Suppr超能文献

在辅助生活设施和养老院中促进并防止污名化现象

Promoting and Protecting Against Stigma in Assisted Living and Nursing Homes.

作者信息

Zimmerman Sheryl, Dobbs Debra, Roth Erin G, Goldman Susan, Peeples Amanda D, Wallace Brandy

机构信息

Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and the School of Social Work, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,

School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2016 Jun;56(3):535-47. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu058. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To determine the extent to which structures and processes of care in multilevel settings (independent living, assisted living, and nursing homes) result in stigma in assisted living and nursing homes.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Ethnographic in-depth interviews were conducted in 5 multilevel settings with 256 residents, families, and staff members. Qualitative analyses identified the themes that resulted when examining text describing either structures of care or processes of care in relation to 7 codes associated with stigma.

RESULTS

Four themes related to structures of care and stigma were identified, including the physical environment, case mix, staff training, and multilevel settings; five themes related to processes of care and stigma, including dining, independence, respect, privacy, and care provision. For each theme, examples were identified illustrating how structures and processes of care can potentially promote or protect against stigma.

IMPLICATIONS

In no instance were examples or themes identified that suggested the staff intentionally promoted stigma; on the other hand, there was indication that some structures and processes were intentionally in place to protect against stigma. Perhaps the most important theme is the stigma related to multilevel settings, as it has the potential to reduce individuals' likelihood to seek and accept necessary care. Results suggest specific recommendations to modify care and reduce stigma.

摘要

研究目的

确定多层次环境(独立生活、辅助生活和疗养院)中的护理结构和流程在多大程度上导致辅助生活和疗养院中的污名化现象。

设计与方法

在5个多层次环境中对256名居民、家属和工作人员进行了人种学深度访谈。定性分析确定了在检查与污名相关的7个编码时,描述护理结构或护理流程的文本中出现的主题。

结果

确定了4个与护理结构和污名相关的主题,包括物理环境、病例组合、员工培训和多层次环境;5个与护理流程和污名相关的主题,包括用餐、独立性、尊重、隐私和护理提供。对于每个主题,都确定了一些例子来说明护理结构和流程如何可能促进或防止污名化。

启示

在任何情况下都没有发现表明工作人员故意助长污名化的例子或主题;另一方面,有迹象表明一些结构和流程是有意设置的,以防止污名化。也许最重要的主题是与多层次环境相关的污名,因为它有可能降低个人寻求和接受必要护理的可能性。结果提出了修改护理并减少污名的具体建议。

相似文献

6
Symptom experiences of residents dying in assisted living.在辅助生活环境中临终居民的症状体验。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 May;7(4):219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.09.011. Epub 2005 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

3
Ageism in the Mental Health Setting.心理健康领域的年龄歧视。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024 Nov;26(11):583-590. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01531-2. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
8
The Imperative to Reimagine Assisted Living.重新构想辅助生活的必要性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

7
Sensor technology to support Aging in Place.传感器技术助力居家养老。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
10
What is nursing home quality and how is it measured?养老院质量是什么,如何衡量?
Gerontologist. 2010 Aug;50(4):426-42. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq052. Epub 2010 Jul 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验