Alm Per A
Department of Neuroscience, Speech and Language Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
J Fluency Disord. 2014 Jun;40:5-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
Anxiety and emotional reactions have a central role in many theories of stuttering, for example that persons who stutter would tend to have an emotionally sensitive temperament. The possible relation between stuttering and certain traits of temperament or personality were reviewed and analyzed, with focus on temporal relations (i.e., what comes first). It was consistently found that preschool children who stutter (as a group) do not show any tendencies toward elevated temperamental traits of shyness or social anxiety compared with children who do not stutter. Significant group differences were, however, repeatedly reported for traits associated with inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity, which is likely to reflect a subgroup of children who stutter. Available data is not consistent with the proposal that the risk for persistent stuttering is increased by an emotionally reactive temperament in children who stutter. Speech-related social anxiety develops in many cases of stuttering, before adulthood. Reduction of social anxiety in adults who stutter does not in itself appear to result in significant improvement of speech fluency. Studies have not revealed any relation between the severity of the motor symptoms of stuttering and temperamental traits. It is proposed that situational variability of stuttering, related to social complexity, is an effect of interference from social cognition and not directly from the emotions of social anxiety. In summary, the studies in this review provide strong evidence that persons who stutter are not characterized by constitutional traits of anxiety or similar constructs.
This paper provides a review and analysis of studies of anxiety, temperament, and personality, organized with the objective to clarify cause and effect relations. Readers will be able to (a) understand the importance of effect size and distribution of data for interpretation of group differences; (b) understand the role of temporal relations for interpretation of cause and effect; (c) discuss the results of studies of anxiety, temperament and personality in relation to stuttering; and (d) discuss situational variations of stuttering and the possible role of social cognition.
焦虑和情绪反应在许多口吃理论中都起着核心作用,例如,口吃者往往具有情绪敏感的气质。对口吃与某些气质或人格特质之间可能的关系进行了综述和分析,重点关注时间关系(即先后顺序)。研究一致发现,与不口吃的儿童相比,口吃的学龄前儿童(作为一个群体)在害羞或社交焦虑等气质特征方面没有表现出任何升高的倾向。然而,与注意力不集中和多动/冲动相关的特质多次报告存在显著的群体差异,这可能反映了口吃儿童的一个亚组。现有数据与以下观点不一致:口吃儿童中情绪反应性气质会增加持续性口吃的风险。在许多口吃案例中,与言语相关的社交焦虑在成年前就会出现。口吃成年人社交焦虑的减轻本身似乎并不会显著改善言语流畅性。研究尚未揭示口吃运动症状的严重程度与气质特征之间的任何关系。有人提出,与社会复杂性相关的口吃情境变异性是社会认知干扰的结果,而不是直接来自社交焦虑情绪。总之,本综述中的研究提供了有力证据,表明口吃者并非以焦虑或类似构念的体质特征为特点。
本文对口吃、气质和人格的研究进行了综述和分析,目的是阐明因果关系。读者将能够:(a)理解效应大小和数据分布对解释群体差异的重要性;(b)理解时间关系对解释因果关系的作用;(c)讨论口吃与焦虑、气质和人格研究的结果;以及(d)讨论口吃的情境变化以及社会认知可能发挥的作用。