:48. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-48.
Noncommunicable diseases are a health and development challenge. Pacific Island countries are heavily affected by NCDs, with diabetes and obesity rates among the highest in the world. Trade is one of multiple structural drivers of NCDs in the Pacific, but country-level data linking trade, diets and NCD risk factors are scarce. We attempted to illustrate these links in five countries. The study had three objectives: generate cross-country profiles of food consumption and expenditure patterns; highlight the main 'unhealthy' food imports in each country to inform targeted policymaking; and demonstrate the potential of HCES data to analyze links between trade, diets and NCD risk factors, such as obesity.
We used two types of data: obesity rates as reported by WHO and aggregated household-level food expenditure and consumption from Household Income and Expenditure Survey reports. We classified foods in HIES data into four categories: imported/local, 'unhealthy'/'healthy', nontraditional/traditional, processed/unprocessed. We generated cross-country profiles and cross-country regressions to examine the relationships between imported foods and unhealthy foods, and between imported foods and obesity.
Expenditure on imported foods was considerable in all countries but varied across countries, with highest values in Kiribati (53%) and Tonga (52%) and lowest values in Solomon Islands and Vanuatu (30%). Rice and sugar accounted for significant amounts of imported foods in terms of expenditure and calories, ranking among the top 3 foods in most countries. We found significant or near-significant associations in expenditure and caloric intake between 'unhealthy' and imported foods as well as between imported foods and obesity, though inferences based on these associations should be made carefully due to data constraints.
While additional research is needed, this study supports previous findings on trade as a structural driver of NCD risk and identifies the top imported foods that could serve as policy targets. Moreover, this analysis is proof-of-concept that the methodology is a cost-effective way for countries to use existing data to generate policy-relevant evidence on links between trade and NCDs. We believe that the methodology is replicable to other countries globally. A user-friendly Excel tool is available upon request to assist such analyses.
非传染性疾病是一项健康与发展挑战。太平洋岛国深受非传染性疾病影响,糖尿病和肥胖率位居世界前列。贸易是太平洋地区非传染性疾病的多种结构性驱动因素之一,但国家层面将贸易、饮食和非传染性疾病风险因素联系起来的数据稀缺。我们试图在五个国家阐述这些联系。该研究有三个目标:生成各国食物消费和支出模式的概况;突出每个国家主要的“不健康”食品进口情况,为有针对性的政策制定提供信息;展示家庭收入和支出调查(HCES)数据在分析贸易、饮食和非传染性疾病风险因素(如肥胖)之间联系方面的潜力。
我们使用了两类数据:世界卫生组织报告的肥胖率以及家庭收入和支出调查报告中的家庭层面食物支出和消费汇总数据。我们将家庭收入和支出调查(HIES)数据中的食物分为四类:进口/本地、“不健康”/“健康”、非传统/传统、加工/未加工。我们生成了各国概况和跨国回归分析,以研究进口食品与不健康食品之间以及进口食品与肥胖之间的关系。
所有国家进口食品的支出都相当可观,但各国有所不同,基里巴斯(53%)和汤加(52%)的支出最高,所罗门群岛和瓦努阿图(30%)的支出最低。就支出和卡路里而言,大米和糖在进口食品中占比很大,在大多数国家位列前三大食品。我们发现“不健康”食品与进口食品之间以及进口食品与肥胖之间在支出和热量摄入方面存在显著或接近显著的关联,不过由于数据限制,基于这些关联的推断应谨慎做出。
虽然还需要进一步研究,但本研究支持了先前关于贸易是非传染性疾病风险结构性驱动因素的研究结果,并确定了可作为政策目标的主要进口食品。此外,该分析证明了这一方法是各国利用现有数据生成与贸易和非传染性疾病之间联系相关政策证据的一种经济有效的方式。我们认为该方法可在全球其他国家推广。如有需要,可提供一个用户友好的Excel工具来协助此类分析。